Summary
Formocresol pulpotomy was the standard of care when used for vital primary pulp therapy. Concern has been expressed as to the safety of formocresol use in paediatric dentistry. From the published data, available ferric sulphate, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) and indirect pulp treatment (IPT) appear to be promising alternatives to the single-visit formocresol pulpotomy for cariously exposed vital primary molar teeth. Ferric sulphate use is technique-sensitive and MTA has cost implications. The modified stepwise excavation technique is discussed as an alternative to IPT to prevent pulpal exposure in teeth with deep caries. Desensitising pulp therapies and pulpectomy procedures are also discussed as alternative options when trying to maintain a deciduous tooth.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fuks AB, Chosack A, Klein H, Eidelman E. Partial pulpotomy as a treatment alternative for exposed pulps in crown-fractured permanent incisors. Dent Traumatol. 1987;3:100–2.
Chailertvanitkul P, Papungkornkit J, Sooksantisakoonchai N, Pumas N, Pairojamornyoot W, Leela-apiradee N, & Abbott PV. Randomised control trial comparing calcium hydroxide and mineral trioxide aggregate for partial pulpotomies in cariously-exposed pulps of permanent molars. Int Endod J. 2014;47(9);835–42.
Bjørndal L, Reit C, Bruun G, Markvart M, Kjældgaard M, Näsman P, Thordrup M, Dige I, Nyvad B, Fransson H, Lager A, Ericson D, Petersson K, Olsson J, Santimano EM, Wennström A, Winkel P, Gluud C. Treatment of deep caries lesions in adults: randomized clinical trials comparing stepwise vs. direct complete excavation, and direct pulp capping vs. partial pulpotomy. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118:290–7.
Dummer PMH, Hicks R, Huws D. Clinical signs and symptoms in pulp disease. Int Endod J. 1980;13(1):27–35.
Patel B. Examination and diagnosis. In: Patel B. Endodontic Diagnosis, Pathology and Treatment planning. Mastering clinical practice. Switzerland: Springer; 2015.
Baume LJ, Holz J. Long term clinical assessment of direct pulp capping. Int Dent J. 1981;31:251–60.
Michaelson PL, Holland GR. Is pulpitis painful? Int Endod J. 2002;35:829–32.
Andreasen JO, Bakland LK, Flores MT, Andreasen FM, and Andersson L. Traumatic dental injuries: a manual. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell; 2013.
Klein H. Pulpal responses to electric pulp stimulator in the developing permanent anterior dentition. J Dent Child. 1978;45:199–202.
Fuss Z, Trowbridge H, Bender IB, Rickoff B. Assessment of reliability of electric and thermal pulp testing agents. J Endod. 1986;12:301–5.
Duggal MS, Nooh A, High A. Response of the primary pulp to inflammation: a review of the Leeds studies and structural challenges for the future. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2002;3:111–4.
Duggal MS, Gautam SK, Nichol R, Robertson AS. Paediatric dentistry in the new millennium: 1. Quality care for children. Dent Update. 2003;30:230–4.
Fanning E. Effect of extraction of deciduous molars on the formation and eruption of their successors. Angle Orthod. 1962;32:44.
Cvek M, Cleaton-Jones PE, Austin JC, Andreasen JO. Pulp reactions to exposure after experimental crown fractures or grinding in adult monkeys. J Endod. 1982;8:391–7.
Shabahang S. Treatment options: Apexogenesis and Apexification. J Endod. 2013;39(3):S26–9.
Coll JA. Indirect pulp capping and primary teeth: is the primary tooth pulpotomy out of date? J Endod. 2008;34:S34–9.
Bjorndal L. Indirect pulp therapy and stepwise excavation. J Endod. 2008;34:S29–33.
Goldberg M, Smith AJ. Cells and extracellular matrices of dentin and pulp: a biological basis for repair and tissue engineering. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15(1):13–27.
Whitworth JM, Myers PM, Smith J, Walls AWG, McCabe JF. Endodontic complications after plastic restorations in general practice. Int Endod J. 2005;38:409–16.
Leskell E, Ridell K, Cvek M, Majare I. Pulp exposure after stepwise vs direct complete excavation of deep carious lesions in young posterior teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1996;12:192–6.
Bjorndal L, Larsen T, Thylstrup A. A clinical and microbiological study of deep carious lesions during stepwise excavation using long term treatment intervals. Caries Res. 1997;31:411–7.
Ng YL, Mann V, Gulabivala K. A prospective study of the factors affecting outcomes of nonsurgical root canal treatment: part 1: periapical health. Int Endo J. 2010;44(7):583–609.
Cho SY, Seo DG, Lee SJ, Lee J, Lee SJ, Jung IY. Prognostic factors for clinical outcomes according to time after direct pulp capping. J Endod. 2013;39(3):327–31.
Al-Zayer MA, Straffon LH, Feigal RJ, Welch KB. Indirect pulp treatment of primary posterior teeth: a retrospective study. Paediatr Dent. 2003;25:29–36.
Guelmann M, Bookmyer KL, Villalta P, Garcia-Godoy F. Microleakage of restorative techniques for pulpotomised primary molars. J Dent Child. 2004;71:209–11.
Kindelan SA, Day P, Nichol R, Willmott N, Fayle SA. UK National Clinical Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: stainless steel preformed crowns for primary molars. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2008;18:20–8.
Simon S, Perard M, Zanini M, Smith AJ, Charpentier E, Djole SX, Lumley PJ. Should pulp chamber pulpotomy be seen as a permanent treatment? Some preliminary thoughts. Int Endod J. 2013;46:79–87.
Rodd HD, Waterhouse PJ, Fuks AB, Fayle SA, Moffat MA. Pulp therapy for primary molars. Int J Paed Dent. 2006;16(s1):15–23.
Milnes A. Is Formocresol Obsolete? A fresh look at the evidence concerning safety issues. J Endod. 2008;34:S40–6.
Erdem AP, Guven Y, Balli B, Ilhan B, Sepet E, Ulukapi I, Aktoren O. Success rates of mineral trioxide aggregate, ferric sulfate, and formocresol pulpotomies: a 24-month study. Pediatr Dent. 2011;33(2):165–70.
Parirokh M, Torabinejad M. Mineral trioxide aggregate: a comprehensive literature review—part I: chemical, physical, and antibacterial properties. J Endod. 2010;36(1):16–27.
Fernández CC, Martínez SS, Jimeno FG, Lorente Rodríguez AI, Mercadé M. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of the use of four dressing materials in pulpotomized primary molars: a randomized clinical trial with 2‐year follow‐up. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2013;23:400–7.
Garcia-Godoy F. A 42-month evaluation of glutaraldehyde pulpotomies in primary teeth. J Pedod. 1986;10:148–55.
Hansen HP, Ravn JJ, Ulrich D. Vital pulpotomy in primary molars. a clinical and histological investigation of the effect of zinc-oxide eugenol cement and Ledermix. Scand J Dent Res. 1971;79:13–23.
Llewelyn DR. UK National Guidelines in Paediatric Dentistry: the pulp treatment of the primary dentition. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2000;10:248–52.
Kubota K, Golden BE, Penugonda B. Root canal filling materials for primary teeth: a review of the literature. ASDC J Dent Child. 1992;58:225–7.
Mortazavi M, Mesbahi M. Comparison of zinc oxide and eugenol, and Vitapex for root canal treatment of necrotic primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2004;14:417–24.
Bergenholtz G, Axelsson S, Davidson T, Frisk F, Hakeberg M, Kvist T, Norland A, Petersson A, Portenier I, Sandberg H, Tranaeus S, Mejare I. Treatment of pulps in teeth affected by deep caries – a systematic review of the literature. Singapore Dent J. 2013;34(1):1–12.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Patel, B. (2016). Endodontics in the Deciduous/Mixed Dentition. In: Patel, B. (eds) Endodontic Treatment, Retreatment, and Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19476-9_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19476-9_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19475-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19476-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)