Abstract
The importance of the optimal Sensor Resource Management (SRM) problem is growing. The number of Radar, EO/IR, Overhead Persistent InfraRed (OPIR), and other sensors with best capabilities, is limited in the stressing tasking environment relative to sensing needs. Sensor assets differ significantly in number, location, and capability over time. To determine on which object a sensor should collect measurements during the next observation period k, the known algorithms favor the object with the expected measurements that would result in the largest gain in relative information. We propose a new tasking paradigm OPTIMA for sensors that goes beyond information gain. It includes Sensor Resource Analyzer, and the Sensor Tasking Algorithm (Tasker). The Tasker maintains timing constraints, resolution, and geometric differences between sensors, relative to the tasking requirements on track quality and the measurements of object characterization quality. The Tasker does this using the computational intelligence approach of multi-objective optimization, which involves evolutionary methods.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbass, H.A., Bender, A.: The Pareto operating curve for risk minimization. Artif. Life Robot. J. Springer 14(4), 449–452 (2009)
Burgess, D., Levins, C.: Intelligent sensor resource management using evolutionary computing techniques. In: Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems/KIMAS, pp. 325–329 (2003)
Borndörer, R.M.: Designing telecommunication networks by integer programming (2012)
Bar-Shalom, Y., Li, X.R., Kirubarajan, T.: Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. Wiley, New York (2001)
Castanon, D.A.: Approximate dynamic programming for sensor management. In: Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (1997)
Cornuejols, G.: Valid inequalities for mixed integer linear programs. Math. Program. Ser. B 112, 3–44 (2008)
Junger, M., et al.(eds): 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Junji, K., Makoto, S., Akihiko, S., Kentarou, H., Yutaka, S., Koichi, N., Takashi, M., Tetsuo, K.: Development of 100 mbps-ethernet-based train communication network. In: 9th World Congress on Railway Research, (5), 1–12 (2011)
Hall, D., Llinas, J.: An introduction to multisensor resource management. Proc. IEEE 85(1), 6–23 (1997)
Hanlon, N., Cohen, K., Kivelevitch, E.: Sensor resource management to support UAS integration into the national airspace system. In: AIAA (2015) http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.2015-0360
Hero, A., Cochran, D.: Sensor management: past. Present Future. IEEE Sensors J. 11(12), 3064–3075 (2011)
Hero, A., Keucher, C., Blatt, D.: Information theoretic approaches to sensor management. In: Hero, A., Castanon, D., Cochran, D., Kastella, K. (eds.) Foundations and Applications of Sensor Management, New York: Springer (2008) 33–57
Hero, A., Castanon, D., Cochran, D., Kastella K., (eds.): Foundations and Applications of Sensor Management. Chapter 3, pp. 33–58. Springer (2007)
Kovalerchuk, B.: Summation of Linguistic Numbers, In: NAFIPS IEEE, (2015) (in print)
Kovalerchuk, B., Perlovsky, L., Wheeler, G.: Modeling of phenomena and dynamic logic of phenomena. J. Appl. Non-classical Logics 22(1), 51–82 (2012)
Kovalerchuk, B.: Interpretable fuzzy systems: analysis of T-norm interpretability. In: 2010 IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence, Barcelona (2010) doi:10.1109/FUZZY.2010.5584837
Kovalerchuk, B., Triantaphyllou, E., Despande, A.S., Vityaev, E.: Interactive learning of monotone boolean functions. Inf. Sci. 94(1–4), 87–118 (1996)
Kreucher, C., Hero, A., Kastella, K., Morelande, M.: An information-based approach to sensor management in large dynamic networks. Proc. IEEE 95(5), 978–999 (2007)
Kreucher, C., Hero, A., Kastella, K.: A comparison of task driven and information driven sensor management for target tracking. In: 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 4004–4009 (2005)
Kreucher, C., Hero, A., Kastella, K., Chang, D.: Efficient method of non-myopic sensor management for multi-target tracking. In: 43rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 722–727 (2004)
Lambert, H.C., Sinno, D.: Bioinspired Resource Management for Multi-Sensor object Tracking Systems. MIT Lincoln Laboratory Project Report MD-26 (2011)
Liggins, M., Hall, D., Llinas, J. (eds): Handbook of Multisensor Resource Management. CRC, Boca Raton (2008)
Manyika, L., Durrant-Whyte, H.: Data Fusion and Sensor Management: A Decentralized Information-Theoretic Approach. Ellis Ilorwood, New York (1994)
Pastor, J.: Mathematical Ecology of Populations and Ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester (2008)
Patsikas, D.: Track Score Processing of Multiple Dissimilar Sensors. NPS, Monterey CA (2007)
Perillo, M., Heinzelman, W.: Sensor Management. Wireless Sensor Networks, pp. 351–372. Springer, Berlin (2004)
Perlovsky, L., Deming, R.W.: Maximum likelihood joint tracking and association in a strong clutter without combinatorial complexity. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. 9, 1–9 (2013)
Perlovsky, L.: Cramer-Rao bound for tracking in clutter and tracking multiple objects. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 18(3), 283–288 (1997)
Perlovsky, L.: Conundrum of combinatorial complexity. IEEE Trans. PAMI 20(6), 666–670 (1998)
Severson, T., Paley, D.: Optimal sensor coordination for multiobject search and track assignment. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 50(3), 2313–2320 (2014)
Shea, P., Kirk, J., Welchons, D.: Adaptive sensor management for multiple missions. In: Proceeding of SPIE 7330, Sensors and Systems for Space Applications III, 73300M, doi:10.1117/12.818892 (2009)
Smith III, J.F., Nguyen, T.V.H.: Distributed autonomous systems: resource management, planning, and control algorithms. Proc. SPIE vol. 5809, p. 65 (2005)
Smith III, J.F., Nguyen, T.V.H.: Fuzzy Logic Based UAV Allocation and Coordination, p. 11. DTIC, Naval Research Lab Washington, Washington (2006)
Tharmarasa, R., Kirubarajan, T., Sinha, A., Lang, T.: Decentralized sensor selection for large-scale multisensor-multiobject tracking. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 47(2), 1307–1324 (2011)
Tian, X., Bar-Shalom, Y.: Exact algorithms for four track-to-track resource management configurations: all you wanted to know but were afraid to ask. In: 12th International Conference on Information Fusion, pp. 537–554. Seattle, USA (2009)
Van Gils, J.: Digestive bottleneck affects foraging decisions in red knots Calidris canutus. I. prey choice. J. Anim. Ecol. 74(1), 120–130 (2005)
Vanderbeck, F., Wolsey, L.: Reformulation and decomposition of integer programs. In: Junger, M. Liebling, T. et al. (eds) 50 Years of Integer Programming 1958–2008, pp. 431–504. Springer, Berlin (2010)
Verlinden, C., Wiley, R.H.: The constraints of digestive rate: An alternative model of diet selection. Evol. Ecol. 3(3), 264–273 (1989)
Weir, B.S., Sokol, T.M.: Radar coordination and resource management in a distributed sensor network using emergent control. Proc. SPIE 7350, 73500I (2009)
Zadeh, L.: Berkeley Initiative on Soft Computing/BISC group, http://mybisc.blogspot.com Accessed 04 July 2014
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kovalerchuk, B., Perlovsky, L. (2016). Sensor Resource Management: Intelligent Multi-objective Modularized Optimization Methodology and Models. In: Abielmona, R., Falcon, R., Zincir-Heywood, N., Abbass, H. (eds) Recent Advances in Computational Intelligence in Defense and Security. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 621. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26450-9_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26450-9_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-26448-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-26450-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)