Skip to main content

The Physician–Patient Relationship

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Problem-based Behavioral Science and Psychiatry

Abstract

The relationship between a physician and his or her patient is the heart of medicine. The quality of this relationship is strongly influenced by the doctor’s communication skills and in turn has an impact on patient outcomes as well as on physician factors such as satisfaction, burnout, and malpractice risk. This chapter also explores the importance of patient education and ensuring understanding and reviews how to deliver bad news using the SPIKES model. Vignettes that highlight these learning issues will be presented, and readers will be invited to apply the problem-based approach to work through these vignettes.

“The good physician treats the disease; the great physician treats the patient who has the disease.”—Osler

*Co-first editor of the book

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baile, W. F., Buckman, R., Lenzi, R., Glober, G., Beale, E. A., & Kudelka, A. P. (2000). SPIKES—A six-step protocol for delivering bad news: Application to the patient with cancer. Oncologist, 5(4), 302–311.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Balint, M. (1955). The doctor, the patient, and his illness. The Lancet, 265(6866), 683–688.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, H. B., & Frankel, R. M. (1984). The effect of physician behavior on the collection of data. Annals of Internal Medicine, 101, 692–696.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, H. B., Markakis, K. M., Suchman, A. L., & Frankel, R. M. (1994). The doctor-patient relationship and medical malpractice: Lessons from plaintiff depositions. Archives of Internal Medicine, 154, 1365–1370.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bender, F. F. (2007). “I’m sorry” laws and medical liability. Virtual Mentor, 9, 300–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bensing, J. (1991). Doctor-patient communication and the quality of care. Social Science & Medicine, 32(11), 1301–1310.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, E. A., & Fowkes, W. C., Jr. (1983). A teaching framework for cross-cultural health care. The Western Journal of Medicine, 139, 934–938.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • DelCanale, S., Louis, D. Z., Maio, V., Wang, X., Rossi, G., Hojat, M., & Gonnella, J. S. (2012). The relationship between physician empathy and disease complications: An empirical study of primary care physicians and their diabetic patients in Parma, Italy. Academic Medicine, 87(9), 1243–1249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBlasi, Z., Harkness, E., Ernst, E., Georgiou, A., & Kleijnen, J. (2001). Influence of context effects n health outcomes: A systematic review. The Lancet, 357, 757–762.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DiMatteo, M. R., & DiNicola, D. (1982). Achieving patient compliance: The psychology of the medical practitioner’s role. New York: Pergamon Press (Patient Education and Counseling, 5(1), 51–51).

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Matteo, M.R., Sherbourne, C.D., Hays, R.D., Ordway, L., Kravitz, R.L., McGlynn, E.A., Kaplan, S., & Rogers, W.H. (1993). Physicians’ characteristics influence patients’ adherence to medical treatment: Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. Health Psychology, 12(2), 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, F. D., Gordon, G. H., Whelan, G., Cole-Kelly, K., Frankel, R., et al. (2004). Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: The Kalamazoo II report. Academic Medicine, 79, 495–507.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar-Jacob, J., Erlen, J. A., Schlenk, E. A., Ryan, C. M., Sereika, S. M., & Doswell, W. M. (2000). Adherence in chronic disease. Annual Review of Nursing Research, 18, 48–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Egbert, L.D., Battit, G.E., Welch, C.E., & Bartlett, M.K. (1964). Reduction of postoperative pain by encouragement and instruction of patients: A study of patient-doctor rapport. New England Journal of Medicine, 270, 825–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, L. (1977). Disease and illness: Distinctions between professional and popular ideas of sickness. Culture Medicine and Psychiatry, 1, 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gertner, R. (2005). The art of apologizing takes hold in the legal world. St. Louis Daily Record, December 22, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haskard Zolnierek, K. B., & DiMatteo, M. R. (2009). Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: A meta-analysis. Medical Care, 47(8), 826–834.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Henbest, R. J., & Stewart, M. A. (1990). Patient-centeredness in the consultation: Does it really make a difference? Family Practice, 7, 28–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hojat, M., lLouis, D. Z., Markham, F. W., Wender, R., Rabinowitz, C., & Gonnella, J. S. (2011). Physicians’ empathy and clinical outcomes for diabetic patients. Academic Medicine, 86(3), 359–364.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, J. W., Barge, B. N., Steffy, B. D., Fay, L. M., Kunz, L. D., & Wuebker, L. J. (1988). Stress and medical malpractice: Organizational risk assessment and intervention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(4), 727–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killila, B. (1990). Improving communications can prevent malpractice. Indiana Medicine, 82, 272–273.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinman, A., Eisenberg, L., & Good, B. (1978). Culture, illness, and care: Clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Annals of Internal Medicine, 88, 251–258.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, K. T., Corrigan, J. M., & Donaldson, M. S. (1999). To err is human: building a safer health system. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krasner, M. S., Epstein, R. M., Beckman, H., Suchman, A. L., Chapman, B., Mooney, C. J., & Quill, T. E. (2009). Association of an educational program in mindful communication with burnout, empathy, and attitudes among primary care physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association, 302(12), 1284–1293.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lazare, A. (2006). Apology in medical practice: An emerging clinical skill. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(11), 1401–1404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, W., Roter, D. L., Mullooly, J. P., Dull, V. T., & Frankel, R. M. (1997). Physician-patient communication: The relationship with malpractice claims among primary care physicians and surgeons. Journal of the American Medical Association, 277, 553–559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey, R. B., Nuri-Robins, K., & Terrell, R. D. (2003). Cultural proficiency: A manual for school leaders (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maslach, C. (1982). Burnout: The cost of caring. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, D. A., Sledge, W. H., & Lieberman, P. B. (1987). Evaluation of intern performance by medical inpatients. American Journal of Medicine, 35, 936–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, P. J., & Jacobs, M. R. (2002). Hospital admissions resulting from preventable adverse drug reactions. The Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 36(9):1331–1336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, K. M., Imel, Z. E., & Wampold, B. E. (2006). Psychiatrist effects in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 92, 287–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, S. W., & Reynolds, W. J. (2002). Empathy and quality of care. British Journal of General Practice, 52, S9–S13.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, P. J., Adler, N. E., & Robertson, P. A. (2000). Medical malpractice: The effect of doctor-patient relations on medical patient perceptions and malpractice claims. Western Journal of Medicine, 173, 244–250.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, M., Edelhauser, F., Truschel, D., Fischer, M. R., Wirtz, M., Woopen, C., Haramati, A., & Scheffer, C. (2011). Empathy decline and its reasons: A systematic review of studies with medical students and residents. Academic Medicine, 86(8), 996–1009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterberg, L., & Blaschke, T. (2005). Adherence to medication. New England Journal of Medicine, 353, 487–497.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rakel, D., Barett, B., Zhang, Z., Hoeft, T., Chewning, B., Marchand, L., & Scheder, J. (2011). Perception of empathy in the therapeutic encounter: Effects on the common cold. Patient Education and Counseling, 85(3), 390–397.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Richards, T. (1990). Chasms in communication. British Medical Journal, 301, 1407–1408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L. (1989). Which facets of communication have strong effects on outcome—a meta-analysis. In M. Stewart & D. Roter (Eds.), Communicating with medical patients. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roter, D. L., Hall, J. A., & Katz, N. R. (1987). Relations between physicians’ behaviors and analogue patients’ satisfaction, recall and impressions. Medical Care, 25, 437–451.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, B. C., & Meeuwessen L. (2006). Cultural differences in medical communication: A review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling, 64, 21–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, R. S., Simpson, D. E., Lawrence, S. L., Talsky, A. M., Sobocinski, K. A., & Schiedermayer, D. L. (1989). A survey of sued and nonsued physicians and suing patients. Archives of Internal Medicine, 149, 2190–2196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. K., Polis, E., & Hadac, R. R. (1981). Characteristics of the initial medical interview associated with patient satisfaction and understanding. Journal of Family Practice, 12, 283–288.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tarn, M. T., Heritage, J., Paterniti, D., Hays, R., Kravitz, R., & Wenger, N. (2006). Physician communication when prescribing new medications. Archives of Internal Medicine, 166, 1855–1862.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, S. J. (2004). Contextualizing medical decisions to individualize care: Lessons from the qualitative sciences. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19, 281–285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, S. J. (2008). Contextual error. In M. Kattan (Ed.), Encyclopedia of medical decision making (pp. 198–202). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, S. J., Schwartz, A., Weaver, F., Goldberg, J., Yudkowsky, R., Sharma, G., Binns-Calvey, A., Schapira, M. M., Persell, S. D., Jacobs, E., & Abrams, R. I. (2010). Contextual errors and failures in individualizing patient care: A multicenter study. Annals of Internal Medicine, 153, 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner, S. J., Schwartz, A., Sharma, G., Binns-Calvey, A., Ashley, N., Kelly, B., Dayal, A., Patel, S., Weaver, F. M., & Harris, I. (2013). Patient-centered decision making and health care outcomes. Annals of Internal Medicine, 158(8), 573–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • West, C. P., Huschka, M. M., Novotny, P. J., Sloan, J. A., Kolars, J. C., Haberman, T. M., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2006). Association of perceived medical errors with resident distress and empathy: A prospective longitudinal study. Journal of the American Medical Association, 296(9), 1071–1078.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Negar Nicole Jacobs* Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A: Tables with Possible Answers to the Vignettes

Vignette 8.1: Mark Taylor

Table 8.1.1

Facts

Hypotheses

Information needed

Learning issues

Mr. Taylor has a CHF exacerbation

Mr. Taylor is not adherent to medications, possibly due to

What does the patient understand about his disease?

What are the factors that affect the doctor–patient relationship?

Mr. Taylor has frequent ER visits and clinic no-shows

 

 Financial difficulties

Is he taking his medications? Why not?

How does the doctor–patient relationship affect patient outcomes?

Mr. Taylor’s medication doses are increased and new medications are added at each visit

 Lack of understanding of disease

Why is he not making clinic appointments?

 

You notice that your alliance with Mr. Taylor is poor

Improving the doctor–patient relationship may improve Mr. Taylor’s outcomes

  

Table 8.1.2

Facts

Hypotheses

Information needed

Learning issues

Mr. Taylor is not compliant with medications due to complexity of medication regimen and contextual factors

Medication compliance could be increased by simplifying the medication regimen and by using less costly medications

How can Mr. Taylor’s medication regimen be simplified?

What can physicians do to maximize patient adherence?

What can Mr. Taylor afford? Can any of his medications be changed to generics so they are more affordable?

How can contextual factors affect patient outcomes?

Financial constraints limit Mr. Taylor’s ability to pay for medications

If nothing changes, Mr. Taylor will end up in the ED and hospital again soon

How can contextual factors be addressed?

Mr. Taylor is not following up due to lack of insurance

Table 8.1.3

Facts

Hypotheses

Information needed

Learning issues

The medication regimen is simplified by cutting the number of medications needed to half

The strong communication skills you used with Mr. Taylor have improved your doctor–patient relationship, which will increase the likelihood of Mr. Taylor’s adherence

Does Mr. Taylor take his medications and show up for clinic appointments now?

How does a strong doctor–patient relationship affect the physician?

The remaining medications are switched to generics and the new cost is US$16/month, which Mr. Taylor can afford

More affordable medications are likely to increase adherence

How does taking the time to understand Mr. Taylor’s situation and help him affect your judgments about this patient, how you feel about being a doctor, and your level of burnout?

The next appointment is set up through a local outreach clinic, which Mr. Taylor can afford

Simplified medication regimens are likely to increase adherence

Having a follow-up appointment made through a more affordable clinic is likely to increase adherence

Vignette 8.2: Mrs. Gebreselassie

Table 8.2.1

Facts

Hypotheses

Information needed

Learning issues

Mrs. Gebreselassie is a 73-year-old Eritean woman who speaks Arabic only

Patient may not be aware of her diagnosis or treatment options due to language or cultural barriers

What does the patient understand about her disease?

How does the patient’s cultural and religious background affect her treatment considerations?

She is not aware of her cancer diagnosis, and you need to tell her the bad news

Patient may have good reasons for declining surgery, but you have not explored them

Are language or cultural barriers interfering with the patient’s understanding?

How should the provider deliver the bad news about the patient’s diagnosis?

Her cancer has not spread, and it can be cured by surgery

Why has the patient declined surgery? Are there other forms of treatment she may accept?

Patient declines surgery without offering an explanation

Table 8.2.2

Facts

Hypotheses

Information needed

Learning issues

The cancer has spread, possibly as a result of declining surgery

You made a medical error by not exploring the patient’s reasons for declining surgery and not offering other treatment options

What was Mrs. Gebreselassie’s reason for declining surgery, and is she open to any treatment options?

What questions should the physician ask to understand the patient’s explanatory model?

The oncologist wants to know why Mrs. Gebreselassie refused the surgery, and you are now being held accountable by a colleague

Patient may have been open to surgery or other treatment options if you had explored her explanatory model

Does Mrs. Gebreselassie understand her treatment options?

What model could the physician have used to guide a culturally sensitive encounter?

How can the teach-back method be used to ensure patient understanding?

Table 8.2.3

Facts

Hypotheses

Information needed

Learning issues

You failed to address Mrs. Gebreselassie’s refusal in your last visit, and you did not offer alternative treatment options

Mrs. Gebreselassie would have likely agreed to surgery sooner if her concerns had been addressed

Will patient and her family sue you?

Should physicians apologize after a medical error?

Will an apology affect your risk of being sued?

The patient had religious reasons for not pursuing the surgery

How should physicians offer an apology?

You made a medical error and are at risk for being sued

How does the doctor–patient relationship affect malpractice risk?

You are not sure whether you should apologize for your medical error

Appendix B: Answers to Review Questions

  1. 1.

    D

  2. 2.

    B

  3. 3.

    C

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jacobs*, N., Calvo, L. (2016). The Physician–Patient Relationship. In: Alicata, D., Jacobs, N., Guerrero, A., Piasecki, M. (eds) Problem-based Behavioral Science and Psychiatry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23669-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23669-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23668-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23669-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics