Skip to main content

How Do Academic Spin-off Companies Generate and Disseminate Useful Market Information Within Their Organizational Boundaries?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Organizational Innovation and Change

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 13))

  • 2017 Accesses

Abstract

From a market orientation perspective, this study intends to examine how small high-tech firms generate, disseminate and integrate information on customers’ needs, competitors’ activities and market forces within their organizational boundaries in order to define and to implement effective strategies. We perform an explorative qualitative analysis based on Italian and Spanish academic spin-off firms. We find that the activities of generation, dissemination and integration of market information are crucial to develop technological innovations and to obtain positive performance, even if these activities require the definition and development of a sophisticated marketing information system, as well as the availability of economic resources and specialized competences, often more limited in these small firms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Zhang, J.: The performance of university spin-offs: an exploratory analysis using venture capital data. J. Technol. Transfer 34, 255–285 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ortìn-Angel, P., Vendrell-Herreo, F.: University spin-offs vs. other NTBFs: total factor productivity differences at outset and evolution. Technovation 34(2), 101–112 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Mohr, J., Sengupta, S., Slater, S.: Marketing of high-technology products and innovations. 3rd ed. Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., Rajiv, S.: Success in high-technology markets: is marketing capability critical? Marketing Science 18(4), 547–568 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M.: The complementary effects of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation on profitability in small businesses. J. Small Bus. Manage. 47(4), 443–464 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kohli, A.K., Jaworski, B.J.: Market orientation: the construct, research proposition, and managerial implications. J. Mark. 54(2), 1–18 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lockett, A., Wright, M., Franklin, S.: Technology transfer and universities’ spinout strategies. Small Bus. Econ. 20, 185–200 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wright, M., Birley, S., Mosey, S.: Entrepreneurship and university technology transfer. J. Technol. Transfer 29(3–4), 235–246 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clarysse, B. Wright M., van de Velde, E.: Entrepreneurial origin, technological knowledge, and the growth of spin-off companies. J. Manage. Stud. 48(6), 1420–1442 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Steffensen, M., Rogers, E.M., Speakman, K.: Spin-offs from Research Centers at a Research University. J. Bus. Ventur. 15(1), 93–111 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Roberts, E.B., Malone, D.E.: Policies and structures for spinning off new companies from Research and Development Organizations. R&D Manage. 26(1), 17–48 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Franklin, S.J., Wright, M., Lockett, A.: Academic and surrogate entrepreneurs in university spin-out companies. J. Technol. Transfer 26(1–2), 127–141 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarysse, B., Moray, N.: A process study of entrepreneurial team formation: the case of a research based spin-off. J. Bus. Ventur. 19(1), 55–79 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Shea, R., Allen, T.J., Chevalier, A., Roche, F.: Entrepreneurial orientation, technology transfer and spinoff performance of U.S. Universities. Res. Policy 34(7), 994–1009 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Siegel, D.S., Waldman, D.A., Atwater, L.E., Link, A.N.: Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. J. Eng. Tech. Manage. 21(1/2), 115–142 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Lockett, A., Binks, M.: Venture capital and university spin-outs. Res. Policy 35, 481–501 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M.G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Moray, N.: Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi-dimensional taxonomy. Res. Policy 35(2), 289–308 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ensley, M.D., Hmieleski, K.M.: A comparative study of new venture top management team composition, dynamics and performance between university-based and independent start-ups. Res. Policy 34, 1091–1105 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shapiro, B.P.: What the hell is market oriented? Harvard Bus. Rev. 66, 119–125 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Narver, J.C., Slater, S.F.: The effect of a market orientation on business profitability. J. Mark. 54(4), 20–35 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Day, G.S.: The Capabilities of market-driven organization. J. Mark. 58(4), 37–52 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumar, V., E. Jones, Venkatesan, R., Leone, R. P.: Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? J. Mark. 75(1), 16–30 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jaworski, B.J., Kohli, A.K: Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. J. Mark. 57(3), 53–70 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kirca, A.H., Jayachandran, S., Bearden, W.O.: Market orientation: a meta-analytic review and assessment of its antecedent and impact on performance. J. Mark. 69, 24–41 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ellis, P.: Market orientation and performance: a meta-analysis and cross-national comparisons. J. Manage. Stud. 43, 1089–1107 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yin, R.K.: Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Miles, M.B., Huberman, A.M.: Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Denzin, N.K.: The research act: a theoretical introduction to sociological methods. McGraw-Hill, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U.: Organizational culture, market orientation, innovativeness, and firm performance: an international research odyssey. Int. J. Res. Mark. 21(1), 3–22 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lee, T.: Using qualitative methods in organizational research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tindara Abbate .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abbate, T., Cesaroni, F. (2016). How Do Academic Spin-off Companies Generate and Disseminate Useful Market Information Within Their Organizational Boundaries?. In: Rossignoli, C., Gatti, M., Agrifoglio, R. (eds) Organizational Innovation and Change. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22921-8_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics