Abstract
Mastectomy for breast cancer has a huge psychological and social impact on patients. That is why breast reconstruction has become an integrated part of the treatment for breast cancer.
Techniques for breast reconstruction include autologous, prosthetic based or both. The authors have used a novel approach which combines free abdominal-based flaps (most commonly DIEP flaps) and thoracoabdominal advancement flap (TAF). There are several advantages of this technique. First, that breast envelope is created by similar in texture and color skin (TAF skin). Second, the created breast skin pocket can be reutilized in case of DIEP flap failure. Third, the skin paddle of the flap can be removed at the second stage, avoiding the eventual patch appearance. The inconvenience of the DIEP plus TAF technique is that occasionally the TAF is too tight to recreate adequate breast projection. Herein we present the technical details of this method of autologous breast reconstruction after mastectomy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tan S, Lim J, Yek J, Ong WC, Hing CH, Lim TC (2013) The deep inferior epigastric perforator and pedicled transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap in breast reconstruction: a comparative study. Arch Plast Surg 40(3):187–191
Spear SL, Davison SP (2003) Aesthetic subunits of the breast. Plast Reconstr Surg 112(2):440–447
Djohan R, Gage E, Bernard S (2008) Breast reconstruction options following mastectomy. Cleve Clin J Med 75(Suppl 1):S17–S23
Mojallal A, Shipkov C, Braye F, Saint-Cyr M, Rohrich R (2010) New abdominal flap design for breast reconstruction in association with the thoracoabdominal flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 125(2):475–478
Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Van Hedent E, Duyck P (2007) Advances in autogenous breast reconstruction: the role of preoperative perforator mapping. Ann Plast Surg 58(1):18–26
Nahabedian MY, Tsangaris T, Momen B (2005) Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference? Plast Reconstr Surg 115(2):436–444
Akyurek M, Conejero A, Dunn R (2008) Deep circumflex iliac artery perforator flap without iliac crest. Plast Reconstr Surg 122(6):1790–1795
Serletti JM (2006) Breast reconstruction with the TRAM flap: pedicled and free. J Surg Oncol 94(6):532–537
Restifo RJ (1999) The “aesthetic subunit” principle in late TRAM flap breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 42(3):235–239
Delay E, Jorquera F, Pasi P, Gratadour AC (1999) Autologous latissimus breast reconstruction in association with the abdominal advancement flap: a new refinement in breast reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg 42(1):67–75
Spear S, Mesbahi A, Beckenstein M (2005) Re-creating the inframammary fold: the internal approach. In: Spear SL, Robb GL, Willey SC (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 1st edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 566–580
Nava M, Quattrone P, Riggio E (1998) Focus on the breast fascial system: a new approach for inframammary fold reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 102(4):1034–1045
Nava M, Ottolenghi J, Riggio E (2005) Re-creating the inframammary fold with the superficial fascial system. In: Spear SL, Robb GL, Willey SC (eds) Surgery of the breast: principles and art, 1st edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 581–600
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shipkov, H., Boucher, F., Mojallal, A. (2016). New Abdominal Flap Design for Breast Reconstruction in Association with the Thoracoabdominal Flap. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Breast Reconstruction. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18726-6_61
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18725-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18726-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)