Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Pressure Flow Study

  • Chapter
Practical Urodynamics for the Clinician

Abstract

The urodynamic test that assesses the voiding phase of bladder function is the pressure-flow study. Under normal conditions, a coordinated detrusor contraction and non-obstructive outlet results in a predictable low pressure, high flow pattern. A high pressure-low flow state is seen in patients with an obstructive bladder outlet. Low pressures-low flow states are seen in conditions of poor or absent detrusor contractility. The primary utility of the pressure-flow study is using the results to differentiate patients with an obstructive vs. non-obstructive flow pattern. Nomograms have been developed which are used to classify patients based on pressure-flow patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gleason DM, Lattimer JK. The pressure-flow study: a method for measuring bladder neck resistance. J Urol. 1962;87:844–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schäfer W. Urethral resistance? Urodynamic concepts of physiological and pathological bladder outlet function during voiding. NeurourolUrodyn. 1985;4(3):161–201.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Conrad WA. Pressure–flow relationships in collapsible tubes. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1969;16(4):284–95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Griffiths DJ. Urethral elasticity and micturition hydrodynamics in females. Med Biol Eng. 1969;7(2):201–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Griffiths D, et al. Standardization of terminology of lower urinary tract function: pressure-flow studies of voiding, urethral resistance, and urethral obstruction. International Continence Society Subcommittee on Standardization of Terminology of Pressure-Flow Studies. NeurourolUrodyn. 1997;16(1):1–18.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Schäfer W. Principles and clinical application of advanced urodynamic analysis of voiding function. Urol Clin North Am. 1990;17(3):553–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Griffiths DJ. Hydrodynamics of male micturition. I. Theory of steady flow through elastic-walled tubes. Med Biol Eng. 1971;9(6):581–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Griffiths DJ. The mechanics of the urethra and of micturition. Br J Urol. 1973;45(5):497–507.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nitti VW. Pressure flow urodynamic studies: the gold standard for diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction. Rev Urol. 2005;7 Suppl 6:S14–21.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Blaivas J. Multichannel urodynamic studies. Urology. 1984;23(5):421–38.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Abrams PH, Griffiths DJ. The assessment of prostatic obstruction from urodynamic measurements and from residual urine. Br J Urol. 1979;51(2):129–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffiths D. Basics of pressure-flow studies. World J Urol. 1995;13(1):30–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lim CS, Abrams P. The Abrams-Griffiths nomogram. World J Urol. 1995;13(1):34–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cox L, Jaffe WI. Urodynamics in male LUTS: when are they necessary and how do we use them? Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(3):399–407.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sekido N. Bladder contractility and urethral resistance relation: what does a pressure flow study tell us? Int J Urol. 2012;19(3):216–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Javle P, et al. Grading of benign prostatic obstruction can predict the outcome of transurethral prostatectomy. J Urol. 1998;160(5):1713–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gotoh M, et al. Prognostic value of pressure-flow study in surgical treatment of benign prostatic obstruction. World J Urol. 1999;17(5):274–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rodrigues P, et al. Urodynamic pressure flow studies can predict the clinical outcome after transurethral prostatic resection. J Urol. 2001;165(2):499–502.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Onyishi SE, Twiss CO. Pressure flow studies in men and women. Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(3):453–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scarpero H. Urodynamics in the evaluation of female LUTS: when are they helpful and how do we use them? Urol Clin North Am. 2014;41(3):429–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carlson KV, Fiske J, Nitti VW. Value of routine evaluation of the voiding phase when performing urodynamic testing in women with lower urinary tract symptoms. J Urol. 2000;164(5):1614–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Monz B, et al. Patient characteristics associated with quality of life in European women seeking treatment for urinary incontinence: results from PURE. Eur Urol. 2007;51(4):1073–81. discussion 1081–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Irwin DE, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. Eur Urol. 2006;50(6):1306–14. discussion 1314–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Defreitas GA, et al. Refining diagnosis of anatomic female bladder outlet obstruction: comparison of pressure-flow study parameters in clinically obstructed women with those of normal controls. Urology. 2004;64(4):675–9. discussion 679–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nitti VW, Tu LM, Gitlin J. Diagnosing bladder outlet obstruction in women. J Urol. 1999;161(5):1535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Blaivas JG, Groutz A. Bladder outlet obstruction nomogram for women with lower urinary tract symptomatology. NeurourolUrodyn. 2000;19(5):553–64.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Groutz A, Blaivas JG. Bladder outlet obstruction in women: definition and characteristics. NeurourolUrodyn. 2000;19(3):213–20.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Osman NI, et al. Detrusor underactivity and the underactive bladder: a new clinical entity? A review of current terminology, definitions, epidemiology, aetiology, and diagnosis. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):389–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schäfer W. Analysis of bladder-outlet function with the linearized passive urethral resistance relation, linPURR, and a disease-specific approach for grading obstruction: from complex to simple. World J Urol. 1995;13(1):47–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Abrams P. Bladder outlet obstruction index, bladder contractility index and bladder voiding efficiency: three simple indices to define bladder voiding function. BJU Int. 1999;84(1):14–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Thomas AW, et al. The natural history of lower urinary tract dysfunction in men: the influence of detrusor underactivity on the outcome after transurethral resection of the prostate with a minimum 10-year urodynamic follow-up. BJU Int. 2004;93(6):745–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mitchell CR, et al. Efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostat in patients with non-neurogenic impaired bladder: results of a prospective trial. Urology. 2014;83(2):428–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Han DH, et al. The efficacy of transurethral resection of the prostate in the patients with weak bladder contractility index. Urology. 2008;71(4):657–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Blatt AH, et al. Transurethral prostate resection in patients with hypocontractile detrusor–what is the predictive value of ultrastructural detrusor changes? J Urol. 2012;188(6):2294–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Seki N, et al. Predictives regarding outcome after transurethral resection for prostatic adenoma associated with detrusor underactivity. URL. 2006;67(2):306–10.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tanaka Y, et al. Is the short-term outcome of transurethral resection of the prostate affected by preoperative degree of bladder outlet obstruction, status of detrusor contractility or detrusor overactivity? Int J Urol. 2006;13(11):1398–404.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of Colorado, 2631 East 17th Ave., M/S-C-319, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA

    Kirk M. Anderson M.D.

  2. Loma Linda Urology, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson St., Room A560, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA

    David A. Hadley M.D.

Authors
  1. Kirk M. Anderson M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David A. Hadley M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirk M. Anderson M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

    Andrew C. Peterson

  2. Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA

    Matthew O. Fraser

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, K.M., Hadley, D.A. (2016). The Pressure Flow Study. In: Peterson, A., Fraser, M. (eds) Practical Urodynamics for the Clinician. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20834-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20834-3_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20833-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20834-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation