Skip to main content

Abstract

Urodynamic studies assess the functionality of the lower urinary tract (bladder and urethra) by measuring pressure and flow. The diagnostic accuracy of urodynamics can be increased by the addition of fluoroscopy, which allows radiologic assessment of the anatomy of the lower urinary tract in real time. Synergistic assessment of lower urinary tract anatomy and function with fluoroscopy and urodynamics, respectively, provides the most comprehensive evaluation of the lower urinary tract. When both urodynamics and fluoroscopy are combined, the study is referred to as a videourodynamic study (VUDS).

Videourodynamic evaluations can be used to diagnose even the most complex voiding disorders such as differentiating between functional and anatomic bladder outlet obstruction and determining type and severity of incontinence. Furthermore, a VUDS can provide useful anatomic information such as bony pelvis and spinal abnormalities, presence of fistulae, the presence and location of obstruction, urethral anatomy, presence and degree of prolapse, and severity of vesicoureteral reflux.

The primary aim of this chapter is to familiarize the clinician with the background and advantages and disadvantages of the addition of fluoroscopy to urodynamics as well as provide a framework for the practical aspects of utilizing fluoroscopy in the office setting. Furthermore, suggestions to optimize fluoroscopy for certain conditions and troubleshooting for specific scenarios are included.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, Herndon CD, Kobashi KC, Kraus SR, Lemack GE, Nitti VW, Rovner ES, Wein AJ, American Urological A, Society of Urodynamics FPM, Urogenital R. Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU guideline. J Urol. 2012;188(6 Suppl):2464–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rackley R, Gill B. Urodynamic studies for urinary incontinence medscape. 2013. http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1988665-overview. Accessed 14 Jul 2014.

  3. Bates CP, Whiteside CG, Turner-Warwick R. Synchronous cine-pressure-flow-cysto-urethrography with special reference to stress and urge incontinence. Br J Urol. 1970;42(6):714–23.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Enhoerning G, Miller ER, Hinman Jr F. Urethral closure studied with cineroentgenography and simultaneous bladder-urethra pressure recording. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1964;118:507–16.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pietz M, Gloor E. Fluoroscopy permit requirements. State of California Department of Public Health. 2009. http://www.cdph.ca.gov/pubsforms/forms/Documents/RHB-Fluoroscopy.PDF. Accessed 14 Jul 2014.

  6. Geise R, Eubig C, Franz S, Kelsey C, Lieto R, Shaikh N, Wexler M. Managing the use of fluoroscopy in medical institutions, vol. 58. Madison, WI: Medical Physics Publishing; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  7. US Food and Drug Administration. Fluoroscopy. 2014. http://www.fda.gov/radiation-emittingproducts/radiationemittingproductsandprocedures/medicalimaging/medicalx-rays/ucm115354.htm. Accessed 14 Jul 2014.

  8. Amis Jr ES, Butler PF, Applegate KE, Birnbaum SB, Brateman LF, Hevezi JM, Mettler FA, Morin RL, Pentecost MJ, Smith GG, Strauss KJ, Zeman RK. American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol. 2007;4(5):272–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Giarenis I, Phillips J, Mastoroudes H, Srikrishna S, Robinson D, Lewis C, Cardozo L. Radiation exposure during videourodynamics in women. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(9):1547–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Health Physics Society. Radiation exposure from medical diagnostic imaging procedures. http://hps.org/documents/meddiagimaging.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2014.

  11. Patel U. Abnormal bladder contour or size. In: Imaging and urodynamics of the lower urinary tract. London: Springer; 2010. p. 57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. English SF, Amundsen CL, McGuire EJ. Bladder neck competency at rest in women with incontinence. J Urol. 1999;161(2):578–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J. Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol. 1999;161(5):1535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. American College of Radiology. ACR manual on contrast media, version 9. http://www.acr.org/~/media/ACR/Documents/PDF/QualitySafety/Resources/Contrast%20Manual/2013_Contrast_Media.pdf. Accessed 26 Oct 2001.

  15. Wittbrodt ET, Spinler SA. Prevention of anaphylactoid reactions in high-risk patients receiving radiographic contrast media. Ann Pharmacother. 1994;28(2):236–41.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karyn S. Eilber M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Feng, T., Eilber, K.S. (2016). The Use of Fluoroscopy. In: Peterson, A., Fraser, M. (eds) Practical Urodynamics for the Clinician. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20834-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20834-3_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20833-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20834-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics