Skip to main content

Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sourcebook in the History of Philosophy of Language

Part of the book series: Springer Graduate Texts in Philosophy ((SGTP,volume 2))

  • 810 Accesses

Abstract

Arnauld and Nicole begin with the premise that language is secondary to and dependent on thought: language is a purely conventional means for expressing thoughts. So, all theorizing about language is really theorizing about the relationship between ideas and conventionalized sounds. This thesis was key to maintaining that language was a uniquely human (and rational) phenomena. The classification of meaning types occupied much of the first part of the Port Royal Logic. The second part of the selection concerns propositions, propositional structures, and propositional meaning. Unlike a more holistic use theory of propositional meaning, they push for a notion of propositional meaning that is a function of the words composing the proposition. They also address the important notion of truth/falsity and attempt to explain how not just propositions but also ideas and definitions can themselves be false.

Text from: Buroker, J.V. ed. 1996. Logic or the Art of Thinking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    [This example is borrowed from Descartes. See Sixth Meditation, Philosophical Writings, vol. 2, pp. 50–51.]

  2. 2.

    [Cf. Descartes to Mersenne, July 1641, Philosophical Writings, vol. 3, p. 185.]

  3. 3.

    [Cf. Hobbes, Third Set of Objections to Descartes’ Meditations and Gassendi, Fifth Set of Objections to Descartes’ Meditations, Philosophical Writings, vol. 2, pp. 127, 199–200.]

  4. 4.

    [This refers to the Protestant minister, Louis de Dieu (1590–1642).]

  5. 5.

    [Cf. Hobbes. Third Set of Objections to Descartes’ Meditations, Philosophical Writings, vol. 2, pp. 125–126.]

  6. 6.

    [Löringhoff and Brekle identify this as referring to Jean Claude (1619–1687), a Calvinist minister who carried on polemics against Jacques Bossuet, Nicole, and Arnauld. His principal work was the Reply to the Perpetuity of the Faith (Reponse au traité la perpétuité de la foi [Charenton, 1668]) of Arnauld. Clair and Girbal identify the minister as Andre Lortie; cf p. 72 n. 2.]

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur Sullivan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sullivan, A. (2017). Antoine Arnauld and Pierre Nicole. In: Cameron, M., Hill, B., Stainton, R. (eds) Sourcebook in the History of Philosophy of Language. Springer Graduate Texts in Philosophy, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26908-5_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics