Skip to main content

Cutaneous Testing: Detection and Assessment of Allergy

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Agache’s Measuring the Skin
  • 156 Accesses

Abstract

Patients often turn to dermatologists because of problems of skin allergy, either of an external origin (contact allergy) or associated with allergenic compounds intake (endogenous allergic reaction). Skin tests are also frequently used to confirm the allergic mechanism of noncutaneous diseases (asthma, conjonctivitis). Investigations apply mainly to either immediate IgE-mediated Gell and Coombs’type I allergy or delayed, cell mediated type IV allergy. The reading is also immediate or delayed, depending on the mechanism involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barbaud A, Gonçalo M, Bruynzeel D, Bircher A. Guidelines for performing skin tests with drugs in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45:321–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein IL, Storms WW. Summary statements of practice parameters for allergy diagnostic tests. Ann Allergy. 1995a;75:543–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein IL, Storms WW. Practice parameters for allergy diagnostic testing. Ann Allergy. 1995b;75:553–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bock SA. Oral challenge procedures. In: Metcalfe DD, Sampson HA, Simon RA, editors. Food allergy. Boston: Blackwell; 1991. p. 81–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruze M, Isaksson M, Gruvberger B, et al. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:281–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Castelain M. Complications des tests épicutanés. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 233–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castelain PY, Castelain M. Qu’attendre des prick-tests en dermatoallergologie? In: 13e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA. Nantes/Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1992. p. 24–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinuki Y, Kaneko S, Sakieda K, et al. A case of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis sensitized with hydrolysed wheat protein in a soap. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):55–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Groot AC. Test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals. Patch testing. Wapserveen: Acdegroot Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooms-Goossens A. Comment tester les produits apportés ? In: 11ème Cours d’actualisa- tion en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Genève. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1990. p. 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooms-Goossens A. Tests semi-ouverts, ROAT. In: Progrès en dermatoallergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 257–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooms-Goossens A. Evaluation critique du test épicutané. In: Progrès en dermato- allergologie: 17ème Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Bâle. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1996, p. 103–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer T. Allergic patch test techniques. In: Serup J, Jemec GBE, editors. Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995. p. 593–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frimat P. Aspects médico-légaux de l’enquète en dermato-allergologie. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 261–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano-Labadie F, Rancé F, Pellegrin F, Bazex J, Dutau G, Schwarze HP. Frequency of contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 137 cases. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:192–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grace Y, Basketter DA, Smith Pease CK, Wilson K, et al. Further evaluation of quantitative structure-activity relationship models for the prediction of the skin sensitization potency of selected fragrances allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50:91–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inerot A, Möller H. Symptoms and signs reported during patch testing. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 2000;11(1):49–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Isolauri E, Turjanmaa K. Combined skin prick and patch testing enhances identification of food allergy in infants with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97:9–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kamphof WG, Kunkeler L, Bikkers SCE, Bezemer PD, Bruynzeel DP. Patch-test-induced subjective complaints. Dermatology (Basel). 2003;207(1):28–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kligman AM, Basketter DA. A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;32:129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM. L’histoire contemporaine des batteries standard: une batterie standard 2: un réservoir utile? In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 217–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM. Giant steps in Patch testing: an historical memoir. SmartPractice; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM, Maibach H. Patch testing and prick testing. A practical guide. Official publication of the ICDRG. 3rd ed. London/New York: Heidelberg Dordrecht; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM, Tennstedt D. Les tests epicutanés dans les toxidermies médicamenteuses. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 19ème cours d’actualisation en dermatoallergologie du GERDA, Nancy. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1998. p. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle JM, Frimat P, Tennstedt D, Ducombs G. Dermatologie professionnelle et de l’environnement. Paris: Masson; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauriere M, Pecquet C, Bouchez-Mahiuot I, Snegaroff J, Bayrou O, Raison-Peyron N, Vigan N. Hydrolyzed wheat proteins present in cosmetics can induce immediate hypersensitivities. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;54:284–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantoux C. Intradermo réaction de la tuberculine. Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences. Paris. 1908;147:355–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menardo JL, Bousquet J, Michel FB. Comparison of three prick test methods with the intradermal test and with the rats in the diagnosis of mite allergy. Ann Allergy. 1982;48:235–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pepys J. Skin testing. Br J Hosp Med. 1975;14:412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pons-Guiraud A. Contre-indications des tests épicutanés. In: Progrès en dermato- allergologie: 16ème Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 229–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raison PN. Faut-il faire systématiquement des ajouts à la batterie standard d’épidermotests? Revue Française d’Allergologie. 2012;52(3):164–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rancé F, Dutau G. Labial food challenge in children with food allergy. Ped Allergy lmmunol. 1997;8:41–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salverda JG, Bragt PJC, de Wit-Bos L, Rustemeyer T, Coenraads PJ, Tupker RA, Kunkeler LC, et al. Results of a cosmetovigilance survey in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:139–48.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Svedman C, Isaksson M, Björk J, Mowitz M, Bruze M. Calibration of our patch reading technique is necessary. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66:180–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ketel WG. Patch tests: methodology, standardization and significance of positive results. Arch Belg Dermatol. 1973;28:73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigan M. Critères de lecture des tests epicutanés. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato- allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 245–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigan M. La lecture tardive des patch- tests. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 17e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Bâle. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1996. p. 109–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigan M, Brechat N, Girardin P, Vuitton DA, Laurent R. An alternative to animal testing active cosmetovigilance. In: Jadassohn Centenary Congress of the European Society of Contact dermatitis and the American contact dermatitis Society, London, 9–12 Oct 1996 (Abstract 166).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vigan M, Girardin P, Adessi B, Laurent R. Late reading of patch tests. Eur J Dermatol. 1997;7:574–6.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martine Vigan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Vigan, M. (2015). Cutaneous Testing: Detection and Assessment of Allergy. In: Humbert, P., Maibach, H., Fanian, F., Agache, P. (eds) Agache’s Measuring the Skin. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26594-0_68-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26594-0_68-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26594-0

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics