Skip to main content

Two Rules for the Same Fish: Small-Scale Fisheries Governance in Mainland Ecuador and Galapagos Islands

  • Chapter
Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries

Part of the book series: MARE Publication Series ((MARE,volume 13))

Abstract

The small-scale fisheries sector in the Ecuador mainland and Galapagos Islands face major challenges triggered by large scale human and climatic events, which compromise their sustainability. Lack of trust, leadership and cohesion among small-scale fisheries entities, limited organizational skills, and social problems within fishing communities reduce this sector’s governability. Further, lack of willingness of fishers to observe rules, limited governing capacity and lack of political attention to small-scale fisheries often contribute to making the overall system less governable. According to interactive governance theory, different governing modes would be suitable for different systems, depending also on the types and quality of governing interactions. Using the interactive governance framework, this chapter explores the performance of the hierarchical and co-governance mode for small-scale fisheries governance in the Ecuador mainland and Galapagos Islands, respectively. These two case studies, by using empirical evidence and triangulation-based methods, analyze the small-scale fisheries sector and some mechanisms through which the governing system, the system-to-be-governed, and governing interactions are operating. The chapter highlights that both hierarchical and co-governance modes of governance have underperformed and consequently that their governability has been reduced for three main reasons: the mismatch between legal frameworks, the undefined social system’s borders, and the use of inappropriate mechanisms for information mobilization. The chapter concludes by suggesting that both models need to contribute to national initiatives, to strength the social system, and to increase the small-scale fisheries sector governability. Only then can fisheries sustainability be achieved.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Caleta is any village or town closely related and highly dependent on fishing activities.

References

  • Agüero, M. (1992). La pesca artesanal en América Latina: Una visión panoramic. In Agüero (Ed.), Contribuciones para el estudio de la pesca artesanal en America Latina (pp. 1–27). ICLARM Cod. Proc. 35. International Center for Living Aquatic Resources Management: Manila

    Google Scholar 

  • Agüero, M. (Ed.). (2007). Capacidad de pesca y manejo pesquero en América Latina y el Caribe. FAO Documento Técnico de Pesca 461. Roma: Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsopp, W. H. L. (1985). Fishery development experiences. Farnham: Fishing New Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, N. L., Béné, C., Hall, S. J., Allison, E. H., Heck, S., & Ratner, B. D. (2007). Diagnosis and management of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Fish and Fisheries, 8, 27–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anón, H. (1983). Enciclopedia de las provincias del Ecuador (Galápagos). Quito: Científica Latina Editores, Cia. Ltda.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35(4), 216–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga, L., & Egas, E. (1998). Taller Pesca, Acuicultura y Desarrollo Sustentable. Plan Estratégico de Desarrollo y Seguridad Nacional, Ecuador. Secretaría General de Planificación-VECEP. Informe Técnico. Guayaquil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arriaga, L., & Martínez, J. (2008). Plan de Ordenamiento de la Pesca y Acuicultura del Ecuador. Informe de Consultoría. Subsecretaría de Recursos Pesqueros-Ministerio de Comercio Exterior, Industrialización, Pesca, y Competitividad. Convenio de Préstamo BIRF-No. 43-46 EC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baine, M., Howard, M., Kerr, S., Edgar, G., & Toral, V. (2007). Coastal and marine resource management in the Galapagos Islands and the Archipelago of San Andres: Issues, problems and opportunities. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50, 148–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Diallo, M., van der Heijden, P., Kooiman, J., Mahon, R., & Williams, S. (2005). Interactive fisheries governance. Delft: Eburon Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Jentoft, S., & Kooiman, J. (2013). Governability of fisheries and aquaculture. Theory and applications (MARE publications series 7). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beltrán-Turriago, C. S. (2001). Promoción de la ordenación de la pesca costera. 2. Aspectos socioeconómicos y técnicos de la pesca artesanal en El salvador, Costa Rica, Panamá, Ecuador y Colombia (FAO Circular de Pesca. No. 957/2). Roma: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné, C. (2006). Small-scale fisheries: Assessing their contribution to rural livelihoods in developing countries (Fisheries Circular No. 1008, 46 pp). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Béné, C., Macfadyen, G., & Allison, E. H. (2007). Increasing the contribution of small-scale fisheries to poverty alleviation and food security (FAO Fisheries Technical Paper. No. 481, 125 p). Rome: FAO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bensted-Smith, R., Powell, G., & Dinerstein, E. (2002). Chapter 1: Planificación para la Ecoregión. In Fundación Charles Darwin para las Islas Galapagos (FCD) y WWF (Eds.), Visión para la Biodiversidad de las Islas Galápagos. Taller Internacional de Biólogos de la Conservación (pp. 11–16). Puerto Ayora: Galapagos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes, F., Mahon, R., McConney, P., Pollnac, R., & Pomeroy, R. (2001). Managing small-scale fisheries: Alternative directions and methods. Ottawa: International Development Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bravo, M. (2003). Sistema de seguimiento de la Junta de manejo participativo documento de trabajo no. 8 (Proyecto No. 1274 / 0C-EC). Programa de Manejo Ambiental de las Islas Galápagos – PMAIG. Mayo, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Y., Brown, D., Davy, B., Haughton, M., & Ovares, L. (Eds.). (2006). Coastal management in the wider Caribbean: Resilience, adaptation and community diversity. (ebook) Ian Randle Publishers/IRDC. Retrieved August 6, 2008, from http://www.idrc.ca/openebooks/336-4/

  • Bustamante, R., Espinoza, E., Nicolaides, F., Murillo, J. C., Chasiluisa, C., Ruttemberg, B., Andrade, R., Torres, S., Toral, M. V., Barreno, J., & Piú, M. (1999). Fishing in Galapagos: A summary of the main indicators for 1998. In Fundación Natura & WWF (Eds.), Galapagos report 1998–1999 (pp. 35–49). Trama Publishers: Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camhi, M. (1995). Industrial fisheries threaten ecological integrity of the Galapagos Islands. Conservation Biology, 9(4), 715–724.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., Fallows, J., Scott, I., Ortiz, J., Rodríguez, T., & Mora, Y. (1991). Una revisión del sector pesquero artesanal en el Ecuador y los factores de consideración para el desarrollo. Boletín Científico y Técnico, Instituto Nacional de Pesca, 11(8), 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castrejón, M. (2011). Co-manejo Pesquero en la Reserva Marina de Galápagos: tendencias, retos y perspectivas de cambio. Mexico: Tinker Foundation/ECCD/Kanankil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castrejón, M., & Charles, A. (2013). Improving fisheries co-management through ecosystem-based spatial management: The Galapagos Marine Reserve. Marine Policy, 38, 235–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castrejón, M., Defeo, O., Reck, G., & Charles, A. (2014). Fishery science in Galapagos: From a resource-focused to a social-ecological systems approach. In J. Denkinger & L. Vinueza (Eds.), The Galapagos Marine Reserve, social and ecological interactions in the Galapagos Islands (pp. 160–185). New York: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charles, A. T., Brainerd, T. R., Bermudez, M. A., Montalvo, H. M., & Pomeroy, S. R. (1994). Fisheries socioeconomics in the developing world: Regional assessments and an annotated bibliography. Ottawa: IDRC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2009). Governance assessment for fisheries and coastal systems: A reality check. Human Ecology, 37, 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., & Jentoft, S. (2013). Assessing governability – What’s next. In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture. Theory and applications (MARE publications series 7, pp. 335–349). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chuenpagdee, R., Degnbol, P., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Johnson, D., Pullin, R., & Williams, S. (2005). Challenges and concerns in capture fisheries and aquaculture. In J. Kooiman, M. Bavinck, S. Jentoft, & R. Pullin (Eds.), Fish for life. Interactive governance for fisheries (pp. 25–37). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cinner, J. E., Daw, T., & McClanahan, T. R. (2009). Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conservation Biology, 23, 124–130.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clifford, N. J., & Valentine, G. (Eds.). (2003). Key methods in geography. London/Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coello, S., & Fundación Natura. (1993). Diagnóstico de la Actividad Pesquera en la Zona de Influencia del Parque Nacional Machalilla. Estudios en Áreas Protegidas. Volumen 5. Fundación Natura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comisión Permanente del Pacífico Sur (CPPS). (2000). Plan de Acción para la Protección del Medio Marino y Áreas Costeras del Pacífico Sudeste. Quito: Estado del Medio Ambiente Marino y Costero del Pacífico Sudeste.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danulat, E., & Edgar, G. (Eds.). (2002). Reserva Marina de Galápagos. Línea Base de la Biodiversidad. Santa Cruz: Fundación Charles Darwin/Servicio Parque Nacional Galápagos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defeo, O., & Castilla, J. C. (2012). Governance and governability of coastal shellfisheries in Latin America and the Caribbean: Multi-scale emerging models and effects of globalization and climate change. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 4, 344–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Defeo, O., Castrejón, M., Pérez-Castañeda, R., Castilla, J. C., Gutiérrez, N., Essington, T. E., & Folke, C. (2014). Co-management in Latin American small-scale shell fisheries: Assessment from long-term case studies. Fish & Fisheries Journal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dirección Parque Nacional Galápagos (DPNG). (2014). Plan de Manejo de las Áreas Protegidas de Galápagos para el Buen Vivir. Galápagos: Puerto Ayora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez, B., Casquete, C., & Suárez-Avilés, J. (1991). Análisis socioeconómico de los pescadores artesanales de la zona sur de Manabí, Caso específico: Puerto Cayo, Machalilla, Puerto López y Salango. Tesis de Economista, Universidad de Guayaquil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ecuadorian National Constitution. (2008). Supra note 5, at art. 71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgar, G. J., Banks, S., Fariña, J. M., Calvopiña, M., & Martínez, C. (2004). Regional biogeography of shallow reef fish and macro-invertebrate communities in the Galapagos archipelago. Journal of Biogeography, 31, 1107–1124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESPOL, CEPLAES, & ILDIS. (1987). La pesca artesanal en el Ecuador. Quito: CEPLAES.

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2013). Fisheries in Ecuador. Retrieved October 3, 2013, from http://www.fao.org/fi/oldsite/FCP/es/ecu/body.htm

  • FAO. (2014). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Opportunities and challenges. Rome: FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department/Food and Agriculture Organization. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from www.fao.org

  • Finley, C. (2009). The social construction of fishing, 1949. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 6. Retrieved June 22, 2012, from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art6/

  • Gaibor, N., Rosero, J., & Altamirano, M. (2002). El Impacto de la Migración Humana en las Artes Pesqueras Artesanales y Semi-industriales utilizadas en los Parques Nacionales Galápagos (Isla Isabela) y Machalilla. Informe de Consultoría, The Nature Conservancy/Fundación Natura, La Unión.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, C. (2007). Conservación Contra Natura. Las Islas Galápagos. Quito: AbyaYala.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1997). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity Press, as cited in Keulartz, J., van der Windt, H., & Swart, J. (2004). Concepts of nature as communicative devices: the case of Dutch nature policy. Environmental Values, 13(1), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, L., Ikegami, M., Hole, D. G., Seo, C., Butchart, S. H. M., Townsend Peterson, A., & Roehrdanz, P. R. (2013). Global climate change adaptation priorities for biodiversity and food security. Plos One, 8(8), e72590.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hauck, M. (2007). Non-compliance in small-scale fisheries. A threat to security? In P. Beirne & N. South (Eds.), Issues in green criminology. Confronting harms against environments, humanity, and other animals (pp. 270–290). Willan Publishing, Cornwall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heylings, P., & Bravo, M. (2007). Evaluating governance: A process for understanding how co-management is functioning, and why, in the Galapagos Marine Reserve. Ocean and Coastal Management, 50, 174–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honey, M., & Littlejohn, A. (1994). Paying the price of ecotourism. The Americas, 46(6), 40–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadísticas y Censos (INEC). (2010). Censo Nacional de Población y Vivienda. Retrieved December 10, 2013, from http://www.ecuadorencifras.gob.ec/censo-de-poblacion-y-vivienda/

  • Jacquet, J., Alava, J. J., Ganapathiraju, P., & Henderson, S. (2008). In hotsoup: Sharks captured in Ecuador’s waters. Environmental Sciences, 5(4), 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jara, C. J. (1987). Y si la pesca artesanal desaparece? In ESPOL, CEPLAES, & TLDIS (Eds.), La pesca artesanal en el Ecuador (pp. 129–137). Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S. (1989). Fisheries co-management: Delegating government responsibility to fishermen’s organizations. Marine Policy, 13, 137–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2013). Concerns and problems in fisheries and aquaculture exploring governability. In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture. Theory and applications (MARE publications series 7, pp. 33–44). Dordrecht/New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jobstvogt, N. (2010). Fish stock assessment of top-predator wahoo, Acanthocybium solandri, in the Galapagos Islands. Diploma thesis, Department of Biology, Chemistry & Pharmacy. Faculty of Biology, Freie Universität Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josse, C., & Iturralde, M. (Eds.). (2002). Compendio de Investigaciones en el Parque Nacional Machalilla. Fundación Natura/Centro de Datos para la Conservación, CDC-Ecuador. Quito: Nuevo Arte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, G. N., & Swaffield, S. R. (2012). Identifying cultural service values of a small river in the agricultural landscape of Canterbury, New Zealand, using combined methods. Society & Natural Resources, 25(12), 1330–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keulartz, J., van der Windt, H., & Swart, J. (2004). Concepts of nature as communicative devices: The case of Dutch nature policy. Environmental Values, 13(1), 81–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J. (2008). Exploring the concept of governability. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 10(2), 171–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 171–190. ISSN 1602–229. Retrieved from http://www.journal-tes.dk/

  • Kosamu, I. B. M. (2015). Conditions for sustainability of small-scale fisheries in developing countries. Fisheries Research, 161, 365–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (pp. 31–44). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marder, R., & Arcos, C. (1985). Normas Societarias, Actitudes, Grupos de Poder y Conflicto en Galápagos. Documento para Discusión, Cuaderno No. 7. Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Departamento de Sociología.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martínez, J., Cobeña, M., & Domínguez, C. (1997). Las pesquerías artesanales de Puerto López (provincia de Manabí-Ecuador) durante 1996. Realizado por el Área de Pesca del Programa de Cooperación Técnica para la Pesca Unión Europea-VECEP ALA92/43. Inf. Téc. PESCART 03/97. Ecuador. In Gaibor et al. (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mays, N., & Pope, C. (1995). Rigour in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 311, 109–112.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, C., & Silva, M. I. (1998). Arqueología y comunidad en el Parque Nacional Machalilla. In C. Josse & M. Iturralde (Eds.) (2002). Compendio de Investigaciones en el Parque Nacional Machalilla. Quito: Fundación Natura/Centro de Datos para la onservación, CDC-Ecuador. Editorial Nuevo Arte.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreno, A., & Hearn, A. (2007). Investigación Pesquera. Investigación para el Manejo. In Fundación Natura and WWF (1999) Galapagos report 1998–1999 (pp. 19–29). Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, P. (1985). Boletín de los museos del Banco Central N° 6. Simposio 45 Congreso Internacional de Americanistas. Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., & Dinerstein, E. (1998). The global 200: A representation approach to conserving the Earth’s most biologically valuable ecoregions. Conservation Biology, 12(3), 502–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E. D., Wikramanayake, N. D., Burgess, G. V. N., Powell, E. C., Underwood, J. A., D’Amico, I., Itoua, H. E., Strand, J. C., Morrison, C. J., Loucks, T. F., & Allnutt, T. H. (2002). The global 200: Priority ecoregions for global conservation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, 89, 199–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ospina, P. (2001). Identidades en Galápagos. El sentimiento de una diferencia. Quito: Trama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacios, P., & Schuhbauer, A. (2012). Tourism as an economic alternative for Galapagos fishers: Opportunities and lessons learned (pp. 109–113). Galápagos report 2011–2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parque Nacional Galápagos (PNG). (1996). Management plan for conservation and sustainable use of the Galapagos marine reserve. Galapagos National Park Service, Puerto Ayora: Galápagos Islands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parque Nacional Galápagos (PNG). (2006). Plan de Manejo. Ministerio del Ambiente/Parque Nacional Galápagos. Quito: Arte Digital.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., Christensen, V., Guénette, S., Pitcher, J., Sumaila, U. R., Walters, C. J., Watson, R., & Zeller, D. (2002). Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Insight Review. Nature, 418, 689–695.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pauly, D., Watson, R., & Alder, J. (2005). Global trends in world fisheries: Impacts on marine ecosystems and food security. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 360, 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, R. I., Ommer, R. E., Barange, M., Jentoft, S., Neis, B., & Sumaila, U. R. (2011). Marine social-ecological responses to environmental change and the impacts of globalization. Fish & Fisheries, 12, 427–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, E. (1994). Summary and conclusion. In C. L. Dyer & J. R. McGoodwin (Eds.), Folk management in the world´s fisheries: Lessons for modern fisheries management (pp. 317–337). Colorado: University of Colorado Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollnac, R. B., & Poggie, J. J. (2008). Happiness, well-being and psycho-cultural adaptation to the stresses associated with marine fishing. Special Section on Vulnerability and Resilience in Fisheries. Human Ecology Review, 15(2), 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollnac, R. B., & Bavinck, M. (2008). Alternative livelihoods and job satisfaction among fishermen: a cross-national study. In EOCST: Ecosystems, societies, consilience, precautionary principle: Development of an assessment method of the societal cost for best fishing practices and efficient public policies. D4SA Ecoregion report on sociological aspects: Results of the Job Satisfaction surveys of all case-studies (85 pp).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomeroy, R., & Berkes, F. (1997). Two to tango: The role of government in fisheries co-management. Marine Policy, 21, 465–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez, J. (2004). La Pesca Artesanal en la Reserva Marina de Galápagos. Dinámica Laboral y Conflictos Socio-Ambientales. Disertación Licenciatura en Antropología Social, Facultad de Ciencias Humanas, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador, Quito.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reck, G. K. (1983). The coastal fisheries in the Galápagos Islands, Ecuador: Description and consequences for management in the context of marine environmental protection and regional development. Doctoral thesis, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodríguez, W. T. (1987). Pesquerías Artesanales en las Islas Galápagos, Ecuador. en: J. Martínez, A. Ansaldo, & M. Hurtado (1987) La Pesca Artesanal en el Ecuador. Guayaquil: Instituto Nacional de Pesca.

    Google Scholar 

  • SETEMAR. (2013). La Pesca en el Ecuador. Cap. 1 (48 pp). Technical report.

    Google Scholar 

  • SRP. (2013). http://www.subpesca.gob.ec/subpesca. Accessed 04 Oct 2013.

  • Stewart, M. L. F. (2009). Of fish and men: An economic analysis of the Galapagos Marine Reserve Resources Management Plan. Doctoral thesis, Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California Davis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, S., Viteri, C., Conrad, J., Nøstbakken, L., & Franklin, H. (2006). Fisheries management in the Galapagos Marine Reserve: A bioeconomic perspective. Region 3 Barbados, Colombia, Ecuador, Guyana, Jamaica, Peru, Suriname, The Bahamas, Trinidad & Tobago, Venezuela. Economic and Sector Study Series. Washington: Inter-American Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suárez de Vivero, J. L., Rodríguez Mateos, J. C., & Florido del Corral, F. (2008). The paradox of public participation in fisheries governance. The rising number of actors and the devolution process. Marine Policy, 32, 319–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symes, D. (Ed.). (2000). Fisheries dependent regions. Oxford: Fishing New Books Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling. A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Usseglio, P., Schuhbauer, A., & Friedlander, A. (2014). Collaborative approach to fisheries management as a way to increase the effectiveness of future regulations in the Galapagos Archipelago. The Galapagos Marine Reserve. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walmsley, S. F., Howard, C. A., & Medley, P. A. (2005). Participatory fisheries stock assessment (ParFish) guidelines. London: MRAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, M. (1998). Aquatic resources. Education for the development of world needs. In D. Symes (Ed.) (2000). Fisheries dependent regions (pp. 164–174). Oxford: Fishing new Books Blackwell Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, M., Schuhbauer, A., & Castrejon, M. (2012). A revised strategy for the monitoring and management of the Galapagos Sea cucumber (Isostychopus fuscus). Revista de Biologia Tropical, 60(2), 539–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worm, B., Hilborn, R., Baum, J. K., Branch, T. A., Collie, J. S., Costello, C., Fogarty, F. G., Fulton, E. A., Hutchings, J. A., Jennings, S., et al. (2009). Rebuilding global fisheries. Science, 325(5940), 578–585.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the Fisheries Under-minister G. Morán, to other SRP staff members (V. Alvarado, R. Caiche, E. Castro, G. Cedeño, J.F. Bittar, I. Juez, G. Loor, J. López, and F. Vera), to E. Barragán, and to L. Maridueña who kindly contributed with valuable information to the development of this case study. Thanks to the two anonymous reviewers who greatly contributed to the improvement of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María José Barragán Paladines .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Barragán Paladines, M.J. (2015). Two Rules for the Same Fish: Small-Scale Fisheries Governance in Mainland Ecuador and Galapagos Islands. In: Jentoft, S., Chuenpagdee, R. (eds) Interactive Governance for Small-Scale Fisheries. MARE Publication Series, vol 13. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17034-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics