Abstract
Aging, photoaging, dryness, and skin thickness (following a proliferative response) play an important role in changes or loss of skin elasticity. Although the changes in the mechanical properties of the skin have proved to be difficult to document but not impossible. It is very important to mention that the mechanical properties of the skin are not uniform in all directions, and there is a need to understand this angular anisotropy. We can document skin anisotropy by measuring the propagation time of a shear wave between two piezoelectric transducer sensors placed on the surface of the skin. Based on velocity and dispersion of the acoustic waves, we can obtain information about local density and tension of the tissue. We find that with increasing age, the anisotropy increases, while the angular dispersion width decreases. The ratio of these values provides a sensitive parameter for the assessment of the directional behavior of the skin mechanical properties. This parameter provides a large effective dynamic range capable of demonstrating close to an order of magnitude difference in skin viscoelasticity from infants up to 75 years of age. Also the direction of the angular anisotropy relates to the direction of the dermal cleavage lines as defined by Langer. Topical application of moisturizers can change the stratum corneum tension, plasticize the stratum corneum, and decrease the tensions induced by skin dryness. This methodology is most sensitive to the density and tension supported by the superficial layers of the skin: the stratum corneum and the viable epidermis.
Nikiforos Kollias has retired.
References
ASTM. D2240-03 standard test method for rubber property – durometer hardness. West Conshohocken: ASTM International; 2003.
Biscoe B, Sebastian K. Analysis of the “durometer” indentation. Rubber Chem Technol. 1993;66:827–36.
Cox H. The cleavage lines of the skin. Br J Surg. 1942;29:234–40.
Dahlgren R, Elsnau W. Measurement of skin condition by sonic velocity. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 1986;35:1–9.
Dorogi PL, DeWitt GM, Stone BR, Buras Jr EM. Viscoelastometry of skin in vivo using shear wave propagation. Bioeng Skin. 1986;2:59–70.
Doukas AG, Soukos NS, Babusis S, Appa Y, Kollias N. Fluorescence excitation spectroscopy for the measurement of epidermal proliferation. Photochem Photobiol. 2001;74(1):96–102.
Elsner P. Skin elasticity. In: Bardesca E, Elsner P, Wilhelm K, Maibach H, editors. Bioengineering of the skin: methods and instrumentation. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1995.
Gibson T, Stark H, Evans J. Directional variation in extensibility of human skin in vivo. J Biomech. 1969;2:201–4.
Jansen L, Rottier PB. Elasticity of human skin related to age. Dermatologica. 1957;115:106–11.
Kollias N, Gilles R, Moran M, Kochevar IE, Anderson RR. Endogenous skin fluorescence includes bands that may serve as quantitative markers of aging and photoaging. J Invest Dermatol. 1998;111(5):776–80.
Langer K. Zur Anatomie und Physiologie der Haut: I. Uber die Splatbarkeit der Cutis. Sitzungber Akad Wiss Wien. 1861;44:19–46.
Lavker RM, Zheng PS, Dong G. Aged skin: a study by light, transmission electron, and scanning electron microscopy. J Invest Dermatol. 1987;88:44s–51.
Mridha M, Odman S, Oberg PA. Mechanical pulse wave propagation in gel, normal and oedematous tissues. J Biomech. 1992;25:1213–8.
Nizet JL, Pierard-Franchimont C, Pierard GE. Influence of body posture and gravitational forces on shear wave propagation in the skin. Dermatology. 2001;202:177–80.
Potts RO, Chrisman DA, Burns EM. The dynamic mechanical properties of human skin in vivo. J Biomech. 1983;16:365–72.
Rodrigues L. EEMCO guidance to the in vivo assessment of tensile functional properties of the skin. Part 2: instrumentation and test modes. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2001;14:52–67.
Russell M, Lee C, Ruvolo E. Stratum corneum hydration and barrier benefits with glycerin on xerotic skin. Proceedings of Stratum Corneum VII. Cardiff, UK. 2012.
Ruvolo Jr E, Kollias N. Assessment of mechanical properties of skin by shear wave propagation and acoustic dispersion. In: Berardesca E, Maibach H, Wilhelm K, editors. Non invasive diagnostic techniques in clinical dermatology. Berlin: Springer; 2014. p. 233–50. DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-32109-2_21.
Ruvolo Jr EC, Stamatas GN, Kollias N. Skin viscoelasticity displays site- and age-dependent angular anisotropy. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2007;20:313–21.
Serup J, Jemec G, Grove G. Handbook of non-invasive methods and the skin. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2006.
Lanir Y. Skin mechanics. In: Skalak R, Chien S, editors. Handbook of bioengineering. New York: MacGraw-Hill; 1986. p. 11.11–24.
Stamatas GN, Estanislao RB, Suero M, Rivera ZS, Li J, Khait A, Kollias N. Facial skin fluorescence as a marker of the skin’s response to chronic environmental insults and its dependence on age. Br J Dermatol. 2006;154:25–132.
Takakuda K, Miyairi H. Tensile behaviour of fibroblasts cultured in collagen gel. Biomaterials. 1996;17:1393–7.
Tronnier H. Dermatologisch-phamakologische Methoden zur Prüfung kosmeticher Präparate und Grundstoffe. Ärzliche Kosmotogie. 1980;10:361–7.
Vexler A, Polyansky I, Gorodetsky R. Evaluation of skin viscoelasticity and anisotropy by measurement of speed of shear wave propagation with viscoelasticity skin analyzer. J Investig Dermatol. 1999;113:732–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Ruvolo, E., Lee, C., Kollias, N. (2015). Skin Viscoelasticity by Acoustic Velocity and Dispersion: Effects of Tension in Stratum Corneum. In: Humbert, P., Maibach, H., Fanian, F., Agache, P. (eds) Measuring the Skin. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26594-0_132-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26594-0_132-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26594-0
eBook Packages: Springer Reference MedicineReference Module Medicine