Abstract
This chapter identifies contributions of Francophone traditions and conceptions of learning through work and learning for work and the practices deployed to understand more fully these processes of learning. It identifies and elaborates from an Anglophone perspective four distinctive qualities of the contributions within this edited monograph. These are, firstly, that there is no single or unitary Francophone tradition or conception of learning through practice. This quality is highlighted through outlining something of the diversity of what constitutes Francophone perspectives and some accounting of the origin of these distinct conceptions. The case made is that although there are cultural and linguistic traditions across the Francophone world, there are also localised historical and cultural factors that promote difference and diversity within these accounts. Secondly, and regardless, there is an emphasis across the contributions on physically, socially and personally situated activity which stands as being distinct within Francophone accounts. This situatedness goes beyond an objective analysis of work-in-action in specific physical and social contexts (actions of workers), to include the situated nature of how individuals come to engage with what is being manifested in that context (e.g. how and on what bases they act). Thirdly, there is a pattern of contributions considering not only workers as active and critical meaning-makers, but the need to account for their bodily engagement with and consequences of their work. Further, that these focuses on the personal stand as being the point of analysis in some of the contributions that make this emphasis quite distinct. Fourthly, the means for understanding and organising support for learning through work seem distinct. The two sets of qualities referred to above suggest that Francophone traditions of professional didactics and ergonomics, and in particular, the emphasis on the situation and body, seem quite culturally distinct. They seem more analogous to laboratory and encounter sessions from the Anglophone world than what would be used in that world to organise work-based learning experiences. It is these four conceptions that are discussed in terms of what they contribute to the field of work and learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35–44.
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Four essays (M. Holquist, Ed.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
Baldwin, J. M. (1894). Personality-suggestion. Psychological Review, 1, 274–279.
Baumgartner, A., & Siefried, J. (2014). Error climate and the individual dealing with errors in the workplace. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses of professional learning: On the boundary between learning and work. Dordrecht: Springer.
Benner, P. (1982). From novice to expert. American Journal of Nursing, 82(3), 402–407.
Benner, P. (2004). Using the Dreyfus model of skill acquisition to describe and interpret skill acquisition and clinical judgment in nursing practice and education. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 24(3), 188–199.
Bennett, C. A. (1938). The ancestry of vocational education. In E. A. Lee (Ed.), Objectives and problems of vocational education (2nd ed., pp. 1–19). New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Billett, S. (1996). Situated learning: Bridging sociocultural and cognitive theorising. Learning and Instruction, 6(3), 263–280.
Billett, S. (2001a). Coparticipation at work: Affordance and engagement. In T. Fenwick (Ed.), Sociocultural perspectives on learning through work (Vol. 92). San Francisco: Jossey Bass/Wiley.
Billett, S. (2001b). Learning through work: Workplace affordances and individual engagement. Journal of Workplace Learning, 13(5), 209–214.
Billett, S. (2006). Relational interdependence between social and individual agency in work and working life. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 13(1), 53–69.
Billett, S. (2009a). Conceptualising learning experiences: Contributions and mediations of the social, personal and brute. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 16(1), 32–47.
Billett, S. (2009b). Personal epistemologies, work and learning. Educational Research Review, 4, 210–219.
Billett, S. (2014). Mediating learning at work: Personal mediations of social and brute facts. In C. Harteis, A. Rausch, & J. Seifried (Eds.), Discourses on professional learning: On the boundary between learning and working (pp. 75–93). Dordrecht: Springer.
Bourgeois, E., Allegra, J., & Mornata, C. (2015). Transmission and individuation in the workplace. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bril, B. (2015). A functional approach to action: The case of tool-use learning. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Brougère, G. (2015). Learning by participating: A theoretical configuration applied to French cooperative day care centres. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bunn, S. (1999). The nomad’s apprentice: Different kinds of apprenticeship among Kyrgyz nomads in central Asia. In P. Ainely & H. Rainbird (Eds.), Apprenticeship: Towards a new paradigm of learning (pp. 74–85). London: Kogan Page.
Cho, M. K., & Apple, M. (1998). Schooling, work and subjectivity. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 19(3), 269–291.
Clot, Y. (1999). La fonction psychologique du travail. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Dreyfus, S. E. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the age of the computer. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Durand, M., & Poizat, G. (2015). Work analysis and transformation of practices: An activity-centred approach of vocational education. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Filliettaz, L. (2010). Interaction and miscommunication in the Swiss vocational education context: Researching vocational learning from a linguistic perspective. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Professional Practice, 7(1), 27–50.
Filliettaz, L., de Saint-Georges, I., & Duc, B. (2010). Skiing, cheese fondue and Swiss watches: Analogical discourse in vocational training interactions. Vocations and Learning, 3(2).
