Abstract
Patients often turn to dermatologists because of problems of skin allergy, either of an external origin (contact allergy) or associated with allergenic compounds intake (endogenous allergic reaction). Skin tests are also frequently used to confirm the allergic mechanism of noncutaneous diseases (asthma, conjonctivitis). Investigations apply mainly to either immediate IgE-mediated Gell and Coombs’type I allergy or delayed, cell mediated type IV allergy. The reading is also immediate or delayed, depending on the mechanism involved.
References
Barbaud A, Gonçalo M, Bruynzeel D, Bircher A. Guidelines for performing skin tests with drugs in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Contact Dermatitis. 2001;45:321–8.
Bernstein IL, Storms WW. Summary statements of practice parameters for allergy diagnostic tests. Ann Allergy. 1995a;75:543–52.
Bernstein IL, Storms WW. Practice parameters for allergy diagnostic testing. Ann Allergy. 1995b;75:553–61.
Bock SA. Oral challenge procedures. In: Metcalfe DD, Sampson HA, Simon RA, editors. Food allergy. Boston: Blackwell; 1991. p. 81–95.
Bruze M, Isaksson M, Gruvberger B, et al. Recommendation of appropriate amounts of petrolatum preparation to be applied at patch testing. Contact Dermatitis. 2007;56:281–5.
Castelain M. Complications des tests épicutanés. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 233–44.
Castelain PY, Castelain M. Qu’attendre des prick-tests en dermatoallergologie? In: 13e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA. Nantes/Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1992. p. 24–31.
Chinuki Y, Kaneko S, Sakieda K, et al. A case of wheat-dependent exercise-induced anaphylaxis sensitized with hydrolysed wheat protein in a soap. Contact Dermatitis. 2011;65(1):55–7.
de Groot AC. Test concentrations and vehicles for 4350 chemicals. Patch testing. Wapserveen: Acdegroot Publishing; 2008.
Dooms-Goossens A. Comment tester les produits apportés ? In: 11ème Cours d’actualisa- tion en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Genève. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1990. p. 45–55.
Dooms-Goossens A. Tests semi-ouverts, ROAT. In: Progrès en dermatoallergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 257–60.
Dooms-Goossens A. Evaluation critique du test épicutané. In: Progrès en dermato- allergologie: 17ème Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Bâle. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1996, p. 103–7.
Fischer T. Allergic patch test techniques. In: Serup J, Jemec GBE, editors. Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995. p. 593–606.
Frimat P. Aspects médico-légaux de l’enquète en dermato-allergologie. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 261–7.
Giordano-Labadie F, Rancé F, Pellegrin F, Bazex J, Dutau G, Schwarze HP. Frequency of contact allergy in children with atopic dermatitis: results of a prospective study of 137 cases. Contact Dermatitis. 1999;40:192–5.
Grace Y, Basketter DA, Smith Pease CK, Wilson K, et al. Further evaluation of quantitative structure-activity relationship models for the prediction of the skin sensitization potency of selected fragrances allergens. Contact Dermatitis. 2004;50:91–7.
Inerot A, Möller H. Symptoms and signs reported during patch testing. Am J Contact Dermatitis. 2000;11(1):49–52.
Isolauri E, Turjanmaa K. Combined skin prick and patch testing enhances identification of food allergy in infants with atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1996;97:9–15.
Kamphof WG, Kunkeler L, Bikkers SCE, Bezemer PD, Bruynzeel DP. Patch-test-induced subjective complaints. Dermatology (Basel). 2003;207(1):28–32.
Kligman AM, Basketter DA. A critical commentary and updating of the guinea pig maximization test. Contact Dermatitis. 1995;32:129–34.
Lachapelle JM. L’histoire contemporaine des batteries standard: une batterie standard 2: un réservoir utile? In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 217–27.
Lachapelle JM. Giant steps in Patch testing: an historical memoir. SmartPractice; 2010.
Lachapelle JM, Maibach H. Patch testing and prick testing. A practical guide. Official publication of the ICDRG. 3rd ed. London/New York: Heidelberg Dordrecht; 2012.
Lachapelle JM, Tennstedt D. Les tests epicutanés dans les toxidermies médicamenteuses. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 19ème cours d’actualisation en dermatoallergologie du GERDA, Nancy. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1998. p. 57–66.
Lachapelle JM, Frimat P, Tennstedt D, Ducombs G. Dermatologie professionnelle et de l’environnement. Paris: Masson; 1992.
Lauriere M, Pecquet C, Bouchez-Mahiuot I, Snegaroff J, Bayrou O, Raison-Peyron N, Vigan N. Hydrolyzed wheat proteins present in cosmetics can induce immediate hypersensitivities. Contact Dermatitis. 2006;54:284–9.
Mantoux C. Intradermo réaction de la tuberculine. Comptes rendus de l’académie des sciences. Paris. 1908;147:355–7.
Menardo JL, Bousquet J, Michel FB. Comparison of three prick test methods with the intradermal test and with the rats in the diagnosis of mite allergy. Ann Allergy. 1982;48:235–9.
Pepys J. Skin testing. Br J Hosp Med. 1975;14:412.
Pons-Guiraud A. Contre-indications des tests épicutanés. In: Progrès en dermato- allergologie: 16ème Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 229–32.
Raison PN. Faut-il faire systématiquement des ajouts à la batterie standard d’épidermotests? Revue Française d’Allergologie. 2012;52(3):164–7.
Rancé F, Dutau G. Labial food challenge in children with food allergy. Ped Allergy lmmunol. 1997;8:41–4.
Salverda JG, Bragt PJC, de Wit-Bos L, Rustemeyer T, Coenraads PJ, Tupker RA, Kunkeler LC, et al. Results of a cosmetovigilance survey in The Netherlands. Contact Dermatitis. 2013;68:139–48.
Svedman C, Isaksson M, Björk J, Mowitz M, Bruze M. Calibration of our patch reading technique is necessary. Contact Dermatitis. 2012;66:180–7.
Van Ketel WG. Patch tests: methodology, standardization and significance of positive results. Arch Belg Dermatol. 1973;28:73–82.
Vigan M. Critères de lecture des tests epicutanés. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 16e Cours d’actualisation en dermato- allergologie du GERDA, Arcachon. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1995. p. 245–5.
Vigan M. La lecture tardive des patch- tests. In: Progrès en dermato-allergologie: 17e Cours d’actualisation en dermato-allergologie du GERDA, Bâle. Paris: John Libbey Eurotext; 1996. p. 109–17.
Vigan M, Brechat N, Girardin P, Vuitton DA, Laurent R. An alternative to animal testing active cosmetovigilance. In: Jadassohn Centenary Congress of the European Society of Contact dermatitis and the American contact dermatitis Society, London, 9–12 Oct 1996 (Abstract 166).
Vigan M, Girardin P, Adessi B, Laurent R. Late reading of patch tests. Eur J Dermatol. 1997;7:574–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Vigan, M. (2015). Cutaneous Testing: Detection and Assessment of Allergy. In: Humbert, P., Maibach, H., Fanian, F., Agache, P. (eds) Agache’s Measuring the Skin. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26594-0_68-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26594-0_68-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26594-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine