Skip to main content

Valuation of Ecosystem Services

  • Chapter
Coastal Zones Ecosystem Services

Part of the book series: Studies in Ecological Economics ((SEEC,volume 9))

Abstract

Economic assessment provides one strand of an overall integrated (sustainability) analysis. The core aim of the economic assessment process is to determine how changes in ecosystem services provision are translated into changes in human welfare. The chapter discusses available valuation methods and key issues for appropriate economic valuation of ecosystem services. Since sustainable policies often require choosing between options that differ in temporal patterns of costs and benefits, or that differ in their duration, discounting can be used to compare costs and benefit that occur at different points in time. Different discount rates have different implications for trade-off analysis, including the consideration of intergeneration equity. However, it may not be possible to value all impacts through economic approaches, because of practical or ethical considerations. Contested issues which are commonplace in coastal management, also require the consideration of equity impacts, for which economics/social sciences provide different approaches to inform trade-offs and decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    GDP reflects the financial (market) value of all final goods and services produced within a country within a certain period. Net Domestic Product (net GDP) is GDP net of the depreciation on capital goods, and thereby reflects how much capital has been consumed over the year.

References

  • Asheim, G. B. (2012). Discounting while treating generations equality. In R. W. Hahn & A. Ulph (Eds.), Climate change and common sense: Essays in honour of Tom Schelling. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bainbridge, J. M., Potts, T., & O’Higgins, T. G. (2011). Rapid policy network mapping: A new method for understanding governance structures for implementation of marine environmental policy. PLoS ONE, 6, e20149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, I. J., Ferrini, S., Brouwer, R., Schaafsma, M., Barton, D. N., Dubgaard, A., Hasler, B., Hime, S., Liekens, I., Navrud, S., De Nocker, L., Sceponavicitue, R., & Semeniene, R. (2011). Making benefit transfers work: Deriving and testing principles for value transfers for similar and dissimilar sites using a case study of the non-market benefits of water quality improvements across Europe. Environmental and Resource Economics, 50, 368–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baveye, P. C., Baveye, J., & Gowdy, J. (2013). Monetary valuation of ecosystem services: It matters to get the timeline right. Ecological Economics, 95, 231–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodin, Ö., & Crona, B. (2009). The role of social networks in natural resource governance: What relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change, 19, 366–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgatti, S. P., Mehra, A., Brass, D. J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892–895.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, L. M., Florax, R. J. G. M., & Vermaat, J. E. (2006). The empirics of wetland valuation: A comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental and Resource Economics, 33, 223–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brander, L. M., Brauer, I., Gerdes, H., Ghermandi, A., Kuik, O., Markandya, A., Navrud, S., Nunes, P. A. L. D., Schaafsma, M., Vos, H., & Wagtendonk, A. (2012). Using meta-analysis and GIS for value transfer and scaling up: Valuing climate change induced losses of European wetlands. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52, 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R. (2000). Environmental value transfer: State of the art and future prospects. Ecological Economics, 32, 137–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, R. (2006). Do stated preference methods stand the test of time? A test of the stability of contingent values and models for health risks when facing an extreme event. Ecological Economics, 60(2), 399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., D’Arge, R., Groot, R. D., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neil, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Belt, M. V. D. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2011). The ethics of intertemporal distribution in a warming planet: Reply and response to J.E. Roemer. Environmental and Resource Economics, 50, 475–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fish, R., Burgess, J., Chilvers, J., Footitt, A., Haines‐Young, R., Russel, D., Turner, K., & Winter, D. M. (2011). Participatory and deliberative techniques for embedding an ecosystems approach into decision making. Full Technical Report, Project Code: NR0124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 351–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollier, C. (2002). Discounting an uncertain future. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowdy, J. M. (2004). The revolution in welfare economics and its implications for environmental valuation and policy. Land Economics, 80, 239–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groom, B., Hepburn, C., Koundouri, P., & Pearce, D. W. (2005). Declining discount rates: The long and short of it. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 445–493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (1998). Valuing the future: Economic theory and sustainability. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (2000). Nature and the marketplace. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, N., & Bateman, I. (1995). Empirical and public choice evidence for hyperbolic social discount rates and the implications for intergenerational discounting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 13–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMT. (2003). Green book: Appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, R. B., & Farber, S. (2002). Accounting for the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Economics, 41, 421–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knetsch, K. (2005). Gains, losses and the US-EPA economic analyses guidelines: A hazardous product? Environmental and Resource Economics, 32, 91–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luisetti, T., Turner, R. K., Bateman, I. J., Morse-Jones, S., Adams, C., & Fonseca, L. (2011). Coastal and marine ecosystem services valuation for policy and management: Managed realignment case studies in England. Ocean and Coastal Management, 54, 212–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luisetti, T., Jackson, E., & Turner, R. K. (2013). Valuing the European ‘Coastal Blue Carbon’ storage benefit. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 71(1–2), 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA). (2005). Millennium ecosystem assessment: Ecosystems and human wellbeing: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse-Jones, S., Bateman, I. J., Kontoleon, A., Ferrini, S., Burgess, N. D., & Turner, R. K. (2012). Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects. Ecological Economics, 78, 9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard, R. B. (2010). Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder. Ecological Economics, 69(6), 1219–1227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2007). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 15181–15187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. W., & Turner, R. K. (1990). Economics of natural resources and the environment. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potts, T., O’Higgins, T., Mee, L., & Pita, C. (2011). Public perceptions of Europe’s seas – A policy brief. Eu Fp7 Knowseas Project. ISBN 0-9529089-3-X.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J. E. (2011). The ethics of intertemporal distribution in a warming planet. Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 363–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, R. J. (2012). Oceanography: Future impact of today’s choices. Nature Climate Change, 2, 397–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. (1999). The place of economic values in environmental valuation. In I. J. Bateman & K. G. Willis (Eds.), Valuing environmental preferences (pp. 17–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K. (2007). Limits to CBA in UK and European environmental policy: Retrospects and future prospects. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 253–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Jessamy, V., & Georgiou, S. (2003). Valuing nature: Lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46, 493–510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, R. K., Morse-Jones, S., & Fisher, B. (2010). Ecosystem valuation: A sequential decision-support system and quality assessment issues. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1185, 79–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK National Ecosystem Assessment Follow-on. (2014). The UK national ecosystem assessment follow-on: Synthesis of the Key findings. Cambridge, UK: UNEP-WCMC/LWEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNU-IHDP and UNEP. (2012). Inclusive wealth report 2012. Measuring progress toward sustainability. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vatn, A. (2009). An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal. Ecological Economics, 68, 2207–2215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. (1998). Why far distant future should be discounted at its lowest possible rate. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26, 200–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, R., & Pilkey, O. (2010). How high will seas rise? Get ready for seven feet. Yale Environment 360. 14 Jan 2010.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. K. Turner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turner, R.K., Schaafsma, M. (2015). Valuation of Ecosystem Services. In: Turner, R., Schaafsma, M. (eds) Coastal Zones Ecosystem Services. Studies in Ecological Economics, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17214-9_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics