Skip to main content

Role of Angiosomes in Guiding Target Intervention for Open Procedures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Limb Salvage of the Diabetic Foot

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is one of the most common disabling diseases of the elderly. Critical limb ischemia (CLI) represents the most severe progression of PAD, threatening leg amputation. Revascularization is critical for limb salvage, prolonging survival, and improving the quality of life of patients with PAD. The ‘best vessel’ approach has been the traditional strategy used by surgeons when deciding the target vessel for intervention. Recently, angiosome-targeted revascularization to maximize healing of ischemic tissue lesions of the foot has gained popularity. However, this “idealized” anatomic concept has many theoretical and practical flaws, which make it difficult to generalize in patients with CLI. Many factors, such as quality of target vessel, role of pedal arch, extensive tissue loss and angiosome variability, need to be taken into consideration and this necessitates a more individualized approach for each patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG. Inter-society consensus for the management of peripheral arterial disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007;45(Suppl S):S5–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Selvin E, Erlinger TP. Prevalence of and risk factors for peripheral arterial disease in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999–2000. Circulation. 2004;110(6):738–43. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000137913.26087.F0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Novo S, Coppola G, Milio G. Critical limb ischemia: definition and natural history. Curr Drug Targets Cardiovasc Haematol Disord. 2004;4(3):219–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sumpio BE. Foot ulcers. N Engl J Med. 2000;343(11):787–93. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200009143431107.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sumpio BE, Lee T, Blume PA. Vascular evaluation and arterial reconstruction of the diabetic foot. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2003;20(4):689–708. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891–8422(03)00088–0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lepantalo M, Biancari F, Tukiainen E. Never amputate without consultation of a vascular surgeon. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2000;16(Suppl 1):S27–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dietzek AM, Gupta SK, Kram HB, Wengerter KR, Veith FJ. Limb loss with patent infra-inguinal bypasses. Eur J Vasc Surg. 1990;4(4):413–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Carsten CG 3rd, Taylor SM, Langan EM 3rd, Crane MM. Factors associated with limb loss despite a patent infrainguinal bypass graft. Am Surg. 1998;64(1):33–7. discussion 37–38

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simons JP, Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Cronenwett JL, Messina LM, Schanzer A, Vascular Study Group of Northern New England Failure to achieve clinical improvement despite graft patency in patients undergoing infrainguinal lower extremity bypass for critical limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2010;51(6):1419–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.083.

  10. Sumpio BE, Forsythe RO, Ziegler KR, van Baal JG, Lepantalo MJ, Hinchliffe RJ. Clinical implications of the angiosome model in peripheral vascular disease. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58(3):814–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.056.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rashid H, Slim H, Zayed H, Huang DY, Wilkins CJ, Evans DR, et al. The impact of arterial pedal arch quality and angiosome revascularization on foot tissue loss healing and infrapopliteal bypass outcome. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(5):1219–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.129.

  12. Kabra A, Suresh KR, Vivekanand V, Vishnu M, Sumanth R, Nekkanti M. Outcomes of angiosome and non-angiosome targeted revascularization in critical lower limb ischemia. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(1):44–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Taylor GI, Palmer JH. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40(2):113–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Attinger CE, Evans KK, Mesbahi A. Angiosomes of the foot and angiosome-dependent healing. In: Sidawy AN, editor. Diabetic foot: lower extremity arterial disease and limb salvage. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2006. p. 341–50.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Taylor GI, Pan WR. Angiosomes of the leg: anatomic study and clinical implications. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102(3):599–616. discussion 617–598

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamada T, Gloviczki P, Bower TC, Naessens JM, Carmichael SW. Variations of the arterial anatomy of the foot. Am J Surg. 1993;166(2):130–5. discussion 135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Varela C, Acin F, de Haro J, Bleda S, Esparza L, March JR. The role of foot collateral vessels on ulcer healing and limb salvage after successful endovascular and surgical distal procedures according to an angiosome model. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;44(8):654–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538574410376601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Neville RF, Attinger CE, Bulan EJ, Ducic I, Thomassen M, Sidawy AN. Revascularization of a specific angiosome for limb salvage: does the target artery matter? Ann Vasc Surg. 2009;23(3):367–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2008.08.022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Iida O, Soga Y, Hirano K, Kawasaki D, Suzuki K, Miyashita Y, et al. Long-term results of direct and indirect endovascular revascularization based on the angiosome concept in patients with critical limb ischemia presenting with isolated below-the-knee lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55(2):363–70. e365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2011.08.014.

  20. Taylor GI, Palmer JH. Angiosome theory. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(4):327–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Clair D, Shah S, Weber J. Current state of diagnosis and management of critical limb ischemia. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14(2):160–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886–012–0251–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Benitez E, Sumpio BJ, Chin J, Sumpio BE. Contemporary assessment of foot perfusion in patients with critical limb ischemia. Semin Vasc Surg. 2014;27(1):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2014.12.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips BT, Munabi NC, Roeder RA, Ascherman JA, Guo L, Zenn MR. The role of intraoperative perfusion assessment: what is the current state and how can i use it in my practice? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2016;137(2):731–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000475765.83901.80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Coats P, Wadsworth R. Marriage of resistance and conduit arteries breeds critical limb ischemia. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;288(3):H1044–50. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00773.2004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Brown ML, Tang W, Patel A, Baumhauer JF. Partial foot amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers. Foot Ankle Int. 2012;33(9):707–16. https://doi.org/10.3113/FAI.2012.0707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. McKittrick LS, McKittrick JB, Risley TS. Transmetatarsal amputation for infection or gangrene in patients with diabetes mellitus. Ann Surg. 1949;130(4):826–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Snyder DC, Salameh JR, Clericuzio CP. Retrospective review of forefoot amputations at a Veterans Affairs hospital and evaluation of post-amputation follow-up. Am J Surg. 2006;192(5):e51–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeffcoate WJ, Harding KG. Diabetic foot ulcers. Lancet. 2003;361(9368):1545–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140–6736(03)13169–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Laing P. The development and complications of diabetic foot ulcers. Am J Surg. 1998;176(2A Suppl):11S–9S.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Graziani L, Silvestro A, Bertone V, Manara E, Andreini R, Sigala A, et al.Vascular involvement in diabetic subjects with ischemic foot ulcer: a new morphologic categorization of disease severity. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007;33(4):453–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.11.022.

  31. Soderstrom M, Alback A, Biancari F, Lappalainen K, Lepantalo M, Venermo M. Angiosome-targeted infrapopliteal endovascular revascularization for treatment of diabetic foot ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57(2):427–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2012.07.057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Escotto I. The Angiosome Concept is not Necessary to Achieve Limb Salvage with Ischemic Gangrenous Foot Lesions. Veith Symposium 42nd Anniversary New York City. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Attinger C, Cooper P, Blume P, Bulan E. The safest surgical incisions and amputations applying the angiosome principles and using the Doppler to assess the arterial-arterial connections of the foot and ankle. Foot Ankle Clin. 2001;6(4):745–99.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Alexandrescu VA, Hubermont G, Philips Y, Guillaumie B, Ngongang C, Vandenbossche P, et al. Selective primary angioplasty following an angiosome model of reperfusion in the treatment of Wagner 1–4 diabetic foot lesions: practice in a multidisciplinary diabetic limb service. J Endovasc Ther. 2008;15(5):580–93. https://doi.org/10.1583/08–2460.1.

  35. Lang W. Angiosomes of the Foot Have Tremendous Variability as Indicated by Laser-Assisted Indocyanine Green Imaging Using the SPY SYSTEM. Veith Symposium 42nd Anniversary New York City. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rother U, Kapust J, Lang W, Horch RE, Gefeller O, Meyer A. The angiosome concept evaluated on the basis of microperfusion in critical limb ischemia patients-an oxygen to see guided study. Microcirculation. 2015;22(8):737–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/micc.12249.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bauer E. Sumpio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Citoni, G., Taurino, M., Sumpio, B.E. (2019). Role of Angiosomes in Guiding Target Intervention for Open Procedures. In: Edmonds, M., Sumpio, B. (eds) Limb Salvage of the Diabetic Foot. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17918-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17918-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17917-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17918-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics