Skip to main content

Determining Significant Principal Components: a Probability Test For Eigenvalues

  • Conference paper
Proceedings of the 1984 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

When employing factor analysis a major problem confronting researchers is the determination of how many components to retain for subsequent investigation. Many marketing scholars address this issue by automatically invoking the Kaiser-Guttman, or eigenvalue-greater-than-one, procedure. Yet this procedure is not without certain limitations. The authors therefore propose an alternative measure, a probability test for the significance of eigenvalues, based upon a random intercepts model. Preliminary results of the application of the model on marketing and psychology data are presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Acito, Franklin and Ronald D. Anderson (1980), "A Monte Carlo Comparison of Factor Analytic Methods," Journal of Marketing Research, 17 (May), 228–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, —, and Jack L. Engledow (1980), "A Simulation Study of Methods for Hypothesis Testing in Factor Analysis," Journal of Consumer Research, 7 (September), 141–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, Raymond B. (1952), Factor Analysis. New York: Harper and Brothers.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and S. Vogelmann (1977), "A Comprehensive Trial of the Scree and KG Criteria for Determining the Number of Factors," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12 (July), 289–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, Frederick B. (1944), "Fundamental Factors of Comprehension in Reading," Psychometrika, 9 (September), 185–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feller, William (1966), An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleishman, Edwin A. and Walter E. Hempel, Jr. (1954), "Changes in Factor Structure of a Complex Psychomotor Test as a Function of Practice," Psychometrika, 19 (September), 239–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, Paul E. (1978), Analyzing Multivariate Data. Hinsdale, Illinois: Dryden Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakstian, A. Ralph and Victor J. Muller (1973), "Some Notes on the Number of Factors Problem," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 8 (October), 461–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, W. Todd Rogers, and Raymond B. Cattell (1982), "The Behavior of Number-of-Factors Rules with Simulated Data," Multivariate Behavioral Research, 17 (April), 193–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harman, Harry H. (1976), Modern Factor Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornik, Jacob (1980), "Quantitative Analysis of Visual Perception of Printed Advertisements," Journal of Advertising Research, 20 (December), 41–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaiser, Henry F. (1960), "The Application of Electronic Computers to Factor Analysis," Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20 (Spring), 141–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — (1970), "A Second Generation Little Jiffy," Psychometrika, 35 (December), 401–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —, and John Rice (1974), "Little Jiffy Mark IV," Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34 (Spring), 111–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlin, J. E. (1941), "Music Ability," Psychometrika, 6 (February), 61–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mukherjee, Bishwa N. (1971), "A Factor Analysis of Some Qualitative Attributes of Coffee," in Multivariate Analysis in Marketing: Theory and Application. David A. Aaker (ed.), Belmont, California: Wadsworth Publishing Co., 245–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandit, Vinay Y. (1978), "Data Breeding: Estimation of Micro-Data in an Incomplete Data Base." Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Graduate School of Business Administration, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, Jr., William D. and Frederick A. Russ (1976), "Physical Distribution Service in Industrial Purchase Decisions," Journal of Marketing, 40 (April), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephenson, William (1963), "Public Images of Public Utilities," Journal of Advertising Research, 3 (December), 34–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, David W. (1981), "The Application and Misapplication of Factor Analysis in Marketing Research," Journal of Marketing Research, 18 (February), 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hubbard, R., Pandit, V. (2015). Determining Significant Principal Components: a Probability Test For Eigenvalues. In: Lindquist, J.D. (eds) Proceedings of the 1984 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16973-6_98

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics