Skip to main content

E-Citizenship Opportunities in the Changing Technological Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Future of Law and eTechnologies

Abstract

This chapter analyses the change that info technology has and will make to the concept of citizenship. E-citizenship can create new statuses, rights or privileges that we have not had before. Nevertheless, all this creates several challenges to be resolved: security and surveillance issues, residence and rights, tax collection and many more.

The article first explains the concepts of citizenship that might be under further pressure to be changed, the rethinking of rights and duties of the e-citizens and also the identity of the e-citizens. It also explains the benefits of this new type of citizenship that is emerging and developing. Finally, it is also shortly explained how Estonian e-residency can be used as a model to create the European e-citizenship model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Lips (2006).

  2. 2.

    Joppke (2011), pp. 28–30.

  3. 3.

    Bosniak (2006), p. 162.

  4. 4.

    Dumbrava (2014), p. 131.

  5. 5.

    Marshall (1965).

  6. 6.

    Sassen (1996).

  7. 7.

    See, for example, Kymlicka (1995) and Young (2000).

  8. 8.

    Chadwick (2006).

  9. 9.

    Coleman and Gotze (2001), p. 5.

  10. 10.

    Bentivegna (2006).

  11. 11.

    Van Dijk and Hacker (2003).

  12. 12.

    Mossberger et al. (2008).

  13. 13.

    Karakaya Polat and Pratchett (2013).

  14. 14.

    See, for example, Soysal (1994) and Bauböck (1994).

  15. 15.

    Liechtenstein v Guatemala, Second Phase 1955 ICJ Reports 4 (Judgment of 6 April), 23.

  16. 16.

    Rubio-Marín (2006) and Carens (2010).

  17. 17.

    Bauböck’s (2007).

  18. 18.

    Groot (de) and Vink (2013).

  19. 19.

    Joppke (2008).

  20. 20.

    See Ragazzi (2014) and Collyer (2013).

  21. 21.

    Kelder (2015).

  22. 22.

    See more about e-residency in the chapter written by Särav and Kerikmäe.

  23. 23.

    Identity Documents and State Fees Amendment Act, RT I, 29.10.2014, 1.

  24. 24.

    REGULATION (EU) No 910/2014 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL, of 23 July 2014, on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC.

  25. 25.

    Council of Europe’s Recommendation on legal, operational and technical standards for e-voting, Rec (2004) 11, September 2004. http://www.coe.int/T/e/integrated_projects/democracy/02_Activities/02_e-voting/.

  26. 26.

    Quoted in Trechsel and Mendez (2005), p. 4.

  27. 27.

    Previous Treaty Article 8(1) was repealed with “1. Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall complement and not replace national citizenship.”

  28. 28.

    C 430/10 Hristo Gaydarov, 17 November 2011; C 48/75 Rojer [1967] ECR 497, paras 31–33, C-184/99 Grzelczyk [2001] ECR I-6193.

  29. 29.

    Dzankic (2012).

  30. 30.

    Barry (2006).

  31. 31.

    Ayelet and Bauböck (2014).

References

  • Ayelet S, Bauböck R (2014) Should citizenship be for sale? European University Institute, EUDO Observatory on Citizenship, San Domenico di Fiesole

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry K (2006) Home and away: the construction of citizenship in an emigration context. N Y Univ Law Rev 81(11): New York, New York University

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck R (1994) Transnational citizenship. Membership and rights in international migration. Edward Elgar, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauböck R (2007) Stakeholder citizenship and transnational political participation: a normative evaluation of external voting. Fordham Law Rev 75:2393–2447. New York: Fordham University School of Law

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentivegna S (2006) Rethinking politics in the world of ICTs. Eur J Commun 21(3):331–343: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosniak L (2006) Citizen and the alien: dilemmas of contemporary membership. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carens JH (2010) Immigrants and the right to stay. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick A (2006) Internet politics: states, citizens, and new communication technologies. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman S, Gotze J (2001) Bowling together: online public engagement in policy deliberation. Hansard Society, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Collyer M (2013) Emigration nations: policies and ideologies of emigrant engagement. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dumbrava C (2014) Nationality, citizenship and ethno-cultural belonging: preferential membership policies in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, Hampshire

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dzankic J (2012) The pros and cons of ius pecuniae: investor citizenship in comparative perspective. EUI Working Paper RSCAS 2012/14 (Available online at: http://cadmus.eui.eu/handle/1814/21476)

  • Groot (de) G-R, Vink MP (2013) The relationship between citizenship and residence in the citizenship laws of the Member States of the European Union. In CARIM-India Research Report 2013/25. European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, San Domenici di Fiesole

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke C (2008) Comparative citizenship: a restrictive turn in Europe? Law Ethics Hum Rights 2(1)

    Google Scholar 

  • Joppke C (2011) Immigration, citizenship, and the need for integration. In: Smith RM (ed) Citizenship, borders, and human needs. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, pp 157–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya Polat R, Pratchett L (2013) Citizenship in the age of the Internet: a comparative analysis of Britain and Turkey. Citizenship Stud 18(1):63–80. doi:10.1080/13621025.2013.780765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelder KAM (2015) E-residentsuse varjatud karid ehk mis juhtub kaugjuhitava äriühinguga? http://www.maksumaksjad.ee/modules/smartsection/item.php?itemid=1612. Accessed 30.06.2015

  • Kymlicka W (1995) Multicultural citizenship. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lips AMB (2006) E-government under construction: challenging traditional conceptions of citizenship. In: Koutrakou V, Nixon P (eds) Ctrl, Alt, Delete: re-booting the state via E-government. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall TH (1965) Class, citizenship and social development: essays. Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger K, Tolbert CJ, McNeal RS (2008) Digital citizenship: the internet. Society and participation. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragazzi F (2014) A comparative analysis of diaspora policies. Pol Geogr 41:74–89: Pergamon

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubio-Marín R (2006) Transnational politics and the democratic nation-state: normative challenges of expatriate voting and nationality retention of emigrants. N Y Univ Law Rev 81:117–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen S (1996) Losing control?: Sovereignty in an age of globalization. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Soysal YN (1994) Limits of citizenship. Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Trechsel AH, Mendez F (2005) The European Union and E-voting addressing the European Parliament’s internet voting challenge. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk J, Hacker K (2003) The digital divide as a complex and dynamic phenomenon. Inf Soc 19(4):315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young IM (2000) Inclusion and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lehte Roots .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roots, L., Dumbrava, C. (2016). E-Citizenship Opportunities in the Changing Technological Environment. In: Kerikmäe, T., Rull, A. (eds) The Future of Law and eTechnologies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26896-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26894-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26896-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics