Abstract
With increasing production of, and access to, research evidence, umbrella reviews are gaining prominence as a structured and systematic means for summarising the best, high-level evidence to answer a clinical and review question. Umbrella reviews may act as an important, timely and efficient resource as, due to its very nature, it summarises existing reviews through a systematic, rigorous, transparent and universally recognised set of processes. Allied health and complementary and alternate medicine comprise of a collective of health-care professions which are uniquely diverse, in terms of their roles and responsibilities, and yet are grouped under the umbrella term “allied health” and “complementary and alternate medicine”. Umbrella reviews, as a methodology to systematically review the best research evidence, is in its infancy in these professions. This chapter summarises four purposively selected umbrella reviews conducted in allied health and complementary and alternate medicine and discusses some of the opportunities and challenges in undertaking umbrella reviews within this field.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Armstrong BK, Gillespie JA, Leeder SR, Rubin GL, Russell LM. Challenges in health and health care for Australia. Med J Aust. 2007;187(9):485–9.
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. Br Med J. 1996;312:71–2.
Hoffmann T, Bennett S, Del Mar C. Evidence-based practice across the health professions. Sydney, Australia: Elsevier; 2001.
Australian Government: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines- stage 2 consultation. Australia: Canberra; 2009.
Thomas SW, McLean L, Debnam A. The role of allied health in health care reform. N C Med J. 2011;72(5):417–9.
Turnbull C, Grimmer-Somers K, Kumar S, May E, Law D, Ashworth E. Allied, scientific and complementary health professionals: a new model for australian ‘allied health’. Aust Health Rev. 2009;33(1):27–37.
Coulter ID, Willis EM. The rise and rise of complementary and alternative medicine: a sociological perspective. Med J Aust. 2004;180(11):587–9.
Zollman C, Vickers A. What is complementary medicine? Br Med J. 1999;319:693.
Zhang W, Pritzker SE, Hui KK. Factors affecting definitions of and approaches to integrative medicine: a mixed methods study examining China’s integrative medicine development. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/458765.
Dixon J, Biehal N, Green J, Sinclair I, Kay C, Parry E. Trials and tribulations: challenges and prospects for randomized controlled trials of social work with children. Br J Soc Work. 2014;44:1563–81.
Blackwood B. Methodological issues in evaluating complex healthcare interventions. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(5):612–22.
Dutta J, Petticrew M. Challenges to evaluating complex interventions: a content analysis of published papers. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:568.
Wells M, Wiliams B, Treweek S, Coyle J, Taylor J. Intervention description is not enough: evidence from an in-depth multiple case study on the untold role and impact of context in randomised controlled trials of seven complex interventions. Trials. 2012;13:95. doi:10.1186/1745-6215-13-95.
Broeder J, Donze A. The role of qualitative research in evidence-based practice. Neonatal Netw. 2010;3:197–202(6).
Torgerson CJ. Publication bias: the achilles heel of systematic reviews? Br J Educ Stud. 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00332.x.
Morrison A, Polisena J, Husereau D, Moulton K, Clark M, Fiander M, Mierzwinski-Urban M, Clifford T, Hutton B, Rabb D. The effect of English-language restriction on systematic review-based meta-analyses: a systematic review of empirical studies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012;28(2):138–44. doi:10.1017/S0266462312000086.
Kumar S, Beaton K, Hughes T. The effectiveness of massage therapy for the treatment of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Int J Gen Med. 2013. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S50243.
Bidonde J, Busch AJ, Bath B, Milosavljevic S. Exercise for adults with fibromyalgia: an umbrella systematic review with synthesis of best evidence. Curr Rheumatol Rev. 2014;10:45–79.
Ernst E, Canter PH. A systematic review of systematic reviews of spinal manipulation. J R Soc Med. 2006;99:192–6.
Gilbey A, Ernst E, Tani K. A systematic review of reviews of systematic reviews of acupuncture. Focus Altern Complement Ther. 2013. doi:10.1111/fct.12004.
Kendall S. What do we mean by evidence? Implication for primary health care nursing. J Interprof Care. 1997;11(1):23–34.
Milanese S. The use of RCT’s in manual therapy – are we trying to fit a round peg into a square hole? Man Ther. 2011. doi:10.1016/j.math.2011.02.007.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kumar, S. (2016). Case Study of Allied Health and Complementary and Alternate Medicine. In: Biondi-Zoccai, G. (eds) Umbrella Reviews. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25655-9_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-25653-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-25655-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)