Abstract
Although the United States Geological Survey (USGS) samples geochemical properties across the country, a complete understanding of the distribution of uranium remains elusive. Such an understanding would be useful to many government agencies because uranium can be both harmful to the environment and used to produce nuclear energy. I compare the performance of several nonparametric models for describing the geographic distribution of uranium deposits across the continental United States including the K nearest neighbors method, local regression models, generalized additive models, and Gaussian process models (kriging). I optimize model parameters using cross-validation with a training set and choose the final, most accurate model by comparison of predictions with a test set. I recommend using a kriging model, implemented with lattice krig, and utilizing an optional logarithmic transformation for uranium interpolation. Evidence for successfully avoiding overfitting through this cross-validation process is seen in the applicability of the optimal parameters for the prediction of substances other than uranium.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bohling G (2005) Kriging. http://people.ku.edu/~gbohling/cpe940/Kriging.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2015
Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York
Drew M (1977) US uranium deposits: a geostatistical model. Resour Policy J 3(1):60–70
Garza O, Cabrera M, Sanin L, Cortes M, Meyer, E (2014) Spatial analysis techniques applied to uranium prospecting in Chihuahua State, Mexico. In: AIP conference proceedings, Chiapas, Mexico, April 2014, vol 1607. AIP Publishing LLC, Chiapas, Mexico, pp 116–122
Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York
Ikramov K (2007) Inversion of a matrix. http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Inversion_of_a_matrix. Accessed 30 Jan 2015
Kane V, Begovich C, Butz T, Myers D (1982) Interpretation of regional geochemistry using optimal interpolation parameters. Comput Geosci J 8(2):117–135
Kazianka H, Pilz J (2010) Geostatistical modeling using non-Gaussian copulas. In: Accuracy symposium, Leicester, UK, July 2010, vol N, pp 49–52
Loader C (1999) Local regression and likelihood. Statistics and computing. Springer, New York
Nychka D (2014) R Package lattice krig. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LatticeKrig/LatticeKrig.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2015
Tang S, Xue Y, Meng J (1986) Application of the geostatistical analyses to uranium geology. In: Geological data integration techniques: proceedings of technical committee meeting of International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Oct 1986, pp 219–238
United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2004) The national geochemical survey—database and documentation. http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geochem/doc/home.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2015
Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Texts in statistical sciences. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York
Wu C, Wu J, Luo Y, Zhang H, Teng Y, DeGloria S (2011) Spatial interpolation of severely skewed data with several peak values by the approach integrating kriging and triangular irregular network interpolation. Environ Earth Sci J 63(5):1093–1103
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Ben Baumer, Nick Horton, and Antonio Possolo for advice and guidance on this project. Thank you to NSF Travel Support for funding my participation in the 13th International Conference of GeoComputation (i.e., Geocomputation 2015). Thank you to the editors for providing constructive feedback on this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Stoudt, S. (2017). Geostatistical Models for the Spatial Distribution of Uranium in the Continental United States. In: Griffith, D., Chun, Y., Dean, D. (eds) Advances in Geocomputation. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22786-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22786-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22785-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22786-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)