Abstract
Coercive interventions of many kinds are the oldest problem of psychiatric institutions and still today are considered as necessary in seemingly all countries in the management of dangerous behaviour against self or others. Though a huge variety of coercive interventions has been in use, basically there are only four different types: therapy by coercion (typically by antipsychotics), use of therapeutic measures without primary therapeutic purpose (e.g. chemical restraint), separation (e.g. seclusion) and mechanical restriction (e.g. restraint by belts). Traditions still determine preferences in the use of coercive interventions. Interventions being considered as least restrictive in some European countries and frequently used there are considered as inhuman and inacceptable in other countries. Seclusion is banned in Denmark, mechanical restraint in the UK and parts of Switzerland, net beds are used in parts of Austria and Eastern European countries but are strongly disapproved in most other countries; involuntary medication is used as a last resort in some countries and as first choice in others. In recent years, epidemiological data and evidence from randomised controlled trials and studies with patient interviews have become increasingly available. Results allow an empirical approach to the claim of the ‘least restrictive intervention’. A ban of one kind of measure seems to lead to an increase of others and which is least restrictive is dependent on individual patient preferences and the context of action. Country comparisons yield valuable insight into the consequences of traditions and attitudes if they are different in the respective countries.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bak, J., & Aggernæs, H. (2012). Coercion within Danish psychiatry compared with 10 other European countries. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 66, 297–302.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics (6th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Bergk, J., Einsiedler, B., Flammer, E., & Steinert, T. (2011). A randomized controlled comparison of seclusion and mechanical restraint in inpatient settings. Psychiatric Services, 62, 1310–1317.
Bergk, J., Flammer, E., & Steinert, T. (2009). Ratings of coercive interventions by inpatients and staff in Germany. Psychiatric Services, 60, 1401–1402.
Bergk, J., Flammer, E., & Steinert, T. (2010). “Coercion Experience Scale” (CES) – validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures. BMC Psychiatry, 10, 5.
Burns, T., Yeeles, K., Molodynski, A., Nightingale, H., Vazquez-Montes, M., Sheehan, K., & Linsell, L. (2011). Pressures to adhere to treatment (‘leverage’) in English mental healthcare. British Journal of Psychiatry, 199, 145–150.
Colaizzi, J. (2005). Seclusion and restraint: A historical perspective. Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 43, 31–37.
Dickson, B. C., & Pollanen, M. S. (2009). Fatal thromboembolic disease: A risk in physically restrained psychiatric patients. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 16, 284–286.
Finzen, A., Haug, H. J., Beck, A., & Luthy, D. (1993). Hilfe wider Willen. Zwangsmedikation im psychiatrischen Alltag. Bonn: Psychiatrie-Verlag.
Fisher, W. A. (1984). Restraint and seclusion: A review of the literature. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 1585–1591.
Georgieva, I., Mulder, C. L., & Whittington, R. (2012). Evaluation of behavioral changes and subjective distress after exposure to coercive inpatient interventions. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 54.
German Society for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (DGPPN). (Ed.) (2010). Praxisleitlinien in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Band 2: Behandlungsleitlinie Therapeutische Maßnahmen bei aggressivem Verhalten in Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie. Darmstadt: Springer/Steinkopff.
Gudmundsson, O. (2012). Zwangsmaßnahmen in Island: Geschichte einer besonderen Ausnahme (Coercive measures in Iceland: History of a special exception). Psychiatrische Praxis, 39, 299–300.
Jaeger, M., & Roessler, W. (2010). Enhancement of outpatient treatment adherence: Patients’ perceptions of coercion, fairness and effectiveness. Psychiatry Research, 180, 148–153.
Jones, K. (1984). Robert Gardiner Hill and the non-restraint movement. Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 29, 121–124.
Kraepelin, E. (1918). 100 Jahre Psychiatrie. Zschr f ges Neurol u Psychiatr, 38, 173–218.
Mierlo, T., Bovenberg, F., Voskes, Y., & Mulder, N. (2013). Werkboek HIC: High en intensive care in de psychiatrie. Utrecht: De Tijdstroom.
Molodynski, A., Turnpenny, L., Rugkåsa, J., Burns, T., & Moussaoui, D. (2014). World Association of Social Psychiatry International Working Group on Coercion. Coercion and compulsion in mental healthcare – an international perspective. Asian J Psychiatry, 8, 2–6.
National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). (2005). Clinical practice guidelines for violence: The short-term management of disturbed/violent behaviour in psychiatric inpatient-settings and emergency departments. Accessed November 5, 2014, from www.nice.org.uk/Guidance/CG25/NiceGuidance/pdf
Øhlenschlaeger, J., & Nordentoft, M. (2008). Coercion and in patients who at their first contact with the psychiatric services system were diagnosed within the schizophrenia-spectrum in Denmark. A register study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 62, 77–81.
Parkes, J. (2008). Sudden death during restraint: Do some positions affect lung function? Medicine, Science and the Law, 48, 137–141.
Putkonen, A., Kuivalainen, S., Louheranta, O., Repo-Tiihonen, E., Ryynänen, O-P., Kautiainen, H., & Tiihonen, J. (2013). Cluster-randomized controlled trial of reducing seclusion and restraint in secured care of men with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 64, 850–855.
Raboch, J., Kalisová, L., Nawka, A., Kitzlerová, E., Onchev, G., Karastergiou, A., Magliano, L., Dembinskas, A., Kiejna, A., Torres-Gonzales, F., Kjellin, L., Priebe, S., & Kallert, T.W. (2010). Use of coercive measures during involuntary hospitalization: Findings from ten European countries. Psychiatric Services, 61, 1012–1017.
Rakhmatullina, M., Taub, A., & Jacob, T. (2013). Morbidity and mortality associated with the utilization of restraints: A review of literature. Psychiatric Q, 84, 499–512.
Snorrason, J. (2007). Observations in acute psychiatric units in Landspitali University Hospital in Reykjavik. In P. Callaghan, H. Nijman, T. Palmstierna, & N. Oud (Eds.), Violence in clinical psychiatry (p. 277). Proceedings of the 5th European Congress on Violence in Clinical Psychiatry Kavanah, Amsterdam.
Steering Committee on Bioethics of the Council of Europe. (2005). White paper on the protection of the human rights and dignity of people suffering from mental disorders, especially those placed as involuntary patients in a psychiatric establishment. Accessed October 29, 2014, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/activities/08_psychiatry_and_human_rights_en/dir-jur(2000)2whitepaper.pdf
Steinert, T. (2011). Nach 200 Jahren Psychiatrie: Sind Fixierungen in Deutschland unvermeidlich? Psychiatrische Praxis, 38, 348–351.
Steinert, T. (2014). Missbrauch der Psychiatrie. Psychiatrische Praxis, 41, 237–238.
Steinert, T., Birk, M., Flammer, E., & Bergk, J. (2013). Subjective distress after seclusion or mechanical restraint: One-year follow-up of a randomized controlled study. Psychiatric Services, 64, 1012–1017.
Steinert, T., & Lepping, P. (2009). Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. A case vignette study in 16 European countries. European Psychiatry, 24, 135–141.
Steinert, T., Lepping, P., Bernhardsgrütter, R., Conca, C., Hatling, T., Janssen, W., Keski-Valkama, A., Mayoral, F., & Whittington, R. (2010). Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: A literature review and survey of international trends. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 45, 889–897.
Steinert, T., Noorthoorn, E. O., & Mulder, C. (2014a). The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands. A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries. Front Public Health, 2, 141.
Steinert, T., & Schmid, P. (2004). Effect of voluntariness of participation in treatment on short-term outcome of impatiens with schizophrenia. Psychiatric Services, 55, 786–791.
Steinert, T., Schmid, P., & Arbeitskreis Prävention von Gewalt und Zwang. (2014b). Die gegenwärtige Praxis von Zwangsmaßnahmen in psychiatrischen Kliniken in Deutschland (2012). Nervenarzt, 85, 621–629.
Stewart, D., Bowers, L., Simpson, A., Ryan, C., & Tziggili, M. (2009). Manual restraint of adult psychiatric inpatients: A literature review. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 16, 749–757.
Suryani, L. K., Lesmana, C. B., & Tiliopoulos, N. (2011). Treating the untreated: Applying a community-based, culturally sensitive psychiatric intervention to confined and physically restrained mentally ill individuals in Bali, Indonesia. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 261(Suppl 2), 140–144.
United Nations. (Ed.) (2007). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Accessed November 5, 2014, from http://www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
Veltkamp, E., Nijman, H., Stolker, J. J., Frigge, K., Dries, P., & Bowers, L. (2008). Patients’ preferences for seclusion or forced medication in acute psychiatric emergency in the Netherlands. Psychiatric Services, 59, 209–211.
Vruwink, F. J., Mulder, C. L., Noorthoorn, E. O., Uitenbroek, D., & Nijman, H. L. I. (2012). The effects of a nationwide program to reduce seclusion in the Netherlands. BMC Psychiatry, 12, 231–232.
Whittington, R., Bowers, L., Nolan, P., Simpson, A., & Neil, L. (2009). Approval ratings of inpatient coercive interventions in a national sample of mental health service users and staff in England. Psychiatric Services, 60, 792–798.
World Health Organization. (2005). WHO resource book on mental health, human rights and legislation. Stop exclusion, dare to care. Accessed October 30, 2014, from www.who.int/mental_health/policy/resource_book_MHLeg.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Steinert, T. (2016). An International Perspective on the Use of Coercive Measures. In: Völlm, B., Nedopil, N. (eds) The Use of Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatric Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26748-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26748-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26746-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26748-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)