Skip to main content

How to Improve the Refractive Predictability of SMILE

  • Chapter
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE)

Abstract

Small-incision lenticule extraction (ReLEx® SMILE) has been developed as a corneal refractive flap-free procedure in which an intrastromal lenticule is cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted through a peripheral corneal tunnel incision [9]. It is anticipated that the procedure will reduce some of the potential side effects of LASIK, such as eye dryness, epithelial ingrowth at the flap edge, a long-term risk for traumatic flap dislocation [11] and corneal ectasia which may develop during the years after surgery (Toda 2008). In the published studies so far, the refractive predictability, safety and patient satisfaction of ReLEx smile are high and comparable to Fs-LASIK [1, 4].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hjortdal J, Vestergaard A, Ivarsen A et al (2012) Predictors for the outcome of small-incision lenticule extraction for Myopia. J Refract Surg 28(12):865–871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hjortdal J, Ivarsen A (2014) Corneal refractive surgery: is intracorneal the way to go and what are the needs for technology? Proc. SPIE 8930, Ophthalmic Technologies XXIV, 89300B (28 Feb 2014), doi:10.1117/12.2054449

  3. Ivarsen A, Hjortdal J (2012) Seven-year changes in corneal power and aberrations after PRK or LASIK. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 53(10):6011–6016

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ivarsen A, Asp S, Hjortdal J (2014) Safety and complications of more than 1500 small-incision lenticule extraction procedures. Ophthalmology 121(4):822–828

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Reinstein D, Archer T, Randleman J (2013) Mathematical model to compare the relative tensile strength of the cornea after PRK, LASIK, and small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 29(7):454–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M (2013) Accuracy and reproducibility of cap thickness in small incision lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 29(12):810–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reinstein DZ, Yap TE, Carp GI, Archer TJ, Gobbe M, London Vision Clinic optometric group (2014) Reproducibility of manifest refraction between surgeons and optometrists in a clinical refractive surgery practice. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(3):450–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Reinstein DZ, Archer TJ, Gobbe M (2014) Lenticule thickness readout for small incision lenticule extraction compared to Artemis three-dimensional very high-frequency digital ultrasound stromal measurements. J Refract Surg 30(5):304–309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sekundo W, Kunert K, Russmann C et al (2008) First efficacy and safety study of femtosecond lenticule extraction for the correction of myopia: six month results. J Cataract Refract Surg 34(9):1513–1520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Shah R, Edgar DF, Rabbetts R, Harle DE, Evans BJW (2009) Standardized patient methodology to assess refractive error reproducibility. Optom Vis Sci 86:517–528

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Shah R, Shah S, Sengupta S (2011) Results of small incision lenticule extraction: all-in-one femtosecond laser refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 37(1):127–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Vestergaard A, Grauslund J, Ivarsen A et al (2014) Central corneal sublayer pachymetry and biomechanical properties after refractive femtosecond lenticule extraction. J Refract Surg 30(2):102–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Vestergaard A, Grauslund J, Ivarsen A et al (2014) Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg 40(3):403–411

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhao J, Yao P, Li M, Chen Z, Shen Y, Zhao Z, Zhou Z, Zhou X (2013) The morphology of corneal cap and its relation to refractive outcomes in femtosecond laser small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) with anterior segment optical coherence tomography observation. PLoS One 8(8):e70208

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesper Hjortdal MD, PhD, DMSc .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hjortdal, J., Vestergaard, A., Ivarsen, A. (2015). How to Improve the Refractive Predictability of SMILE. In: Sekundo, W. (eds) Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18530-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18530-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18529-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18530-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics