Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter, I discuss core theoretical disputes, including: What is trust? Traditionally it is thought of in terms of interpersonal relations, but can it expand beyond that? Does it always reflect strategy, or what Hardin calls a three part relationship X trusts Y to do Z? Or is there another form of trust, what I call “moralistic” trust, where the logic is simply “X trusts”? What are differences among the various types of trust: strategic and moralistic, generalized and particularized, interpersonal and institutional? How do we measure trust? How is an individual’s trust shaped? Who, then, do they trust? Is trust something that can be molded over time, or does it remain relatively stable? And lastly, are institutional trust and generalized trust a part of the same syndrome; what determines institutional trust?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In other words, though both forms of trust have decreased from the early 1960s to the early 2010s, the passage of this time period accounts for 77 % of the variance in generalized trust but only 42 % of the variance in trust in government.

  2. 2.

    Thus, inequality accounts for 68 % of the variance in generalized trust during this time period.

References

  • Algan, Y., & Cahuc, P. (2010). Inherited trust and growth. American Economic Review, 100, 2060–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport, G. W. (1958). The nature of prejudice (Abridged). Garden City: Doubleday Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almond, G. A., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov, C., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2013). Is social capital a good concept? Social Indicators Research, 114, 1225–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, B. H., & Tomkins, A. J. (2015). Motivating cooperation and compliance with authority: The role of institutional trust (Vol. 62nd Nebraska Symposium on Motivation). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J., & Rahn, W. (1997). Individual level evidence for the causes and consequences of social capital. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 888–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claibourne, M. P., & Martin, P. S. (2002). Trusting and joining? An empirical test of the reciprocal nature of social capital. Political Psychology, 22, 267–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, T., Putnam, R. D., & Fieldhouse, E. (2010). The age of Obama. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (1988). Trust as a commodity. In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust (pp. 49–72). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R. M., van de Kragt, A. J. C., & Orbell, J. (1990). Cooperation for the benefit of us—Not me, or my conscience. In J. J. Mansbridge (Ed.), Beyond self-interest (pp. 97–110). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinesen, P. T. (2012). Does generalized (dis)trust travel? Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination—Country environment on trust of immigrants. Political Psychology, 33, 495–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. N. (2000). Trust and Institutional Power in Japan: The Construction of Generalised Particularistic Trust. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 1, 53–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother, M., & Martin, I. W. (2013). Does inequality erode social trust? Results from multilevel models of US states and counties. Social Science Research, 42, 347–360.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambetta, D. (1988). Can we trust trust? In D. Gambetta (Ed.), Trust (pp. 213–237). Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glanville, J. L., Andersson, M. A., & Paxton, P. (2013). Do social connections create trust? An examination using new longitudinal data. Social Forces, 92, 545–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1992). The street-level epistemology of trust. Analyse & Kritik, 14, 152–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (2004). Distrust. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingraham, C. (2014). Three quarters of whites don’t have any non-white friends. Retrieved August 27, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/08/25/three-quarters-of-whites-don’t-have-any-non-white-friends/.

  • Lane, R. E. (1959). Political life. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1996). Social and unsocial capital: A review essay of Robert Putnam’s making democracy work. Politics & Society, 24, 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1997). A state of trust. Unpublished manuscript, University of Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M. (1998). A state of trust. In M. Levi & V. Braithwaite (Eds.), Trust and governance (pp. 77–101). New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1979). Trust and power. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J. (1999). Altruistic trust. In M. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 290–307). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., & Mitamura, T. (2003). Are surveys on trust trustworthy? Social Psychology Quarterly, 66, 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neville, L. (2012). Do economic equality and generalized trust inhibit academic dishonesty? Evidence from state-level search-engine queries. Psychological Science, 23, 339–345.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. (1956). Misanthropy and political ideology. American Sociological Review, 21, 690–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenblum, N. L. (1998). Membership and morals. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B. (2001). Trust, social dilemmas, and collective memories: On the rise and decline of the Swedish model. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12, 477–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, B., & Uslaner, E. (2005). All for all: Equality, corruption, and social trust. World Politics, 58, 41–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, A. B. (1997). The problem of trust. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver, A. (1989). Friendship and trust as moral ideals: An historical approach. European Journal of Sociology, 30, 274–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Roth, N. L. (1993). Explaining the limited effectiveness of legalistic ‘remedies’ for trust/distrust. Organization Science, 4, 367–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolle, D. (1998). Bowling together, bowling alone: The development of generalized trust in voluntary associations. Political Psychology, 19, 497–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (1998). Social capital, television, and the ‘mean world’: Trust, optimism, and civic participation. Political Psychology, 19, 441–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2002). The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Where you stand depends upon where your grandparents sat: The inheritability of generalized trust. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2012a). Segregation and mistrust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2012b). Measuring generalized trust: In defense of the ‘standard’ question. In F. Lyon, G. Möllering, & M. N. K. Saunders (Eds.), Handbook of research methods on trust (pp. 72–82). Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, E. M. (2012c) Income inequality in the United States fuels pessimism and threatens social cohesion. Working Paper for the Center for American Progress (December 5, 2012), at http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/report/2012/12/05/46871/income-inequality-in-the-united-states-fuels-pessimism-and-threatens-social-cohesion.

  • Uslaner, E. M., & Brown, M. (2005). Inequality, trust, and civic engagement. American Politics Research, 31, 868–894.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wuthnow, R. (1998). Loose connections. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., & Yamagishi, M. (1994). Trust and commitment in the United States and Japan. Motivation and Emotion, 18, 129–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zmerli, S., & Newton, K. (2008). Social trust and attitudes towards democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 702–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric M. Uslaner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Uslaner, E.M. (2016). Who Do You Trust?. In: Shockley, E., Neal, T., PytlikZillig, L., Bornstein, B. (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Trust. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22261-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics