Abstract
This chapter brings the relationship between female participation in the labour market and social vulnerability into perspective arguing that local production systems and provisions of local welfare are crucial to better understand the determinants of women’s social vulnerability in 11 European cities. Social vulnerability refers to individuals and households who are not formally socially excluded, but characterized by a fragile integration into the traditional systems of social protection and resource distribution (welfare, family and the labour market). It is argued that either or both higher level employment and better employment of women determines a lower social vulnerability level, but its intensity and shape can change according to local contexts, characterized by the different conditions and criteria by which women access citizenship and take positions in local production systems. The first aspect is related to the conditionality and generosity of welfare benefits that are relevant in order to allow women to work (elderly care and childcare) and to be protected from social risks. The second aspect is related to the chance of women to be (or not to be) segregated and discriminated in their local labour markets.
The chapter will present both quantitative analysis by presenting a comparison among the 11 European cities and countries, and some qualitative analysis aimed at reconstructing the social and institutional mechanisms at the local level influencing social vulnerability. The analysis aims to understand the extent to which different patterns of participation in the labour market in different local contexts determine exposure to poverty, social vulnerability and low social participation.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Level of employment de-standardisation has been calculated roughly by adding part-timers to temporary workers. It is important to underline that they partially overlie in a percentage that we cannot estimate trough the Eurostat indicators. However, the aim of Fig. 4.1 is just to give an indication about the level of de-standardisation in the 11 different localities of interest, not to give an exact estimation of the phenomena.
- 2.
The divide between low and high female employment has been calculated on the threshold of 60 % employment rate, as the Lisbon strategy recommended for year 2010.
References
Barbieri, P., & Scherer, S. (2009). Labour market flexibilization and its consequences in Italy. European Sociological Review, 25(6), 677–692.
Bardasi, E., & Gornick, J. C. (2008). Working for less? Women’s part-time wage penalties across countries. Feminist Economics, 14(1), 37–72.
Barrère-Maurisson, A. (1994). Pour un redefinition du travail et de son partage. In M. De Coster & F. Pichault (Eds.), Traité de sociologie du travail (pp. 401–419). Bruxelles: De Boek.
Bianchi, S. M. (1999). Feminization and juvenilization of poverty: Trends, relative risks, causes and consequences. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 307–333.
Blossfeld, H., & Hakim, C. (1997). Between equalisation and marginalisation. Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bonoli, G. (2007). Time matters: Postindustrialization, new social risks, and welfare state adaptation in advanced industrial democracies. Comparative Political Studies, 40(5), 495–520.
Casper, L. M., McLanahan, S. S., & Garfinkel, I. (1994). The gender–poverty gap: What we can learn from other countries. American Sociological Review, 59, 594–605.
Castel, R. (1995). Les metamorphoses de la question sociale. Une cronique du salariat. Paris: Fayard.
Castel, R. (2003). L’insecurité sociale. Qu’est-ce qu’etre protégé? Paris: Editions du Seuil.
Clement, W., Mathieu, S., Prus, S., & Uckardesler, E. (2009). Restructuring work in the new economy: Four processes. In N. Pupo & M. Thomas (Eds.), Interrogating the new economy: Restructuring work in the 21st century (pp. 43–64). Toronto: Broadview Press.
Connell, R. (1987). Gender and power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Connell, R. (2002). Gender. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Cornia, G. A., & Court, J. (2001). Inequality, growth and poverty in the era of liberalization and globalization. UNU wider report. http://www.wider.unu.edu/publications/policy-briefs/en_GB/pb4/_files/78807311723331954/default/pb4.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014.
Crompton, R. (1999). Restructuring gender relations and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Curatolo, S., & Wolleb, G. (2010). Income vulnerability in Europe. In C. Ranci (Ed.), Social vulnerability in Europe. The new configuration of social risks (pp. 58–87). Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Daly, M. (2011). What adult worker model? A critical look at recent social policy reform in Europe from a gender and family perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 18(1), 1–23.
Daly, M., & Rake, K. (2003). Gender and the welfare state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Escott, K. (2012). Young women on the margins of the labour market. Work, Employment & Society, 26(3), 412–428.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). The social foundations of post-industrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Esping-Andersen, G. (2009). Incomplete revolution: Adapting welfare states to women’s new roles. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fagan, C., & Rubery, J. (1996). The salience of the part-time divide in the European Union. European Sociological Review, 12(3), 227–250.
Ferragina, E., Seeleib-Kaiser, M., & Tomlinson, M. (2013). Unemployment protection and family policy at the turn of the 21st century: A dynamic approach to welfare regime theory. Social Policy & Administration, 47(7), 783–805.
Ferrera, M. (1993). Modelli di solidarietà. Politica e riforme sociali nelle democrazie. Bologna: Il Mulino Editore.
Hakim, C. (1997). Sociological perspective on part-time work. In H. Blossfeld & C. Hakim (Eds.), Between equalization and marginalization. Women working part-time in Europe and the United States of America (pp. 22–70). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hakim, C. (2000). Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century. Preference theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jensen, P., & Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). ‘Active’ citizenship – The changing face of welfare. In J. G. Andersen, A. M. Guillemard, P. H. Jensen, & B. Pfau-Effinger (Eds.), The changing face of welfare: Consequences and outcomes from a citizenship perspective (pp. 1–14). Bristol: Policy Press.
Kahn, L. M. (2010). Employment protection reforms, employment and the incidence of temporary jobs in Europe: 1996–2001. Labour Economics, 17(1), 1–15.
Kim, J. W., & Choi, Y. J. (2013). Feminisation of poverty in 12 welfare states: Consolidating cross-regime variations? International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(4), 347–359.
Lancker, V. (2012). The European world of temporary employment: Gendered and poor? European Societies, 14(1), 83–111.
Lewis, J. (1993). Women and social politics in Europe. Hants/Brookfield: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Lewis, J. (2002). Gender and welfare state change. European Societies, 4(4), 331–357.
Maestripieri, L., & Sabatinelli, S. (2014). Young people experiencing work precariousness: Risks and opportunities. In C. Ranci, T. Brandsen, & S. Sabatinelli (Eds.), Social vulnerability in European cities. The role of local welfare in times of crisis (pp. 189–220). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mandel, H. (2010). Winners and losers: The consequences of welfare state policies for gender wage inequality. European Sociological Review, 28(2), 241–262.
Misra, J., & King, L. (2005). Women, gender and state policies. In T. Janoski, R. Alford, A. Hicks, & M. A. Schwartz (Eds.), The handbook of political sociology. States, civil societies and globalization (pp. 526–545). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Naldini, M., & Saraceno, C. (2011). Conciliare famiglia e lavoro. Vecchi e nuovi patti tra sessi e generazioni. Bologna: Il Mulino Editore.
OECD. (2012). Gender equality in education, employment and entrepreneurship: Final report to the MCM 2012. www.oecd.org/els/soc/50423364.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2014.
Pavolini, E., & Ranci, C. (2011). Beyond the male breadwinner model. In C. Ranci (Ed.), Social vulnerability in Europe (pp. 37–57). New York: Palgrave McMillan.
Pearce, D. (1978). The feminization of poverty: Women, work, and welfare. Urban and Social Change Review, 11, 28–36.
Pfau-Effinger, B. (2005). Welfare state policies and the development of care arrangements. European Societies, 7(2), 321–347.
Pontusson, J. (2005). Inequality and prosperity. Social Europe vs. Liberal America. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.
Ranci, C. (2010). Social vulnerability in Europe. The new configuration of social risks. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reyneri, E. (2007). L’analisi sociologica dei mercati del lavoro. In M. Regini (Ed.), La sociologia economica contemporanea (pp. 33–57). Bari: Edizioni Laterza.
Sainsbury, D. (1996). Gender equality and welfare states. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sassen, S. (1991). The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Sennet, R. (1998). The corrosion of character. The personal consequences of work in the new capitalism. New York/London: Norton & Co.
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004). New risks, new welfare. The transformation of the European welfare state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thévenon, O. (2013). Drivers of female labour force participation in the OECD. OECD social, employment and migration working papers, No. 145. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/5k46cvrgnms6.pdf?expires=1405946389&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=66DE125EBBF903DB450C2A83B2E55557. Accessed 21 July.
Vosko, L. (2010). Managing the margins. Gender, citizenship, and the international regulation of precarious employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vosko, L., Macdonald, M., & Campbell, I. (2009). Gender and the contours of precarious employment. Oxon: Routledge.
Walby, S. (1997). Gender transformations. London: Routledge.
Walby, S. (2004). The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 11(1), 4–29.
Wallace, C., Mathieu, S., Prus, S., & Uckardesler, E. (2009). Precarious lives in the new economy. Comparative intersectional analysis. In L. Vosko, M. Macdonald, & I. Campbell (Eds.), Gender and the contours of precarious employment (pp. 240–256). Oxon: Routledge.
Warnecke, T. (2008). Women as wives, mothers or workers: How welfare eligibility requirements influence female labor force participation – A case study of Spain. Journal of Economic Issues, XLII(4), 981–1004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Maestripieri, L. (2015). Gendering Social Vulnerability. The Role of Labour Market De-standardisation and Local Welfare. In: Kutsar, D., Kuronen, M. (eds) Local Welfare Policy Making in European Cities. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 59. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16163-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16163-1_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16162-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16163-1
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)