Skip to main content

A Review and Comparison of Service E-Contract Architecture Metamodels

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Neural Information Processing (ICONIP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9492))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

An adaptive service e-contract is an electronic agreement which is required to enable adaptive or agile service sourcing and provisioning. There are a number of e-contract metamodels that can be used to create a context specific adaptive service e-contract. The challenge is which one to choose and adopt for adaptive services. This paper presents a review and comparison of well-known e-contract metamodels using the architecture theory. The architecture theory allows the analysis of the e-contract metamodels using a three-dimension analytical lens: structure, behavior and technology. The results of this paper highlight the metamodels structural, behavioral and technological differences and similarities. This paper will help researchers and practitioners to observe whether the existing e-contract metamodels are appropriate to the adaptive services or if there is a need to merge and integrate the concepts of these metamodels to propose a new unifying adaptive service e-contract metamodel. This paper is limited to the number of compared metamodels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pourdehnad, J., Bharathy, G.K.: Systems thinking and its implications in organizational transformation. In: 3rd International Conference on Systems Thinking in Management, Philadelphia, PA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gruhl, D., Bailey, J., Spohrer, J., Maglio, P.: Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer 1, 71–77 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gill, A.Q.: Applying agility and living service systems thinking to enterprise architecture. Int. J. Intell. Inf. Technol. (IJIIT) 10(1), 1–15 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, R.L.: The design of business: why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business Press, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Klenk, A., Beck-Greinwald, A., Angst, H., Carle, G.: Iterative multi-party agreement negotiation for establishing collaborations. Serv. Oriented Comput. Appl. 6(4), 321–335 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiu, D.K., Cheung, S.-C., Till, S.: A three-layer architecture for e-contract enforcement in an e-service environment. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003, pp. 10. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Corbin, J., Strauss, A.: Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Krishna, P.R., Karlapalem, K.: A methodology for evolving e-contracts using templates. IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput. 6(4), 497–510 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Karlapalem, K., Dani, A.R., Krishna, P.R.: A frame work for modeling electronic contracts. In: Conceptual ModelingâĂŤER 2001, Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 193–207 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krishna, P.R., Karlapalem, K., Chiu, D.K.: An erec framework for e-contract modeling, enactment and monitoring. Data Knowl. Eng. 51(1), 31–58 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yu, X., Chai, Y., Liu, Y.: A secure model for electronic contract enactment, monitoring and management. In: Second International Symposium on Electronic Commerce and Security, 2009 ISECS 2009, vol. 1, pp. 296–300. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Guizzardi, G., Wagner, G.: Towards ontological foundations for agent modelling concepts using the unified fundational ontology (UFO). Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Gangemi, A., Guarino, N., Masolo, C., Oltramari, A., Schneider, L.: Sweetening ontologies with DOLCE. Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management: Ontologies and the Semantic Web. LNCS, vol. 2473. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Guarino, N.: Formal ontology in information systems. In: Proceedings of the first international conference (FOIS 1998), June 6–8, Trento, Italy, vol. 46, IOS press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Semy, S.K., Pulvermacher, M.K., Obrst, L.J.: Toward the use of an upper ontology for us government and us military domains: An evaluation. Technical Report, DTIC Document (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Braytee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Braytee, A., Gill, A.Q., Kennedy, P.J., Hussain, F.K. (2015). A Review and Comparison of Service E-Contract Architecture Metamodels. In: Arik, S., Huang, T., Lai, W., Liu, Q. (eds) Neural Information Processing. ICONIP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9492. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26561-2_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26561-2_69

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26560-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26561-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics