Skip to main content

Evaluation of Disability in Patients with Chronic Pain

  • Chapter
Multidisciplinary Management of Chronic Pain
  • 1792 Accesses

Abstract

Any clinician who sees patients with pain will likely see patients with disabilities. Because claims of disability affect the workplace, through federal and private insurance programs and injury litigation, these patients and their cases can be complicated, time consuming, and frustrating. This chapter will provide you an overview of the issues involved in disability-related medicine so you can guide and support your patients. Even though disability medicine often involves monetary payments, case workers, and insurers, the same multidisciplinary pain treatment concepts apply as they do to other chronic pain conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bishop, A., Foster, N., Thomas, E., & Hay, E. (2007). How does the self-reported clinical management of patients with low back pain relate to the attitudes and beliefs of health care practitioners? Pain, 135, 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns, J., Sherman, M. L., Devine, J., Mahoney, N., & Pawl, R. (2005). Association between Workers’ compensation and outcome following multidisciplinary treatment for chronic pain. The Clinical Journal of Pain, 11, 94–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ButieRitchie, D. T. (2005). “Objectively speaking…” there is no such thing in the law! Disability Medicine, 5(1), 6–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. H., Handlin, D. S., Richlin, D. M., Brand, L., & Vannucci, C. (1985). Unraveling the effects of compensation, litigation, and employment on treatment response in chronic pain. Pain, 23(1), 49–59.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fauber, J. (2012, October 2). Many injured workers remain on opioids, study finds. Journal Sentinel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fordyce, W.(Ed.). (1995). Back pain in the work place: Management of disability in nonspecific 723 conditions. Report of the task force on pain in the work place. Seattle, WA: International 724 Association for the Study of Pain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genovese, E., & Galper, J. S. (2011). In R. Gatchel (Ed.), Guide to the evaluation of functional ability. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, H. I. (1979). A new concept of disability. Journal of Rehabilitation, 45, 41–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadler, N. (2008). Worried sick (1st ed., p. 118). Charlotte: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association for the Study of Pain. (1995). Back pain in the work place: Management of disability in nonspecific conditions. Report of the task force on pain in the work place, Seattle, WA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacks, P. (1994 June). Malingering & fraud in psychiatric Workers’ Compensation claims. California Workers' Compensation Enquirer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, S., Viaeyen, J., & Ostelo, R. (2002). The back pain beliefs of health care providers. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12(4), 223–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loeser, G. D. (1980). In J. P. Turner (Ed.), Perspectives on pain in Proceedings of the First World Congress on Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutic (pp. 315–326). London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meier, B. (2013, June 23). Profiting from pain. New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. (2014). Low back pain fact sheet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen, T., Randolph, D., Talmage, J., Succop, P., & Travis, R. (2010). Long-term outcomes of lumbar fusion among Workers’ Compensation subjects. Spine, 36(4), 320–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterweis, M. (1987). Pain and disability—Clinical, behavioral, and public policy perspective. Committee on pain, disability and chronic illness behavior. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranavaya, M. (2012). Primary care physician and prescription narcotics for the treatment of chronic non-malignant pain. Disability Medicine, 8(1), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, J., Stout, C., Mack, B., Whitney, N., & Loughran, L. (2013). Return-to-work outcomes in non-operative lumbar cases following an evidence-based post-surgical rehabilitation program. Disability Medicine, 9(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tait, R. (2013). Presenteeism and pain: Psychosocial and demographic correlates of employment and disability. Pain Medicine, 14(11), 1617–1618.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • University of North Carolina Press. (2009). Author Q and A. Stabbed in the back, confronting back pain in an overtreated society. Retrieved from http://www.uncpress.unc.edu/browse/page/601

  • Vasudevan, S., & Ajuwon, A. (2014). Disability assessment. In K. Burchiel (Ed.), Surgical management of pain. New York: Thieme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., Burton, A. K., Aylward, M. (2008, May/June). A biopsychosocial model of sickness and disability. The Guides Newsletter. American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddell, G., Main, C. J., et al. (1982). Normality and reliability in clinical assessment of backache. British Medical Journal, 284, 1519–1523.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, M. R. (1978). The concept of the disability process. Psychosomatics, 19, 94–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • Genovese, E., & Galper, J. S. (2009). Guide to the evaluation of functional ability. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melhorn, J. M., & Ackerman, W. E. (2009). Guides to the evaluation of disease and injury causation. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, J. L., & Nagi, S. Z. (1970). Factors in behavioral response to impairments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation., 51(9), 552–557.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Osterweis, M. (Ed). (1987). Pain and disability. clinical, behavioral, and public policy perspective. Committee on pain, disability and chronic illness behavior. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, R. D., Genovese, E., & Katz, R. T. (2008). Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment (6th ed.). Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rondinelli, R. D., & Katz, R. T. (2000). Impairment rating and disability evaluation. Philadelphia: WB Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, J. D. (2007). Failure to communicate: How terminology and phones confuse the work ability/disability evaluation process. Journal of Insurance Medicine, 39, 192–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, J. D., & Melhorn, J. M. (2005). The physician guide to return to work. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Talmage, J. D., Melhorn, J. M., & Hyman, M. H. (2011). AMA guides to the evaluation of work ability and return to work. Chicago: American Medical Association.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Vasudevan, S. (2015). Evaluation of Disability in Patients with Chronic Pain. In: Multidisciplinary Management of Chronic Pain. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20322-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics