Abstract
Decision makers often struggle with how to make a decision to test everyone or not for a disease. As we all know, health-care decision making must be based on plenty of scientific evidences instead of gambling. On the other hand, any decision might have to take a certain risk because uncertainty always exists in the real world. The key question is how to understand and measure the risk of decision making.
This chapter starts from several relevant concepts in epidemiology, biostatistics, and health econometrics because these concepts are the foundation to understand the entire chapter, such as sensitivity, specificity, incidence, mortality, and cost. Then, this chapter discusses all determinants for testing everyone in detail. Furthermore, a practicable question tool is developed in order to help us make a quick decision on testing everyone or not.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Screening for colorectal cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement (2008) Ann Intern Med 149:627–637
Medical dictionary (2014) Accessed 29 Aug 2014, at http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com
Rothman JK, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia
Last JM, Spasoff RA, Harris SS (2001) A dictionary of epidemiology, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, New York
Diagnostic odds ratio (2014) Accessed 2 Sept 2014, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diagnostic_odds_ratio
Drummond MF, Sculpher MJ, Torrance GW, O’Brien BJ, Stoddart GL (2005) Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York
Riss S, Weiser FA, Schwameis K et al (2012) The prevalence of hemorrhoids in adults. Int J Colorectal Dis 27:215–220
List of countries by HIV/AIDS adult prevalence rate (2014) Accessed 2 Sept 2014, at http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate
Screening for HIV (2013) Accessed 4 Sept 2014, at http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/uspshivi.htm
Rabies (2014) Accessed 4 Sept 2014, at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rabies
WHO/UNAIDS announce recommendations about male circumcision as HIV prevention. Strategy should be employed with care (2007) AIDS Alert 22:66–67
Lau JT, Zhang J, Yan H et al (2011) Acceptability of circumcision as a means of HIV prevention among men who have sex with men in China. AIDS Care 23:1472–1482
Chou R, Selph S, Dana T et al (2012) Screening for HIV: systematic review to update the 2005 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation. Ann Intern Med 157:706–718
Lucas A, Armbruster B (2013) The cost-effectiveness of expanded HIV screening in the United States. AIDS 27:795–801
Moyer VA (2013) Screening for HIV: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 159:51–60
Kim SK, Lee CH et al (2012) Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. J Korean Soc Coloproctol 28(1):35–41
WIKIPEDIA (2014) Sensitivity and specificity. Retrieved 2 Sep 2014, from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensitivity_and_specificity
Haslwanter T (2014) Statistical data analysis. Retrieved 2 Sept 2014, from http://work.thaslwanter.at/Stats/html/statsTests.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ren, J. (2016). Epidemiological Principles Applied to CER. In: Asche, C. (eds) Applying Comparative Effectiveness Data to Medical Decision Making. Adis, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23329-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23329-1_5
Publisher Name: Adis, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22064-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23329-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)