Skip to main content

Investigation of Single- Versus Joint-Modality PET-MR Registration for 18F-Florbetapir Quantification: Application to Alzheimer’s Disease

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Computational Methods for Molecular Imaging

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics ((LNCVB,volume 22))

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that quantification of 18F-florbetapir uptake in the brain can be used to distinguish between populations of Alzheimers disease (AD) patients and healthy controls. Typically, quantification involves the calculation of standardised uptake value ratios (SUVRs), which requires registration to a template space in which regions of interest are defined. Consequently, SUVRs could be affected by the registration method used. We examine the effect of PET-based, MR-based and joint PET-MR registration on the SUVR. To achieve this, we introduce a joint-modality image-to-template registration framework that allows for variable contributions of PET and MR data to the registration process. We extend this further by proposing a method to determine the optimum combination of PET and MR information at each voxel. Following registrations of 100 subjects from the Alzheimers Disease Neuroimaging Initiative database, we show that there is a significant separation in mean SUVR between populations of AD patients and healthy controls for all registration methods. MR-only and PET-MR based methods slightly outperformed PET-only registration, however, diagnostic power was not affected by the registration method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://adni.loni.ucla.edu/.

  2. 2.

    http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/software/spm8/.

  3. 3.

    http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/.

References

  1. Cachier, P., Bardinet, E., Dormont, D., Pennec, X., Ayache, N.: Iconic feature based nonrigid registration: the PASHA algorithm. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 89, 272–298 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cattell, L., Schnabel, J., Declerck, J., Hutton, C.: Combined PET-MR brain registration to discriminate between Alzheimer’s disease and healthy controls. In: WBIR, pp.134–143 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fleisher, A., Chen, K., Liu, X., Roontiva, A., Thiyyagura, P., Ayutyanont, N., Joshi, A., Clark, C., Mintun, M., Pontecorvo, M., Doraiswamy, P., Johnson, K., Skovronsky, D., Reiman, E.: Using positron emission tomography and florbetapir F18 to image cortical amyloid in patients with mild cognitive impairment or dementia due to Alzheimer disease. Arch. Neurol. 68(11), 1404–1411 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guimond, A., Meunier, J., Thirion, J.-P.: Average brain models: A convergence study. Comput. Vis. Image Underst. 77(2), 192–210 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hutton, C., Declerck, J., Mintun, M., Pontecorvo, M., Devous, M., Joshi, A.: Quantification of florbetapir F18 PET: comparison of two methods.In: Paper presented at the Annual Congress of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lorenzi, M., Ayache, N., Frisoni, G., Pennec, X.: LCC-Demons: a robust and accurate symmetric diffeomorphic registration algorithm. NeuroImage 81, 470–483 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Saint-Aubert, L., Nemmi, P., Peran, P., Barbeau, E., Payoux, P., Chollet, F., Pariente, J.: Comparison between PET template-based method and MRI-Based method for cortical quantification of florbetapir (AV-45) uptake in vivo. Eur. J. Nucl. Med. Mol. Imaging 41(5), 836–843 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., Joliot, M.: Automated anatomical labelling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single subject brain. NeuroImage 15(1), 273–289 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vercauteren, T., Pennec, X., Perchant, A., Ayache, N.: Symmetric log-domain diffeomorphic registration: a demons-based approach. Med. Image Comput Comput-Assist Interv, 754–761 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zijdenbos, A., Dawant, B., Margolin, R., Palmer, A.: Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 13(4), 716–724 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liam Cattell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cattell, L., Schnabel, J.A., Declerck, J., Hutton, C. (2015). Investigation of Single- Versus Joint-Modality PET-MR Registration for 18F-Florbetapir Quantification: Application to Alzheimer’s Disease. In: Gao, F., Shi, K., Li, S. (eds) Computational Methods for Molecular Imaging. Lecture Notes in Computational Vision and Biomechanics, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18431-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18431-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18430-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18431-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics