Skip to main content

The Influence of Boundary Depth on Phrase-Final Lengthening in Russian

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Statistical Language and Speech Processing (SLSP 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9449))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

As shown for many languages, words are lengthened at ends of major prosodic boundaries, and the lengthening effect is most prominent at ends of intonational phrases and utterances. However, it is not clear whether the deeper boundary—end of utterance—shows more lengthening than the other one—end of intonational phrase. The present paper is aimed at answering this question by analysing the duration of Russian stressed and post-stressed vowels in open and closed syllables in words immediately preceding prosodic boundaries; the study is based on corpus data. The results show that for most speakers boundary depth only affects the lengthening of absolute-final vowels, either stressed or post-stressed; vowels in closed or penultimate syllables show similar lengthening effect for both types of boundaries. Additionally, our data show that in Russian stressed vowels are the main carriers of final lengthening, compared to post-stressed vowels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Despite the fact that pauses are often used to mark prosodic boundaries, it was not uncommon in our corpus to onserve short IP-internal pauses. Since the role of these short pauses is no quite clear so far, we decided to refrain from analysing IPs with internal pauses.

References

  1. Cambier-Langeveld, T.: Temporal marking of accents and boundaries. University of Amsterdam (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper, W.E., Danly, M.: Segmental and temporal aspects of utterance-final lengthening. Phonetica 38(1–3), 106–115 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Flege, J.E., Brown Jr., W.S.: Effects of utterance position on English speech timing. Phonetica 39(6), 337–357 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kachkovskaia, T.: Phrase-final lengthening in Russian: pre-boundary or pre-pausal? In: Ronzhin, A., Potapova, R., Delic, V. (eds.) SPECOM 2014. LNCS, vol. 8773, pp. 353–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kachkovskaia, T., Volskaya, N.: Phrase-final segment lengthening in Russian: preliminary results of a corpus-based study. In: Železný, M., Habernal, I., Ronzhin, A. (eds.) SPECOM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8113, pp. 257–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kachkovskaia, T., Volskaya, N., Skrelin, P.: Final lengthening in Russian: a corpus-based study. In: Proceedings of INTERSPEECH-2013. ISCA, pp. 1438–1442 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Nakai, S., Kunnari, S., Turk, A., Suomi, K., Ylitalo, R.: Utterance-final lengthening and quantity in Northern Finnish. J. Phonetics 37(1), 29–45 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oller, D.K.: The effect of position in utterance on speech segment duration in English. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54(5), 1235–1247 (1973)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Shepherd, M.A.: The scope and effects of preboundary prosodic lengthening in Japanese. USC Working Pap. Linguist. 4, 1–14 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Skrelin, P.A., Volskaya, N.B., Kocharov, D., Evgrafova, K., Glotova, O., Evdokimova, V.: A fully annotated corpus of Russian speech. In: Proceedings of the Seventh conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC’10), pp. 109–112. European Language Resources Association (ELRA) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Turk, A., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S.: Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. J. Phonetics 35, 445–472 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wightman, C.W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, S., Ostendorf, M., Price, P.J.: Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 91(3), 1707–1717 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research is supported by the Russian Science Foundation (reserch grant # 14-18-01352).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tatiana Kachkovskaia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kachkovskaia, T. (2015). The Influence of Boundary Depth on Phrase-Final Lengthening in Russian. In: Dediu, AH., Martín-Vide, C., Vicsi, K. (eds) Statistical Language and Speech Processing. SLSP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9449. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25789-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25789-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25788-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25789-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics