Skip to main content
  • 578 Accesses

Abstract

Decision makers often struggle with how to make a decision to test everyone or not for a disease. As we all know, health-care decision making must be based on plenty of scientific evidences instead of gambling. On the other hand, any decision might have to take a certain risk because uncertainty always exists in the real world. The key question is how to understand and measure the risk of decision making.

This chapter starts from several relevant concepts in epidemiology, biostatistics, and health econometrics because these concepts are the foundation to understand the entire chapter, such as sensitivity, specificity, incidence, mortality, and cost. Then, this chapter discusses all determinants for testing everyone in detail. Furthermore, a practicable question tool is developed in order to help us make a quick decision on testing everyone or not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement (2008) Ann Intern Med 149:627–637

    Google Scholar 

  2. Medical dictionary (2014) Accessed 29 Aug 2014, at http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com

  3. Rothman JK, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  4. Last JM, Spasoff RA, Harris SS (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diagnostic odds ratio (2014) Accessed 2 Sept 2014, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_odds_ratio

  6. Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K et al (2012) The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:215–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. List of countries by HIV/AIDS adult prevalence rate (2014) Accessed 2 Sept 2014, at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate

  9. Screening for HIV (2013) Accessed 4 Sept 2014, at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspshivi.htm

  10. Rabies (2014) Accessed 4 Sept 2014, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabies

  11. WHO/UNAIDS announce recommendations about male circumcision as HIV prevention. Strategy should be employed with care (2007) AIDS Alert 22:66–67

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lau JT, Zhang J, Yan H et al (2011) Acceptability of circumcision as a means of HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in China. AIDS Care 23:1472–1482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chou R, Selph S, Dana T et al (2012) Screening for HIV: systematic review to update the 2005 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 157:706–718

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucas A, Armbruster B (2013) The cost-effectiveness of expanded HIV screening in the United States. AIDS 27:795–801

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moyer VA (2013) Screening for HIV: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 159:51–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim SK, Lee CH et al (2012) Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28(1):35–41

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. WIKIPEDIA (2014) Sensitivity and specificity. Retrieved 2 Sep 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_and_specificity

  18. Haslwanter T (2014) Statistical data analysis. Retrieved 2 Sept 2014, from http://work.thaslwanter.at/Stats/html/statsTests.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinma Ren PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ren, J. (2016). Epidemiological Principles Applied to CER. In: Asche, C. (eds) Applying Comparative Effectiveness Data to Medical Decision Making. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23329-1_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23329-1_5

  • Publisher Name: Adis, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22064-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23329-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics