Skip to main content

Content-Focused Research for Innovation in Teaching/Learning Electromagnetism: Approaches from GIREP Community

  • Chapter
Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning

Abstract

This paper summarises research presented in the symposium organised by the Groupe International de Recherche sur l’Enseignment de la Physique (GIREP) on content-focused research and research-based instruction. A specific topic area, electromagnetism, was chosen to provide focus and continuity. The interpretative ideas developed by physicists to account for electromagnetic phenomena and the mathematical formalism used to represent these ideas make the subject ideal for exploring issues in learning and teaching that include the impact of students’ prior real-world experiences, their understanding of the nature of the interpretative process and their ability to relate formalism to phenomena. Electromagnetism also offers the opportunity to explore the relationships between macroscopic and microscopic models, as well as the ‘field’ concept. Thus the research findings presented have implications that go beyond the nominal content of electricity and magnetism. The symposium addressed learning among primary, secondary and university students pursuing careers as engineers or scientists and pre-service teachers. The themes include the study of conceptual knots related to the content, the implications for teacher training and the persistence of difficulties at the university level. Instructional approaches motivated by research findings were discussed. Researchers from Belgium, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United States presented results from their own investigations. As shown in this paper, the perspectives vary with regard to research questions, methods, interpretative frameworks and the role of specific research findings in driving educational innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Backhaus, U. (1993). Energietransport durch elektrische Ströme und elektromagnetische Felder. Magdeburg: Westarp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice theory of professional education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. E., & Hammer, D. (2008). Conceptual change in physics. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 127–154). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Challapalli, S. R. C. P., Michelini, M., & Vercellati, S. (2014). Informal learning in CLOE Labs to build the basic conceptual knowledge of magnetic phenomena. In M. F. Taşar (Ed.), Proceedings of The WCPE 2012. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. ISBN 978-605-364-658-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantinou, C. (2010, July). Design based research, ESERA Summer School, Udine. From http://www.fisica.uniud.it/URDF/Esera2010/lecture1.pdf

  • diSessa, A. A. (2004). Meta-representation: Native competence and targets for instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 22(3), 293–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., & Erickson, G. (1983). Theories-in-action: Some theoretical and empirical issues in the study of students’ conceptual frameworks in science. Studies in Science Education, 10, 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flemish Ministry of Education. (2012). Onderwijsspiegel 2012 [Brochure] (2012, Dutch). Retrieved June 8, 2013, from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/overzichten/onderwijsspiegel.htm

  • Flemish Ministry of Education. (2013). Inspectorate’s school reports. Retrieved June 5, 2013, from http://www.ond.vlaanderen.be/doorlichtingsverslagen/

  • Gilbert, J. K., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (1998). Models in explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 20(1), 83–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisasola, J., Furio, C., & Ceberio, M. J. (2008). Science education based on developing guided research. In Science education in focus (pp. 173–201). New York: Nova.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisasola, J., Zubimendi, L., & Zuza, K. (2010). How much have students learned? Research-based teaching on electrical capacitance. Physics Review Special Topics Physics Education Research, 6, 020102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Meestringa, T. (2004). Handboek Taalgericht Vakonderwijs. Bussum: Coutinho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer, M., & Meestringa, T. (2009). Handboek taalgericht vakonderwijs (2nd ed.). Bussum: Coutinho.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartlapp, M. (2012). Energiestromdichten in elektrischen Bauelementen. Thesis. TU Dresden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazelton, R. L. C., Stetzer, M. R., Heron, P. R. L., & Shaffer, P. S. (2013). Investigating student ability to apply basic electrostatics concepts to conductors. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1513, 166–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heron, P. R. L. (2004). Empirical investigations of learning. Part I: Examining and Interpreting Student Thinking. In: E. F. Redish, & M. Vicentini (Eds.), Proceedings of the international school of physics “Enrico Fermi,” (Course CLVI, July 2003, pp. 341–363). Varenna: Italian Physical Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krey, O. (2012). Die Rolle der Mathematik in der Physik. Berlin: Logos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In: J. Gess-Newsome, & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, L. C. (1990). In: Gardner et al. (Eds.), Toward a scientific practice of science education (pp. 3–30). L. Erlbaum & Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelini, M., & Vercellati, S. (2012). Pupils explore magnetic and electromagnetic phenomena in CLOE labs. Latin American Journal of Physics Education, 6(I), 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelini M., & Vercellati S., (2013). Magnetic field flux in understanding electromagnetism. 12th international conference APLIMAT 2013, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogborn, J. (1997). Constructivist metaphors of science learning. Science and Education. 6, 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietrocola, M. (2008). Mathematics as structural language of physical thought. In: M. Vicentini, & E. Sassi (Eds.), Connecting research in physics education with teacher education (Vol. 2). International Commission of Physics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Psillos, D., Kariotoglou, P., Tselfes, V., Hatzikraniotis, E., & Kallery, M. (Eds.). (2010). Science education research in the knowledge-based society. Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1969). Freedom to learn. Columbus: Merrill Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scaife, T. M., & Heckler, A. F. (2010). Students’ understanding of the direction of the magnetic force on a charge particle. American Journal of Physics, 78(8), 869–876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhden, O., Karam, R., Pietrocola, M., & Pospiech, G. (2012). Modelling mathematical reasoning in physics education. Science and Education, 21(4), 485–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Aufschnaiter, C., & von Aufschnaiter, S. (2003). Theoretical framework and empirical evidence on students’ cognitive processes in three dimensions of content, complexity, and time. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(7), 616–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenaro Guisasola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Guisasola, J. et al. (2016). Content-Focused Research for Innovation in Teaching/Learning Electromagnetism: Approaches from GIREP Community. In: Papadouris, N., Hadjigeorgiou, A., Constantinou, C. (eds) Insights from Research in Science Teaching and Learning. Contributions from Science Education Research, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20074-3_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-20073-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-20074-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics