Skip to main content

EUS for Pain Control in Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Pancreaticobiliary Endoscopy

Abstract

Chronic abdominal pain is often associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic malignancy, and it is a major cause of patient morbidity and healthcare cost. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided celiac plexus block (CPB) and celiac plexus neurolysis (CPN) are viable options for treatment of chronic abdominal pain in these clinical situations and have advantages over analgesic medications and/or percutaneous CPB/CPN. Technique for EUS-guided CPB/CPN varies from center to center, but all facilitate delivery of medication to the area of the celiac plexus in a safe, controlled manner via a transgastric anterior approach. Published reports demonstrate that EUS-guided CPN for pancreatic cancer pain is beneficial in selected patients and is at least as effective as percutaneous CPN. Comparatively, studies have shown that for chronic pancreatitis pain, CPB provides a lower degree of analgesia and a shorter duration of effect, whether by EUS or percutaneous approach. Serious complications from EUS-guided CPB/CPN are rare. Recently, direct targeting of the celiac plexus ganglia for block or neurolysis has been investigated and may provide greater analgesic effect than traditional CPB/CPN. Other areas of research include variations in injection technique and use of brachytherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ventafridda GV, Caraceni AT, Sbanotto AM, et al. Pain treatment in cancer of the pancreas. Eur J Surg Oncol. 1990;16:1–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lankisch PG. Natural course of chronic pancreatitis. Pancreatology. 2001;1:3–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hall TC, Garcea G, Webb MA, et al. The socio-economic impact of chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review. J Eval Clin Pract. 2014;20(3):203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ward EM, Rorie DK, Nauss LA, et al. The celiac ganglia in man: normal anatomic variations. Anesth Analg. 1979;58:461–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Netter FH. Atlas of human anatomy. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Brugge WR. EUS-guided ablation therapy and celiac plexus interventions. In: Hawes RH, Fockens P, editors. Endosonography. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier Press; 2011. p. 281–2.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Plancarte R, Velasquez R, Patt RB. Neurolytic blocks of the sympathetic axis. In: Patt RB, editor. Cancer pain. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1993. p. 377–425.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gebhardt GF. Visceral pain mechanisms. In: Chapman CR, Foley KM, editors. Current and emerging issues in cancer pain. New York, NY: Raven Press; 1993. p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Nusrat S, Yadav D, Bielefeldt K. Pain and opioid use in chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas. 2012;41(2):264–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Penman ID, Gilbert D. Basic technique for celiac plexus block/neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:S163–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kappis M. Erfahrungen mit local anasthesie bie bauchoperationen. Vehr Dtsch Gesellsch Chir. 1914;43:87–9.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang PJ, Shang MY, Qian Z, et al. CT-guided percutaneous neurolytic celiac plexus block technique. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31(6):710–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Luz LP, Al-Haddad MA, DeWitt JA. EUS-guided celiac plexus interventions in pancreatic cancer pain: an update and controversies for the endonographer. Endosc Ultrasound. 2014;3(4):213–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Yan BM, Myers RP. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for pain control in unresectable pancreatic cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007;102:430–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiersema MJ, Wiersema LM. Endosonography-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 1996;44:656–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. LeBlanc JK, Dewitt JA, Johnson C, et al. A prospective randomized trial of 1 versus 2 injections during EUS-guided celiac plexus block for chronic pancreatitis pain. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69(4):835–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis: a prospective single center experience. Am J Gastroenterol. 2001;96:409–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wiersema MJ, Wong GY, Croghan GA. Endoscopic technique with ultrasound imaging for neurolytic celiac plexus block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2001;26:159–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. LeBlanc JK, Al-Haddad M, McHenry L, et al. A prospective, randomized study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer: one injection or two? Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;74(6):1300–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Adverse events associated with EUS and EUS with FNA. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77(6):839–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Alvarez-Sanchez MV, Jenssen C, Faiss S, et al. Interventional endoscopic ultrasonography: an overview of safety and complications. Surg Endosc. 2014;28:712–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Toole TM, Schmulewitz N. Complication rates of EUS-guided celiac plexus blockade and neurolysis: results of a large case series. Endoscopy. 2009;41:593–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gunaratnam NT, Sarma AV, Norton ID, Wiersema MJ. A prospective study of EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pancreatic cancer pain. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:316–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Puli SR, Reddy JB, Bechtold ML, et al. EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for pain due to chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer pain: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Dig Dis Sci. 2009;54:2330–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kaufman M, Singh G, Das S, et al. Efficacy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block and celiac plexus neurolysis for managing abdominal pain associated with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2010;44:127–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wyse JM, Carone M, Paquin SC, et al. Randomized, double-blind, controlled trial of early endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis to prevent pain progression in patients with newly diagnosed, painful, inoperable pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3541–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiechowska-Kozlowska A, Boer K, Wojcicki M, Milkiewicz P. The efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis for treatment of pain in patients with pancreatic cancer. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012; epub Feb 7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Iwata K, Yasuda I, Enya M, et al. Predictive factors for pain relief after endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Dig Endosc. 2011;23:140–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Sahai AV, Lemelin V, Lam E, Paquin SC. Central vs. bilateral endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus block or neurolysis: a comparative study of short-term effectiveness. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;104:326–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Eisenberg E, Carr DB, Chalmers TC. Neurolytic celiac plexus block for treatment of cancer pain: a meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 1995;80(2):290–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Arcidiacono PG, Calori G, Carrara S, et al. Celiac plexus block for pancreatic cancer pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;16(3), CD007519.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gress F, Schmitt C, Sherman S, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of endoscopic ultrasound- and computed tomography-guided celiac plexus block for managing chronic pancreatitis pain. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:900–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Santosh D, Lakhtakia S, Gupta R, et al. Clinical trial: a randomized trial comparing fluoroscopy guided percutaneous technique vs. endoscopic ultrasound guided technique of coeliac plexus block for treatment of pain in chronic pancreatitis. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;29(9):979–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wilcox CM, Yadav D, Ye T, et al. Chronic pancreatitis pain pattern and severity are independent of abdominal imaging findings. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(3):552–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. D’Haese JG, Ceyhan GO, Demir IE, et al. Treatment options in painful chronic pancreatitis: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford). 2014;16(6):512–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Seicean A, Vultur S. Endoscopic therapy in chronic pancreatitis: current perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2014;8:1–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoffman BJ. EUS-guided celiac plexus block/neurolysis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;56(4 Suppl):S26–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. LeBlanc JK, Rawl S, Juan M, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis in pancreatic cancer: a prospective pilot study of study using 10 mL versus 20 mL alcohol. Diagn Ther Endosc 2013; Epub 2013 Jan 8.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lillemoe KD, Cameron JL, Kaufman HS, et al. Chemical splanchnicectomy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg. 1993;217(5):447–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  40. De Conno F, Caraceni A, Aldrighetti L, et al. Paraplegia following coeliac plexus block. Pain. 1993;55(3):383–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Fujii L, Clain JE, Morris JM, et al. Anterior spinal cord infarction with permanent paralysis following endoscopic ultrasound celiac plexus neurolysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 2 CTN):E265–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mercadante S, Nicosia F. Celiac plexus block: a reappraisal. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1998;23(1):37–48.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Loeve US, Mortensen MB. Lethal necrosis and perforation of the stomach and the aorta after multiple EUS-guided celiac plexus neurolysis procedures in a patient with chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc. 2013;77:151–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Gimeno-Garcia AZ, Elwassief A, Paquin SC, et al. Fatal complication after endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Endoscopy. 2012;44(Suppl 2 UCTN):E267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Jang HY, Cha SW, Lee BW, et al. Hepatic and splenic infarction and bowel ischemia following endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac plexus neurolysis. Clin Endosc. 2013;46:306–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Levy M, Rajan E, Keeney G, et al. Neural ganglia visualized by endoscopic ultrasound. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101:1787–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Gleeson FC, Levy MJ, Papachristou GI, et al. Frequency of visualization of presumed celiac ganglia by endoscopic ultrasound. Endoscopy. 2007;39(7):620–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Ha TI, Kim GH, Kang DH, et al. Detection of celiac ganglia with radial scanning endoscopic ultrasonography. Korean J Intern Med. 2008;23(1):5–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Levy MJ, Topazian MD, Wiersema MJ, et al. Initial evaluation of the efficacy and safety of endoscopic ultrasound-guided direct ganglia neurolysis and block. Am J Gastroenterol. 2008;103:98–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Ascunce G, Ribeiro A, Reis I, et al. EUS visualization and direct celiac ganglia neurolysis predicts better pain relief in patients with pancreatic malignancy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73(2):267–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Doi S, Yasuda I, Kawakami H, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided celiac ganglia neurolysis vs. celiac plexus neurolysis: a randomized multicenter trial. Endoscopy. 2013;45:362–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sakamoto H, Kitano M, Kamata K, et al. EUS-guided broad plexus neurolysis over the superior mesenteric artery using a 25-gauge needle. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010;105(12):2599–606.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Du Y, Jin Z, Meng H, et al. Long-term effect of gemcitabine-combined endoscopic ultrasonography-guided brachytherapy in pancreatic cancer. J Interv Gastroenterol. 2013;3:18–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Wang KX, Jin ZD, Du YQ, et al. EUS-guided celiac ganglion irradiation with iodine-125 seeds for pain control in pancreatic carcinoma: a prospective pilot study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012;76:945–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexander Lee M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Video Legend

EUS-Guided Celiac Plexus Neurolysis. Appropriate technique is demonstrated using live endosonographic imaging (MP4 13293 kb).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, A., Lee, L.S. (2016). EUS for Pain Control in Chronic Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Cancer. In: Adler, D. (eds) Advanced Pancreaticobiliary Endoscopy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26854-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26854-5_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26852-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26854-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics