Abstract
Engineering codes and other authoritative engineering sources implicitly claim that engineering promotes human “well-being,” but the term is not defined. Philosophical attempts to define well-being can be divided into desire-fulfillment (or preference) theories, hedonistic (or mental state) theories, and objective list theories. Psychological accounts of well-being are either hedonic or eudemonic. Both the objective list theory and the eudemonic theory consist of a set of goods that comprise well-being, and the lists have some similarity. The Capability Approach (CA) can also be interpreted as positing a set of conditions necessary to achieve well-being. I propose a reorganization of Martha Nussbaum’s well-known list of capabilities and show their relation to engineering. The design criterion that CA suggests is that technology should enhance the capabilities of those who use it to achieve a life that they have reason to value. Some of the most noteworthy attempts to design for well-being have been directed toward the special needs of people in developing societies. The focus on designing for human well-being, which I call aspirational ethics, suggests that, in addition to following rules that prevent harming the public, engineers should develop certain virtues. In designing for developing societies, the most important virtues are empathy and compassion. For developed societies, the most important virtues are concern for the environment, sensitivity to the effects of technology, especially on society and human relationships, and creativity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACM. (1992). ACM code of ethics and professional conduct. Association for computing machinery. http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Adler, M. D. (2012). Well-being and fair distribution. New York: Oxford University Press.
Alison, D. (2006). The luminous dusk: Finding god in the deep still places. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
Amadei, B. (2004). Engineering for the developing world. The Bridge, 32(2), 24–31.
Amadei, B., & Wallace, W. A. (2009). Engineering for humanitarian development. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28(4), 6–15.
Angeles, L. (2011). A closer look at the Easterlin Paradox. Journal of Socio-Economics, 40(1), 67–73. doi:10.1016/j.socec.2010.06.017.
Aristotle. (1962). Nicomachean ethics, (trans: Martin Oswald). Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
ASCE. (2008). Ethics, guidelines for professional conduct for civil engineers. American Society of Civil Engineers. http://www.asce.org/uploadedFiles/Ethics_-_New/ethics_guidelines010308v2.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Board of Ethical Review. (1982). Case 82.5. Whistleblowing. http://www.Nspe.Org/resources/ethics/ethics-resources/board-of-ethical-review-cases.
Borgmann, A. (2003). Power failure: Christianity in the culture of technology. Grand Rapids: Brazos Press.
Brandt, RB. (1998 [1979]) A theory of the good and the right. Amherst: Prometheus Books.
Brey, P. (2012). Well-being in philosophy, psychology, and economics. In P. Barey, A. Briggle, & E. Spence (Eds.), The good life in a technological age (pp. 15–34). New York: Routledge.
Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Soc Ind Res, 74, 349–368.
Constable, G., & Somerville, B. (2003). A century of innovation. Washington, DC: Joseph Henry Press.
David, S. A., Boniwell, I., & Conley Ayres, A. (2013). The oxford handbook of happiness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Diener, E., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Beyond money: Toward an economy of well-being. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(1), 1–31.
Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In R. Davis & M. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth: Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic.
Easterlin, R. A. (1995). Will raising of all increase the happiness of all? Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 27(1), 35–47.
Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 100(19), 11176–11183.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110, 918–938.
IEEE. (2006). IEEE code of ethics. The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers. http://www.sfjohnson.com/acad/ethics/FourCodesOfEthics.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Ivanhoe, P. J. (2013). Happiness in early Chinese thought. In S. A. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayres (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 263–278). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kang, S. (2007). Disembodiment in online social interaction: Impact of online chat on social support and psychosocial well-being. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 10(3), 475–477.
Lucena, J., Schneider, J., & Laydens, J. A. (2010). Engineering and sustainable community development. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.
Mitcham, C., & Munoz, D. (2010). Humanitarian engineering. San Rafael: Morgan and Claypool.
Mulgan, G. (2013). Well-being and public policy. In S. David, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayres (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. 517–532). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
National Academy of Engineering. (2010). Engineering, social justice and sustainable community development. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Newton, J. (2007). Wellbeing and the natural environment: A brief overview o the evidence. London: Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs.
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.
NSPE. (2007). Code of ethics for engineers. National Society of Professional Engineers. http://www.nspe.org/resources/pdfs/Ethics/CodeofEthics/Code-2007-July.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Pangle, L. S. (2003). Aristotle and the philosophy of friendship. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Robyens, I. (2011). The capability approach. In Edward N. Zalta (Ed.) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/capability-approach/
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2001). On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudemonic well-being. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 141–166.
Ryff, C. D., & Keys, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 719–727.
Seligman, M. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality re-examined. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Knopf.
Sen, A. (2005). Human rights and capabilities. Journal of Human Development, 6(2), 151–166.
So, T., & Huppert, F. (2009). What percentage of people in Europe are flourishing and what characterizes them? www.isqols2009.istitutodeglinnocenti.it/Content_en/Huppert.pdf. Accessed 25 Oct 2013.
Thimphu, T. (2013). Foreword. In A. David Susan, I. Boniwell, & A. Conley Ayres (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of happiness (pp. xvii–xviii). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vallor, S. (2012). New social media and the virtues. In P. Brey, A. Briggle, & S. Edward (Eds.), The good life in a technological age (pp. 193–202). New York: Routledge.
Wulf, W. A. (2000). Great achievements and grand challenges, revised version of a lecture given on October 22 at the 2000 annual meeting of the National Academy of Engineering, p. 1. Used with permission.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harris, C.E. (2015). Engineering Responsibility for Human Well-Being. In: Murphy, C., Gardoni, P., Bashir, H., Harris, Jr., C., Masad, E. (eds) Engineering Ethics for a Globalized World. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 22. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18260-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18260-5_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18259-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18260-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)