Skip to main content

Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Hysterectomy
  • 719 Accesses

Abstract

Types of robotic radical hysterectomy, indications for robotic radical hysterectomy and a step-by-step description with illustrations of the surgical procedure are provided. Comparison of surgical and oncologic outcomes between patients undergoing laparoscopic, robotic, and abdominal radical hysterectomy are reviewed. Lastly, postoperative management for robotic radical hysterectomy is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Piver MS, Rutledge F, Smith JP. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1974;44:265–72.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sert BM, Abeler VM. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (Piver type III) with pelvic node dissection–case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2006;27:531–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A case-control study of robot-assisted type III radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymph node dissection compared with open radical hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:357 e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cantrell LA, Mendivil A, Gehrig PA, Boggess JF. Survival outcomes for women undergoing type III robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a 3-year experience. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;117:260–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hoogendam JP, Verheijen RH, Wegner I, Zweemer RP. Oncological outcome and long-term complications in robot-assisted radical surgery for early stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort study. BJOG. 2014;121:1538–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Li G, Yan X, Shang H, Wang G, Chen L, Han Y. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;105:176–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wysham WZ, Kim KH, Roberts JM, et al. Obesity and perioperative pulmonary complications in robotic gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(1):33.e1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Estape R, Lambrou N, Diaz R, Estape E, Dunkin N, Rivera A. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:357–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ko EM, Muto MG, Berkowitz RS, Feltmate CM. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;111:425–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, Johnson PR, Tillmanns TD. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2009;113:191–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Neugut AI, et al. Comparative effectiveness of minimally invasive and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2012;127:11–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S, Jackson AL, Stavitzski NM, Dahl AA, Holloway RW. Robotic versus open yype III radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early stage cervical cancer. Soc Gyencol Oncol. Chicago, IL2015

    Google Scholar 

  13. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempster J, Laberge PY, The Society of O, Gynaecologists of C. Laparoscopic entry: a review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can(JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC). 2007;29:433–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Committee on Gynecologic Practice. Committee opinion no. 620: Salpingectomy for ovarian cancer prevention. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125:279–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emma L. Barber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barber, E.L., Boggess, J.F. (2018). Robotic-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy. In: Alkatout, I., Mettler, L. (eds) Hysterectomy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_67

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22497-8_67

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22496-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22497-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics