Skip to main content

Multiobjective Optimal Control Methods for the Development of an Intelligent Cruise Control

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2014 (ECMI 2014)

Abstract

During the last years, alternative drive technologies, for example electrically powered vehicles (EV), have gained more and more attention, mainly caused by an increasing awareness of the impact of CO2 emissions on climate change and by the limitation of fossil fuels. However, these technologies currently come with new challenges due to limited lithium ion battery storage density and high battery costs which lead to a considerably reduced range in comparison to conventional internal combustion engine powered vehicles. For this reason, it is desirable to increase the vehicle range without enlarging the battery. When the route and the road slope are known in advance, it is possible to vary the vehicles velocity within certain limits in order to reduce the overall drivetrain energy consumption. This may either result in an increased range or, alternatively, in larger energy reserves for comfort functions such as air conditioning. In this presentation, we formulate the challenge of range extension as a multiobjective optimal control problem. We then apply different numerical methods to calculate the so-called Pareto set of optimal compromises for the drivetrain power profile with respect to the two concurrent objectives battery state of charge and mean velocity. In order to numerically solve the optimal control problem by means of a direct method, a time discretization of the drivetrain power profile is necessary. In combination with a vehicle dynamics simulation model, the optimal control problem is transformed into a high dimensional nonlinear optimization problem. For the approximation of the Pareto set, two different optimization algorithms implemented in the software package GAIO are used. The first one yields a global optimal solution by applying a set-oriented subdivision technique to parameter space. By construction, this technique is limited to coarse discretizations of the drivetrain power profile. In contrast, the second technique, which is based on an image space continuation method, is more suitable when the number of parameters is large while the number of objectives is less than five. We compare the solutions of the two algorithms and study the influence of different discretizations on the quality of the solutions. A MATLAB/Simulink model is used to describe the dynamics of an EV. It is based on a drivetrain efficiency map and considers vehicle properties such as rolling friction and air drag, as well as environmental conditions like slope and ambient temperature. The vehicle model takes into account the traction battery too, enabling an exact prediction of the batterys response to power requests of drivetrain and auxiliary loads, including state of charge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Binder, T., Blank, L., Bock, H., Bulirsch, R., Dahmen, W., Diehl, M., Kronseder, T., Marquardt, W., Schlöder, J., Stryk, O.: Introduction to model based optimization of chemical processes on moving horizons. In: Grötschel, M., et al. (ed.) Online Optimization of Large Scale Systems: State of the Art, pp. 295–340. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Coello Coello, C., Lamont, G., Veldhuizen, D.V.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Optimization Problems, 2nd edn. Springer, Boston (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Dellnitz, M., Schütze, O., Hestermeyer, T.: Covering pareto sets by multilevel subdivision techniques. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 124(1), 113–136 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dellnitz, M., Eckstein, J., Flaßkamp, K., Friedel, P., Horenkamp, C., Köhler, U., Ober-Blöbaum, S., Peitz, S., Tiemeyer, S.: Development of an intelligent cruise control using optimal control methods. Proc. Technol. 15, 285–294 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dib, W., Serrao, L., Sciarretta, A.: Optimal control to minimize trip time and energy consumption in electric vehicles. In: Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ehrgott, M.: Multicriteria Optimization, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hellström, E., Åslund, J., Nielsen, L.: Design of an efficient algorithm for fuel-optimal look-ahead control. Control Eng. Pract. 18(11), 1318–1327 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Keichel, M., Schwedes, O.: Das Elektroauto: Mobilität im Umbruch. Springer Vieweg, Wiesbaden (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, S., Li, K., Rajamani, R., Wang, J.: Model predictive multi-objective vehicular adaptive cruise control. IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol. 19(3), 556–566 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Logist, F., Houska, B., Diehl, M., Van Impe, J.: Fast Pareto set generation for nonlinear optimal control problems with multiple objectives. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 42(4), 591–603 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Masjosthusmann, C., Köhler, U., Decius, N., Büker, U.: A vehicle energy management system for a battery electric vehicle. In: Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), pp. 339–344 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ober-Blöbaum, S., Ringkamp, M., Zum Felde, G.: Solving multiobjective optimal control problems in space mission design using discrete mechanics and reference point techniques. In: 51st IEEE International Conference on Decision and Control, pp. 5711–5716 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Petit, N., Sciarretta, A.: Optimal drive of electric vehicles using an inversion-based trajectory generation approach. In: Proceedings of the 18th IFAC World Congress, pp. 14519–14525 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Romaus, C., Bocker, J., Witting, K., Seifried, A., Znamenshchykov, O.: Optimal energy management for a hybrid energy storage system combining batteries and double layer capacitors. In: Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), 2009, pp. 1640–1647. IEEE, Piscataway (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schütze, O., Witting, K., Ober-Blöbaum, S., Dellnitz, M.: Set oriented methods for the numerical treatment of multiobjective optimization problems. In: Tantar, E., Tantar, A.A., Bouvry, P., Del Moral, P., Legrand, P., Coello Coello, C.A., Schütze, O. (eds.) EVOLVE- A Bridge between Probability, Set Oriented Numerics and Evolutionary Computation. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol. 447, pp. 187–219. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sciarretta, A., Guzzella, L.: Control of hybrid electric vehicles. IEEE Control Syst. 27(2), 60–70 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the Leading-Edge Cluster ‘Intelligent Technical Systems OstWestfalenLippe’ (it’s OWL) and managed by the Project Management Agency Karlsruhe (PTKA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sebastian Peitz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dellnitz, M. et al. (2016). Multiobjective Optimal Control Methods for the Development of an Intelligent Cruise Control. In: Russo, G., Capasso, V., Nicosia, G., Romano, V. (eds) Progress in Industrial Mathematics at ECMI 2014. ECMI 2014. Mathematics in Industry(), vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23413-7_87

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics