Abstract
Australia has defined its water entitlement and allocation arrangements in a manner that has made it possible to establish one of the world’s most sophisticated water marketing systems. Entitlements are defined in perpetuity as an entitlement to a proportion of any allocations assigned to a water resource pool. Entitlements and allocations are tradable and in the Southern Connected River Murray system a vibrant water market has emerged. The functioning of this market is reviewed in this chapter. Overall the assessment from an individual water use perspective is that the introduction of this EPI has succeeded. From a national perspective, most experts also describe it as a success. As a Nation however, Australia would have been better off if it had solved the water accounting and over-allocation problems before it introduced water trading. An important conclusion is that unbundling has made it easier to resolve issues step by step. It also makes it much easier for individuals to adjust and innovate. New business and new technology must be expected to emerge with each reform that is made. The chapter concludes by highlighting relevant policy lessons for the practical application of water markets.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bjornlund, H., & Rossini, P. (2007). An analysis of the returns from an investment in water entitlements in Australia. Pacific Rim Property Research Journal, 13(3), 344–360.
Brennan, D. (2007). Missing markets for storage and their implications for spatial water markets. Paper presented to AARES conference, Queenstown, 14 Feb 2007.
Bryan, B., & Marvanek, S. (2004). Quantifying and valuing land use change for integrated catchment management evaluation in the Murray-Darling basin 1996/97–2000/01. Stage 2 report to the Murray-Darling Basin Commission. CSIRO Land and Water.
Dixon, P. B., Rimmer, M. T., & Wittwer, G. (2011). Saving the southern Murray–Darling Basin: the economic effects of a buyback of irrigation water. The Economic Record, 87(276), 153–168.
Fargher, W., & Olsvak, C. (2011). Water markets: A national perspective. In: J. Langford, & J. Briscoe (Eds.) with assistance from Taylor, N. The Australian water project: Volume 1. Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.
Murray–Darling Basin Authority (MDBA). (2010). Guide to the proposed basin plan. Canberra: Murray–Darling Basin Authority.
National Water Commission. (2010). Australian water markets report: 2009–10. Canberra: National Water Commission.
Water Act. (2007). Commonwealth of Australia.
Young, M. D. (2008). The effects of water markets, water institutions and prices on the adoption of irrigation technology. In J. Albiac & A. Dinar (Eds.), The management of water quality and irrigation technologies (pp. 227–248). London: Earthscan.
Young, M. D. (2010). Environmental effectiveness and economic efficiency of water use in agriculture: The experience of and lessons from the Australian water policy reform programme. Consultant report prepared for the OECD, Paris.
Young, M. (2014a). Trading into trouble? Lessons from Australia’s mistakes in water policy reform sequencing. In W. Easter & Q. Huang (Eds.), Water markets for the 21st century: What we have learned? Boulder: Westview Press. Chapter 11.
Young, M. (2014b). Designing water abstraction regimes for an ever-changing and ever-varying future. Agricultural Water Management, 145, 32–38.
Young, M. D., & Esau, C. (Eds.). (2013). Investing in water for a green economy. Services, infrastructure, policies and management. New York: Earthscan from Routledge. 296p. ISBN 9780415501262.
Young, M. D., & McColl, J. C. (2002). Robust separation: A search for a generic framework tosimplify registration and trading of interests in natural resources. Adelaide: Policy and Economic Research Unit, CSIRO Land and Water.
Young, M. D., & McColl, J. C. (2003). Robust reform. The case for a new water entitlement system for Australia. Australian Economic Review, 36(2), 225–234.
Young, M. D., Young, D., Hamilton, A., & Bright, M. (2002). A preliminary assessment of the economic and social implications of environmental flow scenarios for the River Murray System. A report prepared for the Murray Darling Basin Commission, Policy and Economic Research Unit. Adelaide: CSIRO Land and Water.
Young, M. D., Shi, T., McIntyre, W. (2006). Informing reform: Scoping the affects, effects and effectiveness of high level water policy reforms on irrigation investment and practice in four irrigation areas. CRC for irrigation futures technical report no. 02/06.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Young, M.D. (2015). Unbundling Water Rights as a Means to Improve Water Markets in Australia’s Southern Connected Murray-Darling Basin. In: Lago, M., Mysiak, J., Gómez, C., Delacámara, G., Maziotis, A. (eds) Use of Economic Instruments in Water Policy. Global Issues in Water Policy, vol 14. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18287-2_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18287-2_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18286-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18287-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)