Skip to main content

Multi-attribute Decision Making Under Risk Based on Third-Generation Prospect Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques (IScIDE 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 9243))

  • 2842 Accesses

Abstract

A method of multi-attribute decision making under risk (MADMUR) based on third-generation prospect theory (PT3) is presented to solve the decision making problems by allowing reference points of each attribute to be uncertain. First, some important properties of PT3 are defined. Second, the adaptation of uncertain reference point is represented specifically. Then, the MADMUR method and its relevant computing steps are illustrated including all required definitions of MADMUR, an psychological inference procedure with relative value function and relative cumulative decision weighting function, and ranking and ordering decision alternatives etc. Finally, an illustrative example is given to show this decision making method in detail.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Simon, H., Dantzig, G., Hogarth, R., Plott, C., Raiffa, H., Shelling, T., Shepsle, K., Thaler, R., Tversky, A., Winter, S.: Decision making and problem solving. Interfaces 17, 11–31 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang, Z.J., Ou, C.W., Li, S.: Integrative model or the priority heuristic? A test from the point of view of the equate-to-differentiate model. Acta Psychol. Sin. 42(08), 821–833 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Birnbaum, M.H.: New paradoxes of risky decision making. Psychol. Rev. 115, 463–501 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, E.J., Schulte, M., Willemsen, M.C.: Process models deserve process data: comment on Brandstatter, Gigerenzer and Hertwig. Psychol. Rev. 115, 263–273 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmidt, U., Starmer, C., Sugden, R.: Third-generation prospect theory. J. Risk Uncertainty 36, 203–223 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Von Neumann, J., Morgensterm, O.: The Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Savage, J.: The Foundations of Statistics. Wiley, New York (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Edwards, W.: The theory of decision making. Psychol. Bull. 51, 380–417 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Machina, M.J.: Expected utility analysis without the independence axiom. Econometrica 50(2), 277–323 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Bell, D.E.: Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper. Res. 30, 961–981 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Loomes, G., Sugden, R.: Regret theory: an alternative theory of rational choice under uncertainty. Econ. J. 92, 805–824 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kahneman, D., Tversky, A.: Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2), 263–291 (1979)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Quiggin, J.A.: Theory of anticipated utility. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3(4), 323–343 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. J. Risk Uncertain. 5(4), 297–323 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sugden, R.: Reference-dependent subjective expected utility. J. Econ. Theor. 111, 172–191 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ordonez, L.D., Connolly, T., Coughlian, R.: Multiple reference points in satisfaction and fairness assessment. J. Behav. Decis. Mak. 13, 329–344 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty, pp. 44–65. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Zeng, J.M.: An experimental test of cumulative prospect theory. J. Jinan Univ. (Nat. Sci.) 28(1), 44–47 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Xiang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Xiang, Y., Ma, L. (2015). Multi-attribute Decision Making Under Risk Based on Third-Generation Prospect Theory. In: He, X., et al. Intelligence Science and Big Data Engineering. Big Data and Machine Learning Techniques. IScIDE 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9243. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_43

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23862-3_43

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23861-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23862-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics