Abstract
Previous studies have demonstrated that quantification of 18F-florbetapir uptake in the brain can be used to distinguish between populations of Alzheimers disease (AD) patients and healthy controls. Typically, quantification involves the calculation of standardised uptake value ratios (SUVRs), which requires registration to a template space in which regions of interest are defined. Consequently, SUVRs could be affected by the registration method used. We examine the effect of PET-based, MR-based and joint PET-MR registration on the SUVR. To achieve this, we introduce a joint-modality image-to-template registration framework that allows for variable contributions of PET and MR data to the registration process. We extend this further by proposing a method to determine the optimum combination of PET and MR information at each voxel. Following registrations of 100 subjects from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database, we show that there is a significant separation in mean SUVR between populations of AD patients and healthy controls for all registration methods. MR-only and PET-MR based methods slightly outperformed PET-only registration, however, diagnostic power was not affected by the registration method.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cachier, P., Bardinet, E., Dormont, D., Pennec, X., Ayache, N.: Iconic feature based nonrigid registration: the PASHA algorithm. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 89, 272–298 (2003)
Cattell, L., Schnabel, J., Declerck, J., Hutton, C.: Combined PET-MR brain registration to discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls. In: WBIR, pp.134–143 (2014)
Fleisher, A., Chen, K., Liu, X., Roontiva, A., Thiyyagura, P., Ayutyanont, N., Joshi, A., Clark, C., Mintun, M., Pontecorvo, M., Doraiswamy, P., Johnson, K., Skovronsky, D., Reiman, E.: Using positron emission tomography and florbetapir F18 to image cortical amyloid in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia due to Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 68(11), 1404–1411 (2011)
Guimond, A., Meunier, J., Thirion, J.-P.: Average brain models: A convergence study. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 77(2), 192–210 (2000)
Hutton, C., Declerck, J., Mintun, M., Pontecorvo, M., Devous, M., Joshi, A.: Quantification of florbetapir F18 PET: comparison of two methods.In: Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (2013)
Lorenzi, M., Ayache, N., Frisoni, G., Pennec, X.: LCC-Demons: a robust and accurate symmetric diffeomorphic registration algorithm. NeuroImage 81, 470–483 (2013)
Saint-Aubert, L., Nemmi, P., Peran, P., Barbeau, E., Payoux, P., Chollet, F., Pariente, J.: Comparison between PET template-based method and MRI-Based method for cortical quantification of florbetapir (AV-45) uptake in vivo. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 41(5), 836–843 (2014)
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., Joliot, M.: Automated anatomical labelling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single subject brain. NeuroImage 15(1), 273–289 (2002)
Vercauteren, T., Pennec, X., Perchant, A., Ayache, N.: Symmetric log-domain diffeomorphic registration: a demons-based approach. Med. Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv, 754–761 (2008)
Zijdenbos, A., Dawant, B., Margolin, R., Palmer, A.: Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13(4), 716–724 (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cattell, L., Schnabel, J.A., Declerck, J., Hutton, C. (2015). Investigation of Single- Versus Joint-Modality PET-MR Registration for 18F-Florbetapir Quantification: Application to Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Gao, F., Shi, K., Li, S. (eds) Computational Methods for Molecular Imaging. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18431-9_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18431-9_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18430-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18431-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)