Skip to main content

What is Quantum? Unifying Its Micro-physical and Structural Appearance

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Quantum Interaction (QI 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8951))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We can recognize two modes in which ‘quantum appears’ in macro domains: (i) a micro-physical appearance, where quantum laws are assumed to be universal and they are transferred from the micro to the macro level if suitable quantum coherence conditions (e.g., very low temperatures) are realized, (ii) a structural appearance, where no hypothesis is made on the validity of quantum laws at a micro level, while genuine quantum aspects are detected at a structural-modeling level. In this paper, we inquire into the connections between the two appearances. We put forward the explanatory hypothesis that, ‘the appearance of quantum in both cases’ is due to ‘the existence of a specific form of organisation, which has the capacity to cope with random perturbations that would destroy this organisation when not coped with’. We analyse how ‘organisation of matter’, ‘organisation of life’, and ‘organisation of culture’, play this role each in their specific domain of application, point out the importance of evolution in this respect, and put forward how our analysis sheds new light on ‘what quantum is’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    Some authors [45] have recently observed that our example The Animal Acts does not satisfy the marginal law, which would entail that Bell’s inequalities are not informative in this case. In this respect, we have also elaborated an explicit quantum model for The Animal Acts situation, showing that entanglement is present in both states and measurements [46]. This result supports our claim that the violation of Bell’s inequalities is due to the entanglement between the considered concepts.

References

  1. Kapitza, P.: Viscosity of liquid helium below the l-point. Nature 141, 74–75 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. London, F.: The \(\lambda \)-phenomenon of liquid Helium and the Bose-Einstein degeneracy. Nature 141, 643–644 (1938)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardeen, J., Cooper, L.N., Schrieffer, J.R.: Theory of superconductivity. Phy. Rev. 108, 1175–1205 (1957)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Rauch, H., Zeilinger, A., Badurek, G., Wilfing, A., Bauspiess, W., Bonse, U.: Verification of coherent spinor rotation of fermions. Phys. Lett. A 54, 425–427 (1975)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aspect, A., Grangier, P., Roger, G.: Experimental realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm Gedankenexperiment. A new Violation of Bell’s Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Anderson, M.H., Ensher, J.R., Matthews, M.R., Wieman, C.E., Cornell, E.A.: Observation of Bose-Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor. Science 269, 198–201 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tittel, W., Brendel, J., Gisin, B., Herzog, T., Zbinden, H., Gisin, N.: Experimental demonstration of quantum correlations over more than 10 km. Phys. Rev. A 57, 3229–3232 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Arndt, M., Nairz, O., Vos-Andreae, J., Keller, C., van der Zouw, G., Zeilinger, A.: Wave-particle duality of C 60 molecules. Nature 401, 680–682 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Salart, D., Baas, A., van Houwelingen, J.A.W., Gisin, N., Zbinden, H.: Spacelike separation in a Bell test assuming gravitationally induced collapses. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 220404 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gerlich, S., Eibenberger, S., Tomandl, M., Nimmrichter, S., Hornberger, K., Fagan, P.J., Tüxen, J., Mayor, M., Arndt, M.: Quantum interference of large organic molecules. Nature Commun. 2, 263 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Plumhof, J.D., Stöferle, T., Mai, L., Scherf, U., Mahrt, R.F.: Room-temperature Bose-Einstein condensation of cavity exciton-polaritons in a polymer. Nat. Mater. 13, 247–252 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Aerts, D., Aerts, S.: Applications of quantum statistics in psychological studies of decision processes. Found. Sci. 1, 85–97 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Van Rijsbergen, K.: The Geometry of Information Retrieval. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Aerts, D., Czachor, M.: Quantum aspects of semantic analysis and symbolic artificial intelligence. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 37, L123–L132 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations I. The structure of the sets of contexts and properties. Kybernetes 34, 167–191 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Aerts, D., Gabora, L.: A theory of concepts and their combinations II. A Hilbert space representation. Kybernetes 34, 192–221 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Widdows, D.: Geometry And Meaning. CSLI Publications, University of Chicago Press, Stanford, Chicago (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Melucci, M.: A basis for information retrieval in context. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26, 1–41 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Aerts, D.: Quantum particles as conceptual entities: a possible explanatory framework for quantum theory. Found. Sci. 14, 361–411 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Aerts, D.: Quantum structure in cognition. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 314–348 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Khrennikov, A., Haven, E.: Quantum mechanics and violations of the sure-thing principle: the use of probability interference and other concepts. J. Math. Psychol. 53, 378–388 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Aerts, D., D’Hooghe, B., Haven, E.: Quantum experimental data in psychology and economics. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 49, 2971–2990 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Quantum structures in cognition: Why and how concepts are entangled. In: Song, D., Melucci, M., Frommholz, I., Zhang, P., Wang, L., Arafat, S. (eds.) QI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7052, pp. 116–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Busemeyer, J.R., Pothos, E., Franco, R., Trueblood, J.S.: A quantum theoretical explanation for probability judgment ‘errors’. Psycholical Rev. 118, 193–218 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Busemeyer, J.R., Bruza, P.D.: Quantum Models of Cognition and Decision. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Busemeyer, J.R., Dubois, F., Lambert-Mogiliansky, A., Melucci, M. (eds.): QI 2012. LNCS, vol. 7620. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Aerts, D., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Quantum structure and human thought. Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 274–276 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Aerts, D., Gabora, L., Sozzo, S.: Concepts and their dynamics: A quantum-theoretic modeling of human thought. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 737–772 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Pothos, E.M., Busemeyer, J.R.: Can quantum probability provide a new direction for cognitive modeling? Behav. Brain Sci. 36, 255–274 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Haven, E., Khrennikov, A.: Quantum Social Science. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2013)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Aerts, D., Czachor, M., Kuna, M., Sinervo, B., Sozzo, S.: Quantum probabilistic structures in competing lizard communities. Ecol. Model. 281, 38–51 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. de Broglie, L.: Ondes et Quanta. C. R. 177, 507–510 (1923)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Einstein, A.: Zur quantentheorie der strahlung. Physikalische Zeitschrift 18, 121–128 (1917)

    Google Scholar 

  35. d’Enterria, D., da Silveira, G.G.: Observing light-by-light scattering at the Large Hadron Collider. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 080405 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mackey, G.W.: Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. W. A. Benjamin, New York (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Piron, C.: Foundations of Quantum Physics. Benjamin, Reading (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Aerts, D.: A possible explanation for the probabilities of quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phys. 27, 202–210 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Aerts, D., Durt, T., Grib, A., Van Bogaert, B., Zapatrin, A.: Quantum structures in macroscopical reality. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 32, 489–498 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Aerts, D., Aerts, S., Broekaert, J., Gabora, L.: The violation of Bell inequalities in the macroworld. Found. Phys. 30, 1387–1414 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Khrennikov, A.Y.: Ubiquitous Quantum Structure. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Wang, Z., Busemeyer, J.R., Atmanspacher, H., Pothos, E.M.: The potential of using quantum theory to build models of cognition. Top. Cogn. Sci. 5, 672–688 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Sozzo, S.: A quantum probability model in Fock space for borderline contradictions. J. Math. Psychol. 58, 1–12 (2014)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Hampton, J.A.: Disjunction of natural concepts. Mem. Cogn. 16, 579–591 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Dzhafarov, E.N., Kujala, J.V.: On selective influences, marginal selectivity, and Bell/CHSH inequalities. Top. Cogn. Sci. 6, 121–128 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S.: Quantum entanglement in concept combinations. International Journal of Theoretical Physics (2014). doi:10.1007/s10773-013-1946-z. In press

  47. Bell, J.S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics 1, 195–200 (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Aerts, D.: A potentiality and conceptuality interpretation of quantum physics. Philosophica 83, 15–52 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Aerts, D.: Quantum theory and human perception of the macro-world. To appear in Frontiers in Perception Science (2014). arXiv:1403.4307

  50. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., Moll, H.: Understanding and sharing intentions: the origins of cultural cognition. Behav. Brain Sci. 28, 675–691 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Aerts, D., Sozzo, S., Veloz T.: The quantum nature of identity and Bose-Einstein statistics in human concepts (2014) (in preparation)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Sarovar, M., Ishizaki, A., Fleming, G.R., Whaley, K.B.: Quantum entanglement in photosynthetic light-harvesting complexes. Nat. Phys. 6, 462–467 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandro Sozzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Aerts, D., Sozzo, S. (2015). What is Quantum? Unifying Its Micro-physical and Structural Appearance. In: Atmanspacher, H., Bergomi, C., Filk, T., Kitto, K. (eds) Quantum Interaction. QI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8951. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15931-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15930-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15931-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics