Abstract
The notion of Person was one of the novelties brought by Christianity. This notion played a central role in the formulation of a new understanding of man, but first and foremost, of a new understanding of God. The consequences of this new description of God and man are really extraordinary for the formation of modern mentality. If the origin of the notion comes from patristic times, a careful investigation into how it was constituted and shaped within this horizon offers us the grounds to better understand our relation with self, otherness, and God. But the indistinct superposition of some significations of this notion, which come from different ages and perspectives, has led to its rather imprecise and sometimes improper use. It is important today to clarify the notions of person that have been accepted thus far and there is a very interesting notion of person in the Byzantine and the post-Byzantine tradition (of what we call now the Eastern European region). To consider the human mode of existence as a type of reality, means to consider the person not as an aggregate of different parts (body-soul, etc.) but something distinct, and distinct from any other kind of existence. This understanding can provide interesting answers to the contemporary questions about the description and the understanding of God, or about the status and the meaning of human existence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blowers, Paul M. 1991. Exegesis and spiritual pedagogy in Maximus the Confessor. An investigation of the Quaestiones ad Thalassium. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Gregory of Nazianzus. 1853. Oration 45. In Patrologiae Cursus Completus. Series Graeca, ed. Jacques-Paul Migne, vol. 36. Paris: Imprimerie Catolique.
Harisson, Verna E.F. 1992. Grace and human freedom according to St. Gregory of Nyssa. New York: Edwin Mellen Press.
Lossky, Vladimir. 1976. The mystical theology of the eastern church. Crestwood/New York: St Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
Nellas, Panayotis. 1987. Deification in Christ: Orthodox Perspectives on the Nature of the Human Person. Trans. Norman Russell. Crestwood: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
Scrima, Andre. 2005. Antropologia apofatică (Apophatic Anthropology). București: Humanitas.
Stăniloae, Dumitru. 1990. Studii de teologie dogmatică ortodoxă (Orthodox dogmatic theology studies). Craiova: Ed. Mitropoliei Craiovei.
Thurnberg, Lars. 1995. Microcosm and mediator: The theological anthropology of Maximus the Confessor. Chicago: Open Court.
Törönen, Melchisedec. 2007. Union and distinction in the thought of St. Maximus the Confessor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yannaras, Christos. 2007. Person and Eros. Trans. Norman Russell. Brookline: Holy Cross Orthodox Press.
Zizioulas, Ioannis. 1985. Being as communion: Studies in personhood and the Church. New York: St. Vladimir’s Seminary Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chițoiu, D. (2016). The Patristic Notion of Person and Its Importance for Modern Culture. In: Tālivaldis Ozoliņš, J. (eds) Religion and Culture in Dialogue. Sophia Studies in Cross-cultural Philosophy of Traditions and Cultures, vol 15. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25724-2_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25724-2_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25722-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25724-2
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)