Abstract
In this chapter, I discuss core theoretical disputes, including: What is trust? Traditionally it is thought of in terms of interpersonal relations, but can it expand beyond that? Does it always reflect strategy, or what Hardin calls a three part relationship X trusts Y to do Z? Or is there another form of trust, what I call “moralistic” trust, where the logic is simply “X trusts”? What are differences among the various types of trust: strategic and moralistic, generalized and particularized, interpersonal and institutional? How do we measure trust? How is an individual’s trust shaped? Who, then, do they trust? Is trust something that can be molded over time, or does it remain relatively stable? And lastly, are institutional trust and generalized trust a part of the same syndrome; what determines institutional trust?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
In other words, though both forms of trust have decreased from the early 1960s to the early 2010s, the passage of this time period accounts for 77 % of the variance in generalized trust but only 42 % of the variance in trust in government.
- 2.
Thus, inequality accounts for 68 % of the variance in generalized trust during this time period.
References
Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review, 100, 2060–2092.
Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice (Abridged). Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.
Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bjørnskov, C., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2013). Is social capital a good concept? Social Indicators Research, 114, 1225–1242.
Bornstein, B. H., & Tomkins, A. J. (2015). Motivating cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust (Vol. 62nd Nebraska Symposium on Motivation). New York: Springer.
Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 888–1023.
Claibourne, M. P., & Martin, P. S. (2002). Trusting and joining? An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital. Political Psychology, 22, 267–291.
Clark, T., Putnam, R. D., & Fieldhouse, E. (2010). The age of Obama. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust (pp. 49–72). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. (1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 97–110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dinesen, P. T. (2012). Does generalized (dis)trust travel? Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination—Country environment on trust of immigrants. Political Psychology, 33, 495–511.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Trust and Institutional Power in Japan: The Construction of Generalised Particularistic Trust. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1, 53–72.
Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42, 347–360.
Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.
Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust (pp. 213–237). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.
Glanville, J. L., Andersson, M. A., & Paxton, P. (2013). Do social connections create trust? An examination using new longitudinal data. Social Forces, 92, 545–562.
Hardin, R. (1992). The street-level epistemology of trust. Analyse & Kritik, 14, 152–176.
Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.
Hardin, R. (2004). Distrust. New York: Russell Sage.
Ingraham, C. (2014). Three quarters of whites don’t have any non-white friends. Retrieved August 27, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/08/25/three-quarters-of-whites-don’t-have-any-non-white-friends/.
Lane, R. E. (1959). Political life. New York: Free Press.
Levi, M. (1996). Social and unsocial capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam’s making democracy work. Politics & Society, 24, 45–55.
Levi, M. (1997). A state of trust. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.
Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In M. Levi & V. Braithwaite (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 77–101). New York: Russell Sage.
Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.
Mansbridge, J. (1999). Altruistic trust. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 290–307). New York: Cambridge University Press.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Miller, A., & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 62–70.
Neville, L. (2012). Do economic equality and generalized trust inhibit academic dishonesty? Evidence from state-level search-engine queries. Psychological Science, 23, 339–345.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review, 21, 690–695.
Rosenblum, N. L. (1998). Membership and morals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rothstein, B. (2001). Trust, social dilemmas, and collective memories: On the rise and decline of the Swedish model. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12, 477–499.
Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58, 41–72.
Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Silver, A. (1989). Friendship and trust as moral ideals: An historical approach. European Journal of Sociology, 30, 274–297.
Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic ‘remedies’ for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367–392.
Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling together, bowling alone: The development of generalized trust in voluntary associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497–526.
Uslaner, E. M. (1998). Social capital, television, and the ‘mean world’: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441–467.
Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Where you stand depends upon where your grandparents sat: The inheritability of generalized trust. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 1–14.
Uslaner, E. M. (2012a). Segregation and mistrust. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Uslaner, E. M. (2012b). Measuring generalized trust: In defense of the ‘standard’ question. In F. Lyon, G. Möllering, & M. N. K. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust (pp. 72–82). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Uslaner, E. M. (2012c) Income inequality in the United States fuels pessimism and threatens social cohesion. Working Paper for the Center for American Progress (December 5, 2012), at http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/report/2012/12/05/46871/income-inequality-in-the-united-states-fuels-pessimism-and-threatens-social-cohesion.
Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 31, 868–894.
Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.
Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes towards democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 702–724.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Uslaner, E.M. (2016). Who Do You Trust?. In: Shockley, E., Neal, T., PytlikZillig, L., Bornstein, B. (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-22260-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-22261-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)