Filliettaz, L., Durand, I., & Trébert, D. (2015). Learning through verbal interactions in the workplace: The role and place of guidance in vocational education and training. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity: Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Glaser, R. (1989). Expertise and learning: How do we think about instructional processes now that we have discovered knowledge structures? In D. Klahr & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert a. Simon (pp. 289–317). Hillsdale: Erlbaum & Associates.
Gonon, P. (2002). The dynamics of the vocational training innovation in Switzerland. Paper presented at the Towards a history of a vocational education and training (VET) in Europe in a comparative perspective, Florence.
Gowlland, G. (2012). Learning craft skills in china: Apprenticeship and social capital in an artisan community of practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 43(4), 358–371.
Ingold, T. (2000). The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London: Routledge.
Jordan, B. (1989). Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives. Social Science and Medicine, 28(9), 925–944.
Kloetzer, L., Clot, Y., & Quillerou-Grivot, E. (2015). Stimulating dialogue at work: The activity clinic approach to learning and development. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Lave, J., Murtaugh, M., & de la Roche, O. (1984). The dialectic of arithmetic in grocery shopping. In B. Rogoff & J. Lave (Eds.), Everyday cognition: Its development in social context (pp. 76–94). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J., & Packer, M. (2008). Towards a social ontology of learning. In K. Nielsen, S. Brinkmann, C. Elmholdt, L. Tanggaard, P. Musaeus, & G. Kraf (Eds.), A qualitative stance (pp. 17–46). Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Lorino, P. (2015). Learning as transforming collective activity through dialogical inquiries. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Marchand, T. H. J. (2008). Muscles, morals and mind: Craft apprenticeship and the formation of person. British Journal of Education Studies, 56(3), 245–271.
Matte, F., & Cooren, F. (2015). Learning as dialogue: An ‘on-the-go’ approach to dealing with organizational tensions. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mauss, M. (1936). Notion de technique du corps. Journal de Psychologie, 3–4, 365–386.
Mayen, P. (2015). Vocational didactics: Work, learning and conceptualization. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Ouellet, S., & Vézina, N. (2015). Activity analysis and workplace training: An ergonomic perspective. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Peirce, C. S. (1998). The essential Peirce (Vol. 2, The Peirce Edition Project, Ed.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Poizat, G. (2015). Learning through interaction with technical objects: From the individuality of the technical object to human individuation. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
Rémery, V., & Merle, V. (2014). French approaches to accreditation of prior learning: Practices and research. In T. Halttunen, M. Koivisto, & S. Billett (Eds.), Promoting, assessing, recognizing and certifying lifelong learning: International perspectives and practices (pp. 265–280). Dordrecht: Springer.
Rogoff, B. (1982). Integrating context and cognitive development. In M. E. Lamb & A. L. Brown (Eds.), Advances in developmental psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 125–170). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
Schutz, A. (1996). Collected papers vol. 4. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Scribner, S. (1985). Vygostky’s use of history. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119–145). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Singleton, J. (1989). The Japanese folkcraft pottery apprenticeship: Cultural patterns of an educational institution. In M. W. Coy (Ed.), Apprenticeship: From theory to method and back again (pp. 13–30). New York: SUNY.
Smith, R. (2005). Epistemological agency and the new employee. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45(1), 29–46.
Smith, R. (2012). Clarifying the subject centred approach to vocational learning theory: Negotiated participation. Studies in Continuing Education, 34(2), 159–174.
Troger, V. (2002). Vocational training in French schools: the fragile State-employer alliance. Paper presented at the Towards a history of vocational education and training (VET) in Europe in a comparative perspective, Florence.
Van Lehn, V. (1989). Towards a theory of impasse-driven learning. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning issues for intelligent tutoring systems (pp. 19–41). New York: Springer.
Veillard, L. (2015). University-corporate partnerships for designing workplace curriculum: Alternance training course in tertiary education. In L. Filliettaz & S. Billett (Eds.), Francophone perspectives of learning through work: Conceptions, traditions and practices. Dordrecht: Springer.
von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In C. Janvier (Ed.), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 3–17). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Webb, E. (1999). Making meaning: Language for learning. In P. Ainely & H. Rainbird (Eds.), Apprenticeship: Towards a new paradigm of learning (pp. 100–110). London: Kogan Page.
Wegener, C. (2014a). A situated approach to VET students’ reflection processes across boundaries. Journal of Education and Work, 27(4), 454–473.
Wegener, C. (2014b). Would you like a cup of coffee? using the researcher’s insider and outsider positions as a sensitizing concept. Ethnography and Education, 9(2), 153–166.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Billett, S., Smith, R., Wegener, C. (2015). Understanding Learning Through and for Work: Contributions from Francophone Perspectives. In: Filliettaz, L., Billett, S. (eds) Francophone Perspectives of Learning Through Work. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18669-6_17
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18668-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18669-6
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)