Skip to main content

Geostatistical Models for the Spatial Distribution of Uranium in the Continental United States

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Geocomputation

Part of the book series: Advances in Geographic Information Science ((AGIS))

  • 1232 Accesses

Abstract

Although the United States Geological Survey (USGS) samples geochemical properties across the country, a complete understanding of the distribution of uranium remains elusive. Such an understanding would be useful to many government agencies because uranium can be both harmful to the environment and used to produce nuclear energy. I compare the performance of several nonparametric models for describing the geographic distribution of uranium deposits across the continental United States including the K nearest neighbors method, local regression models, generalized additive models, and Gaussian process models (kriging). I optimize model parameters using cross-validation with a training set and choose the final, most accurate model by comparison of predictions with a test set. I recommend using a kriging model, implemented with lattice krig, and utilizing an optional logarithmic transformation for uranium interpolation. Evidence for successfully avoiding overfitting through this cross-validation process is seen in the applicability of the optimal parameters for the prediction of substances other than uranium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bohling G (2005) Kriging. http://people.ku.edu/~gbohling/cpe940/Kriging.pdf. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  • Cressie N (1993) Statistics for spatial data. Wiley series in probability and mathematical statistics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Drew M (1977) US uranium deposits: a geostatistical model. Resour Policy J 3(1):60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza O, Cabrera M, Sanin L, Cortes M, Meyer, E (2014) Spatial analysis techniques applied to uranium prospecting in Chihuahua State, Mexico. In: AIP conference proceedings, Chiapas, Mexico, April 2014, vol 1607. AIP Publishing LLC, Chiapas, Mexico, pp 116–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J (2009) The elements of statistical learning. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ikramov K (2007) Inversion of a matrix. http://www.encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php/Inversion_of_a_matrix. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  • Kane V, Begovich C, Butz T, Myers D (1982) Interpretation of regional geochemistry using optimal interpolation parameters. Comput Geosci J 8(2):117–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazianka H, Pilz J (2010) Geostatistical modeling using non-Gaussian copulas. In: Accuracy symposium, Leicester, UK, July 2010, vol N, pp 49–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Loader C (1999) Local regression and likelihood. Statistics and computing. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nychka D (2014) R Package lattice krig. http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/LatticeKrig/LatticeKrig.pdf. Accessed 20 April 2015

  • Tang S, Xue Y, Meng J (1986) Application of the geostatistical analyses to uranium geology. In: Geological data integration techniques: proceedings of technical committee meeting of International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Oct 1986, pp 219–238

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Geological Survey (USGS) (2004) The national geochemical survey—database and documentation. http://mrdata.usgs.gov/geochem/doc/home.htm. Accessed 30 Jan 2015

  • Wood S (2006) Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Texts in statistical sciences. Chapman and Hall/CRC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu C, Wu J, Luo Y, Zhang H, Teng Y, DeGloria S (2011) Spatial interpolation of severely skewed data with several peak values by the approach integrating kriging and triangular irregular network interpolation. Environ Earth Sci J 63(5):1093–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thank you to Ben Baumer, Nick Horton, and Antonio Possolo for advice and guidance on this project. Thank you to NSF Travel Support for funding my participation in the 13th International Conference of GeoComputation (i.e., Geocomputation 2015). Thank you to the editors for providing constructive feedback on this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Stoudt .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Stoudt, S. (2017). Geostatistical Models for the Spatial Distribution of Uranium in the Continental United States. In: Griffith, D., Chun, Y., Dean, D. (eds) Advances in Geocomputation. Advances in Geographic Information Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22786-3_29

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics