Skip to main content

The Emergence and Development of Causal Representations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Philosophy and Cognitive Science II

Part of the book series: Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics ((SAPERE,volume 20))

  • 775 Accesses

Abstract

In this article I intend to analyze how infants’ initial causal representations emerge and how their primitive causal knowledge evolves during cognitive development. Recent studies from developmental psychology report that infants acquire knowledge of physical causality earlier than what Piaget has described—by 6 months of age infants have already shown signs of sensibility to causality in simply physical events such as mechanical collision. Studies also suggest that infants recognize causality at such an early age by activating a primitive schema that uses merely spatial and temporal cues to identify causal relations. As infants grow, they learn to use complex information to identify causal relations, and they eventually acquire sophisticated schemas to represent causality. However, the development of causal knowledge is not a linear progression as Piaget has suggested. Infants’ primitive causal schema never disappears completely when infant grow and acquire mature understanding of causal relations. Infants’ primitive causal schema continues to exist in adulthood and plays a role in adults’ cognitive processing. When adults’ cognitive system is overloaded by processing information required by sophisticated causal schemas, it would protect itself by falling back to a lower level of information processing and returning to the primitive causal schema. When adults fall back to the primitive causal schema and overextend it beyond the realm of mechanical causation, misconceptions are bound to occur.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguiar, A., & Baillargeon, R. (1999). 2.5-month-old infants’ reasoning about when objects. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 116–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillargeon, R., Spelke, E., et al. (1985). Object permanence in 5-month-old infants. Cognition, 20, 191–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, S. (2009). The origin of concepts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Oakes, L. (1993). How infants perceive a simple causal event. Developmental Psychology, 29, 421–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Amsel, G. (1998). Precursors to infants’ perception of the causality of a simple event. Infant Behavior and Development, 21, 713–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., & Cashon, C. (2001). Infant object segregation implies information integration. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 78, 75–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Chaput, H., et al. (2002). A constructivist model of infant cognition. Cognitive Development, 17, 1323–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chi, M., Roscoe, R., et al. (2012). Misconceived causal explanations for emergent processes. Cognitive Science, 36, 1–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, S. (1999). Infants’ processing of causal and noncausal events at 3.5 months of age. The Journal of Genetic Psychology, 160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hespos, S., & Baillargeon, R. (2001). Reasoning about containment events in very young infants. Cognition, 78, 207–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotovsky, L., & Baillargeon, R. (2000). Reasoning about collisions involving inert objects in 7.5-month-old infants. Developmental Science, 3, 344–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A. (1984). Spatiotemporal continuity and the perception of causality in infants. Perception, 13, 287–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A., & Keeble, S. (1987). Do six-month-old infants perceive causality? Cognition, 25, 265–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leslie, A., Xu, F., et al. (1998). Indexing and the object concept: Developing “what” and “where” systems. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 10–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, L., & Cohen, L. (1990). Infant perception of a causal event. Cognitive Development, 5, 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D., & Gilden, D. (1989). Understanding natural dynamics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 384–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Proffitt, D., Kaiser, M., et al. (1990). Understanding wheel dynamics. Cognitive Psychology, 22, 342–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rips, L. J. (2011). Causation from perception. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 77–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakison, D., & Krogh, L. (2012). Does causal action facilitate causal perception in infants younger than 6 months of age? Developmental Science, 15, 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E., & Kinzler, K. (2007). Core knowledge. Developmental Science, 10, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E., & Kestenbaum, R. (1986). Les origines du concept d’objet. Psychologie Franaise, 31, 67–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E., Berinlinger, H., et al. (1992). Origins of knowledge. Psychological Review, 99, 603–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spelke, E., Phillips, A., et al. (1995). Infants’ knowledge of object motion and human action. In D. Sperber, D. Premack, & A. Premack (Eds.), Causal cognition: A multidisciplinary debate (pp. 44–78). Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Walle, G., Rubenstein, J., et al. (1998). Infant sensitivity to show motions. Cognitive Development, 13, 387–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F. (1999). Object individuation and object identity in infancy: The role of spatiotemporal information, object property information, and language. Acta Psychologica, 102, 113–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, F., & Carey, S. (1996). Infants’ metaphysics: The case of numerical identity. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 111–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Preparation of this article was supported by a grant (13JZD004) from the Philosophy and Social Sciences Foundation of the Ministry of Education of P.R. China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, X. (2015). The Emergence and Development of Causal Representations. In: Magnani, L., Li, P., Park, W. (eds) Philosophy and Cognitive Science II. Studies in Applied Philosophy, Epistemology and Rational Ethics, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18479-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics