Abstract
The relationship between a physician and his or her patient is the heart of medicine. The quality of this relationship is strongly influenced by the doctor’s communication skills and in turn has an impact on patient outcomes as well as on physician factors such as satisfaction, burnout, and malpractice risk. This chapter also explores the importance of patient education and ensuring understanding and reviews how to deliver bad news using the SPIKES model. Vignettes that highlight these learning issues will be presented, and readers will be invited to apply the problem-based approach to work through these vignettes.
“The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease.”—Osler
*Co-first editor of the book
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist, 5(4), 302–311.
Balint, M. (1955). The doctor, the patient, and his illness. The Lancet, 265(6866), 683–688.
Beckman, H. B., & Frankel, R. M. (1984). The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 101, 692–696.
Beckman, H. B., Markakis, K. M., Suchman, A. L., & Frankel, R. M. (1994). The doctor-patient relationship and medical malpractice: Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154, 1365–1370.
Bender, F. F. (2007). “I’m sorry” laws and medical liability. Virtual Mentor, 9, 300–304.
Bensing, J. (1991). Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 32(11), 1301–1310.
Berlin, E. A., & Fowkes, W. C., Jr. (1983). A teaching framework for cross-cultural health care. The Western Journal of Medicine, 139, 934–938.
DelCanale, S., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2012). The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: An empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1243–1249.
DiBlasi, Z., Harkness, E., Ernst, E., Georgiou, A., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Influence of context effects n health outcomes: A systematic review. The Lancet, 357, 757–762.
DiMatteo, M. R., & DiNicola, D. (1982). Achieving patient compliance: The psychology of the medical practitioner’s role. New York: Pergamon Press (Patient Education and Counseling, 5(1), 51–51).
Di Matteo, M.R., Sherbourne, C.D., Hays, R.D., Ordway, L., Kravitz, R.L., McGlynn, E.A., Kaplan, S., & Rogers, W.H. (1993). Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychology, 12(2), 93–102.
Duffy, F. D., Gordon, G. H., Whelan, G., Cole-Kelly, K., Frankel, R., et al. (2004). Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: The Kalamazoo II report. Academic Medicine, 79, 495–507.
Dunbar-Jacob, J., Erlen, J. A., Schlenk, E. A., Ryan, C. M., Sereika, S. M., & Doswell, W. M. (2000). Adherence in chronic disease. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 18, 48–90.
Egbert, L.D., Battit, G.E., Welch, C.E., & Bartlett, M.K. (1964). Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients: A study of patient-doctor rapport. New England Journal of Medicine, 270, 825–827.
Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and illness: Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 1, 9–23.
Gertner, R. (2005). The art of apologizing takes hold in the legal world. St. Louis Daily Record, December 22, 2005.
Haskard Zolnierek, K. B., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: A meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826–834.
Henbest, R. J., & Stewart, M. A. (1990). Patient-centeredness in the consultation: Does it really make a difference? Family Practice, 7, 28–33.
Hojat, M., lLouis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011). Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Academic Medicine, 86(3), 359–364.
Jones, J. W., Barge, B. N., Steffy, B. D., Fay, L. M., Kunz, L. D., & Wuebker, L. J. (1988). Stress and medical malpractice: Organizational risk assessment and intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 727–735.
Killila, B. (1990). Improving communications can prevent malpractice. Indiana Medicine, 82, 272–273.
Kleinman, A., Eisenberg, L., & Good, B. (1978). Culture, illness, and care: Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 88, 251–258.
Kohn, K. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (1999). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Krasner, M. S., Epstein, R. M., Beckman, H., Suchman, A. L., Chapman, B., Mooney, C. J., & Quill, T. E. (2009). Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(12), 1284–1293.
Lazare, A. (2006). Apology in medical practice: An emerging clinical skill. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(11), 1401–1404.
Levinson, W., Roter, D. L., Mullooly, J. P., Dull, V. T., & Frankel, R. M. (1997). Physician-patient communication: The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 553–559.
Lindsey, R. B., Nuri-Robins, K., & Terrell, R. D. (2003). Cultural proficiency: A manual for school leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Matthews, D. A., Sledge, W. H., & Lieberman, P. B. (1987). Evaluation of intern performance by medical inpatients. American Journal of Medicine, 35, 936–944.
McDonnell, P. J., & Jacobs, M. R. (2002). Hospital admissions resulting from preventable adverse drug reactions. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 36(9):1331–1336.
McKay, K. M., Imel, Z. E., & Wampold, B. E. (2006). Psychiatrist effects in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 92, 287–290.
Mercer, S. W., & Reynolds, W. J. (2002). Empathy and quality of care. British Journal of General Practice, 52, S9–S13.
Moore, P. J., Adler, N. E., & Robertson, P. A. (2000). Medical malpractice: The effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice claims. Western Journal of Medicine, 173, 244–250.
Neumann, M., Edelhauser, F., Truschel, D., Fischer, M. R., Wirtz, M., Woopen, C., Haramati, A., & Scheffer, C. (2011). Empathy decline and its reasons: A systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Academic Medicine, 86(8), 996–1009.
Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005). Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 487–497.
Rakel, D., Barett, B., Zhang, Z., Hoeft, T., Chewning, B., Marchand, L., & Scheder, J. (2011). Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Education and Counseling, 85(3), 390–397.
Richards, T. (1990). Chasms in communication. British Medical Journal, 301, 1407–1408.
Roter, D. L. (1989). Which facets of communication have strong effects on outcome—a meta-analysis. In M. Stewart & D. Roter (Eds.), Communicating with medical patients. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A., & Katz, N. R. (1987). Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall and impressions. Medical Care, 25, 437–451.
Schouten, B. C., & Meeuwessen L. (2006). Cultural differences in medical communication: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 64, 21–34.
Shapiro, R. S., Simpson, D. E., Lawrence, S. L., Talsky, A. M., Sobocinski, K. A., & Schiedermayer, D. L. (1989). A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 149, 2190–2196.
Smith, C. K., Polis, E., & Hadac, R. R. (1981). Characteristics of the initial medical interview associated with patient satisfaction and understanding. Journal of Family Practice, 12, 283–288.
Tarn, M. T., Heritage, J., Paterniti, D., Hays, R., Kravitz, R., & Wenger, N. (2006). Physician communication when prescribing new medications. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1855–1862.
Weiner, S. J. (2004). Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: Lessons from the qualitative sciences. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 281–285.
Weiner, S. J. (2008). Contextual error. In M. Kattan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of medical decision making (pp. 198–202). London: Sage.
Weiner, S. J., Schwartz, A., Weaver, F., Goldberg, J., Yudkowsky, R., Sharma, G., Binns-Calvey, A., Schapira, M. M., Persell, S. D., Jacobs, E., & Abrams, R. I. (2010). Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: A multicenter study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153, 69–75.
Weiner, S. J., Schwartz, A., Sharma, G., Binns-Calvey, A., Ashley, N., Kelly, B., Dayal, A., Patel, S., Weaver, F. M., & Harris, I. (2013). Patient-centered decision making and health care outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(8), 573–579.
West, C. P., Huschka, M. M., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Kolars, J. C., Haberman, T. M., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(9), 1071–1078.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A: Tables with Possible Answers to the Vignettes
Vignette 8.1: Mark Taylor
Table 8.1.1
Facts | Hypotheses | Information needed | Learning issues |
---|---|---|---|
Mr. Taylor has a CHF exacerbation | Mr. Taylor is not adherent to medications, possibly due to | What does the patient understand about his disease? | What are the factors that affect the doctor–patient relationship? |
Mr. Taylor has frequent ER visits and clinic no-shows | |||
Financial difficulties | Is he taking his medications? Why not? | How does the doctor–patient relationship affect patient outcomes? | |
Mr. Taylor’s medication doses are increased and new medications are added at each visit | Lack of understanding of disease | Why is he not making clinic appointments? | |
You notice that your alliance with Mr. Taylor is poor | Improving the doctor–patient relationship may improve Mr. Taylor’s outcomes |
Table 8.1.2
Facts | Hypotheses | Information needed | Learning issues |
---|---|---|---|
Mr. Taylor is not compliant with medications due to complexity of medication regimen and contextual factors | Medication compliance could be increased by simplifying the medication regimen and by using less costly medications | How can Mr. Taylor’s medication regimen be simplified? | What can physicians do to maximize patient adherence? |
What can Mr. Taylor afford? Can any of his medications be changed to generics so they are more affordable? | How can contextual factors affect patient outcomes? | ||
Financial constraints limit Mr. Taylor’s ability to pay for medications | If nothing changes, Mr. Taylor will end up in the ED and hospital again soon | How can contextual factors be addressed? | |
Mr. Taylor is not following up due to lack of insurance |
Table 8.1.3
Facts | Hypotheses | Information needed | Learning issues |
---|---|---|---|
The medication regimen is simplified by cutting the number of medications needed to half | The strong communication skills you used with Mr. Taylor have improved your doctor–patient relationship, which will increase the likelihood of Mr. Taylor’s adherence | Does Mr. Taylor take his medications and show up for clinic appointments now? | How does a strong doctor–patient relationship affect the physician? |
The remaining medications are switched to generics and the new cost is US$16/month, which Mr. Taylor can afford | More affordable medications are likely to increase adherence | How does taking the time to understand Mr. Taylor’s situation and help him affect your judgments about this patient, how you feel about being a doctor, and your level of burnout? | |
The next appointment is set up through a local outreach clinic, which Mr. Taylor can afford | Simplified medication regimens are likely to increase adherence | ||
Having a follow-up appointment made through a more affordable clinic is likely to increase adherence |
Vignette 8.2: Mrs. Gebreselassie
Table 8.2.1
Facts | Hypotheses | Information needed | Learning issues |
---|---|---|---|
Mrs. Gebreselassie is a 73-year-old Eritean woman who speaks Arabic only | Patient may not be aware of her diagnosis or treatment options due to language or cultural barriers | What does the patient understand about her disease? | How does the patient’s cultural and religious background affect her treatment considerations? |
She is not aware of her cancer diagnosis, and you need to tell her the bad news | Patient may have good reasons for declining surgery, but you have not explored them | Are language or cultural barriers interfering with the patient’s understanding? | How should the provider deliver the bad news about the patient’s diagnosis? |
Her cancer has not spread, and it can be cured by surgery | Why has the patient declined surgery? Are there other forms of treatment she may accept? | ||
Patient declines surgery without offering an explanation |
Table 8.2.2
Facts | Hypotheses | Information needed | Learning issues |
---|---|---|---|
The cancer has spread, possibly as a result of declining surgery | You made a medical error by not exploring the patient’s reasons for declining surgery and not offering other treatment options | What was Mrs. Gebreselassie’s reason for declining surgery, and is she open to any treatment options? | What questions should the physician ask to understand the patient’s explanatory model? |
The oncologist wants to know why Mrs. Gebreselassie refused the surgery, and you are now being held accountable by a colleague | Patient may have been open to surgery or other treatment options if you had explored her explanatory model | Does Mrs. Gebreselassie understand her treatment options? | What model could the physician have used to guide a culturally sensitive encounter? |
How can the teach-back method be used to ensure patient understanding? |
Table 8.2.3
Facts | Hypotheses | Information needed | Learning issues |
---|---|---|---|
You failed to address Mrs. Gebreselassie’s refusal in your last visit, and you did not offer alternative treatment options | Mrs. Gebreselassie would have likely agreed to surgery sooner if her concerns had been addressed | Will patient and her family sue you? | Should physicians apologize after a medical error? |
Will an apology affect your risk of being sued? | |||
The patient had religious reasons for not pursuing the surgery | How should physicians offer an apology? | ||
You made a medical error and are at risk for being sued | How does the doctor–patient relationship affect malpractice risk? | ||
You are not sure whether you should apologize for your medical error |
Appendix B: Answers to Review Questions
-
1.
D
-
2.
B
-
3.
C
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jacobs*, N., Calvo, L. (2016). The Physician–Patient Relationship. In: Alicata, D., Jacobs, N., Guerrero, A., Piasecki, M. (eds) Problem-based Behavioral Science and Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23669-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23669-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23668-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23669-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)