Abstract
Evandro Agazzi singles out one of the fundamental knots of Modernity: the demand for autonomy. Science was one of the first human activities in demanding its own autonomy. In a complementary sense, the autonomy of science has been one of the major factors contributing to the development of Modernity. The search for autonomy, as Agazzi suggests, has put in the hands of humanity positive and important results, but it has also led to some excesses. As a consequence of such excesses, at the decline of Modernity, a certain cultural uneasiness and a strong request for new balances and connections became manifest. Agazzi so proposes to activate the systemic approach to obtain such new balances. Science will thus fulfil at best its own constitutive goals, beginning with autonomy, certainly, but also in respect and consideration of other fields equally autonomous, like ethics. Finally, we must also clarify that the systemic approach proposed by Agazzi does not eliminate human freedom, nor practical rationality, but, to the contrary, makes them possible and powerful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The concept of life world—in German Lebenswelt—comes from the phenomenological tradition, and has been recently used by Habermas under the meaning of “background horizon of experience” and of “pre-reflective” life, from which, as a starting point, we may give meaning to whatever may be affirmed.
- 2.
Science and technology maintain each one its own peculiarities, but it is a given fact that nowadays they assume a symbiotic behaviour. In a systemic perspective we may categorize these two realities—science and technology—as subsystems of the techno-scientific system, which, in turn, can be considered as a social subsystem.
- 3.
Agazzi distinguishes two variables essential to science, i.e. production of rigorous and objective knowledge (v1) and its diffusion (v2). Further proof of the fruitfulness of Agazzi’s ideas is the possibility of building a systemic theory of the communication of science through the simple expedient of registering v2 in a specific subsystem called “science communication”. For a development of this idea see Marcos (2010: Chap. 6).
References
Agazzi, Evandro. 1992. Il bene, il male e la scienza: Le dimensioni etiche dell’impresa scientifico-tecnologica. Milano: Rusconi.
Agazzi, Evandro. 2001. Filosofía técnica y filosofía práctica. In Racionalidad científica y racionalidad humana, eds. Marga Vega, Carlos Maldonado and Alfredo Marcos, 35-52. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. 1968. General System theory: Foundations, Development, Applications. New York: George Braziller. (Revised edition 1976).
Habermas, Jürgen. 1968. Technik und Wissenschaft als Ideologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Kuhn, Thomas. 1977. The Essential Tension. Chicago: The Chicago University Press.
Ladrière, Jean. 1978. I rischi della razionalità. La sfida della scienza e della tecnologia alle culture. Torino: SEI.
Marcos, Alfredo. 2010. Filosofia dell’agire scientifico. Milano: Academia Universa Press.
Marcos, Alfredo. 2012. Dependientes y racionales: la familia humana. Cuadernos de bioética 23: 83-95.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Marcos, A. (2015). The Autonomy of Science in a Systems Theoretic Approach. In: Alai, M., Buzzoni, M., Tarozzi, G. (eds) Science Between Truth and Ethical Responsibility. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16369-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16369-7_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16368-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16369-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)