Skip to main content

A Test of Four Service Quality Measurement Scales: The Case of the Australian Advertising Industry

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1995 World Marketing Congress

Abstract

To establish enduring and profitable relationships with their client base, service firms generally aim to differentiate their offering on the basis of service quality, a rather elusive concept. As a result of an active stream of research in the area of service and relationship marketing, the issue of measuring Service Quality has been widely debated in the literature. Two main scales have been developed and critisised in the last few years, SERVQUAL and SERVPERF. Two weighted versions of these two scales have also been used. This study attempts to identify which one of these four alternatives would be best suited for the purpose of Australian Advertising agencies. The weighted SERVPERF was found to be the best overall predictor of service Quality. Limitations and suggestions for further research are presented in the conclusion of the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • AMR:Quantum. Advertising Agency Image Survey General Report, Sydney, September 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, L. and Parasuraman, A.(1993) "Prescriptions for a service Quality Revolution in America", Organizational Dynamics; pp5-15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitner, M.J. (1990), "Evaluating Service Encounters: The Effects of Physical Surroundings and Employee Responses", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54; pp. 69-82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.W. and T.A. Swartz (1989), "A Gap Analysis of Professional Service Quality", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 53, April; pp. 92-98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman, J.M. (1990), "Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality: An Assessment of the SERVQUAL Dimensions", Journal of Retailing, Vol. 66 No. 1, Spring; pp. 33-55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castleberry, S.B. and McIntyre F.S. (1993), "Consumers' Quality Evaluation Process", Journal of Applied Business Research, Vol. 8 No. 3; pp. 74-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher, M.J, Payne, A. and Ballantyne D. Relationship Marketing: bringing quality, customer service and marketing together. Butterworth-Heineman, Oxford, Boston. 1991. Chap 1, pp 4, 5 and 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G.A., Jr.(1979)" A Paradigm for Developing better Measures of Marketing Constructs", Journal of Marketing research, Vol. 16; pp.64-73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin J.J. and S.A. Taylor (1992), "Measuring Service Quality: A Reexamination and Extension", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 56, July; pp. 55-68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidow W.H., Marketing High Technology, The Free Press. 1986. p 172

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, C.(1994) "Pressure grows as new clients dry up", The Australian Financial Review, 26 April; p 45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gujarati, D.N., Basic econometrics, 2nd edit. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, H.H. Modern Factor Analysis, 3rd edition, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R.C., Hospitality Marketing: The Internal Approach, The Cornell H.R.A. Quaterly, Nov. 1989, p 44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R.L. (1980), "A Cognitive Model of the Antecedents and Consequences of Satisfaction Decisions", Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 27, November; pp. 460-469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and L.L. Berry (1985), "A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 49, Fall; pp. 41-50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and L.L. Berry(1988), "SERVQUAL: A Multiple-Item Scale for Measuring Consumer Perceptions of Service Quality", Journal of Retailing, Vol. 64 No. 1, pp. 12-40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V.A. and L.L. Berry(1994), "Reassessment of Expectations as a Comparison Standard in Measuring Service Quality: Implications for Further Research", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 58, January; pp. 111-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rathmell, J.M. (1966) " What is meant by Services?" Journal of Marketing, Vol.30:pp 32-36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoebridge, N. (1993), "The writing is on the billboard for ad agencies", Bus. Rev.Weekly, Nov. 19; pp. 48-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teas, R.K. (1993), "Expectations, Performance Evaluation, and Consumers' Perceptions of Quality", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 57, October; pp. 18-34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theil,H. (1978) Introduction to Econometrics, Prentice Hall Inc, Edgewood Cliffs, N.J.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Quester, P.G., Romaniuk, S., Wilkinson, J.W. (2015). A Test of Four Service Quality Measurement Scales: The Case of the Australian Advertising Industry. In: Grant, K., Walker, I. (eds) Proceedings of the 1995 World Marketing Congress. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17311-5_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics