Abstract
Social auditing refers to the practice of external assurance or evaluation of an organisation's socially responsible reporting assertions. Usually, the reporting frameworks organisations use, such as the Global Reporting Index, are voluntary codes of reporting. For auditors accepting an engagement to review or assure such social reporting, the appropriate standards may be similarly voluntary. It is only during this century that financial accounting and reporting has developed a universal set of standards for assurance work on such engagements. By briefly tracing the history of financial reporting audit standards from no regulation, to self-regulation, to mandatory regulation, this chapter highlights the challenges to regulation of social audit faced by auditors, and identifies issues pertaining to auditor liability on social audits. Discussions about potential liability can be a useful lens to critique proposed solutions.
-
Quality standards and social auditing
-
Social audit regulation, issues and challenges
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
425 U.S. 185 (1976).
- 2.
We have not included general criminal liability for fraud in this chapter. We are confining the scope to liability of auditors who carry out their routine functions—not liability of auditors who are dishonest, fraudulent or reckless.
- 3.
[1932] AC 562.
- 4.
In Daniels t/as Deloitte Haskins & Sells v AWA Ltd (1995) 16 ACSR 607, the end result was that the Court apportioned damage as 80 % contribution by the auditor and 20 % contribution by client management for the client firm’s loss a result of the audit failure.
- 5.
- 6.
[1896] 2 Ch 279.
- 7.
[1895] 2 Ch 673.
- 8.
[1958] 1 WLR 45.
- 9.
[1925] Ch 407.
- 10.
Part 2 M.4 Div 3 Auditor Independence Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- 11.
Part 2 M.4 division 5 Auditor rotation for listed companies Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- 12.
Section 324CI Corporations Act 2001(Cth).
- 13.
Section 300(11B) Corporations Act 2001(Cth).
- 14.
(1970) 92 WN (NSW) 29.
- 15.
[1961] 2 All ER 167.
- 16.
(1992) 10 ACLC 933.
- 17.
(1997) 188 CLR 241.
- 18.
(1990) 8 ACLC 3,011.
- 19.
Global Reporting Initiative guidelines, Dow Jones Sustainability Index, ISO14000 (environmental) series.
- 20.
ISAE 3000 (Revised), Assurance Engagements Other than Audits or Reviews of Historical Financial Information International Framework for Assurance Engagements and Related Conforming Amendments, para 12. See also Hassan et al. (2005).
- 21.
(1931) 174 NE 441.
- 22.
(1997) 188 CLR 241, 249–254 (Dawson J), 271–272 (McHugh J), 301 (Gummow J).
References
Alexander, D., & Jermakowicz, E. (2006). True and fair view of the principles/rules debate. Abacus, 42, 132–164.
Anderson, H. (1996). A different solution to the auditors’ liability dilemma. Bond Law Review, 8, Article 4.
Arens, A., Elder, R., & Beasley, M. (2002). Auditing and Assurance Services (9th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice‐Hall.
Baker, C. R., Bedard, J., & Hauret, C. P. (2014). The regulation of statutory auditing: An institutional theory approach. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29, 371–394.
Bauer, R., & Fenn, D. H., Jr. (1972). The corporate social audit. New York: Russell Sage.
Birkett, W. P., & Walker, R. G. (1971). Response of the Australian accounting profession to failures in the 1960s. Abacus, 7, 97–136.
Boehme, T. C., & Braddock, L. A. (1965). The Accountancy Research Foundation. The Australian Accountant, 573–4.
Brown, R. G. (1962). Changing audit objectives and techniques. The Accounting Review, 696–703.
Cane, P. (1991). Tort law and economic interests. Oxford: Clarendon.
Carnegie, G., & O’Connell, B. (2012). Understanding responses of professional accounting bodies to crises: The case of the Australian profession in the 1960s. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25, 835–875.
Chapple, L. J., & Koh, B. (2007). Regulatory responses to auditor independence dilemmas–who takes the stronger line? Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 21, 1–21.
Chung, J., Farrar, J., Puri, P., & Thorne, L. (2010). Auditor liability to third parties after Sarbanes-Oxley: An international comparison of regulatory and legal reforms. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 19, 66–78.
Clarke, F., & Dean, G. (2007). Indecent disclosure: Gilding the corporate lily. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, F., Dean, G., & Oliver, K. (1997). Corporate collapse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Corbett, A. (1994). The rationale for the recovery of economic loss in negligence and the problem of auditors’ liability. Melbourne University Law Review, 19, 814–867.
Fitzpatrick, L. (1939). The story of bookkeeping, accounting and auditing. Accounting Digest, 217
Fogarty, M., & Lansley, A. (2002). Sleepers awake! Future directions for auditing in Australia. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 25, 408–433.
Free, C. (1999). Limiting auditors’ liability. Bond Law Review, 11, article 7.
Gibson, R., & Arnold, R. (1981). The development of auditing standards in Australia. Accounting Historians Journal, 8, 51–65.
Global Reporting Initiative. (2013). G4 Sustainability reporting guidelines: Reporting principles and standard disclosures. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19, 793–819.
Hassan, M., Maijoor, S., Mock, T., Roebuck, P., Simnett, R., & Vanstraelen, A. (2005). The different types of assurance services and levels of assurance provided. International Journal of Auditing, 9, 91–102.
Hecimovic, A., Martinov-Bennie, N., & Roebuck, P. (2009). The force of law: Australian auditing standards and their impact on the auditing profession. Australian Accounting Review, 19, 1–10.
Higson, A. (2003). Developments in auditing and assurance in corporate financial reporting: Theory and practice. London: Sage.
Huggins, A., Green, W., & Simnett, R. (2011). The competitive market for assurance engagements on Greenhouse Gas statements: Is there a role for assurers from the accounting profession? Current Issues in Auditing, 5, A1–A12.
ICAEW. (2010). Sustainability assurance: Your choice (re: Assurance initiative). London: Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
ICAS. (2012). A professional judgment framework for financial reporting: An international guide for preparers, auditors, regulators and standard setters. Edinburgh: Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland.
Junior, R., Best, P., & Cotter, J. (2014). Sustainability reporting and assurance: A historical analysis on a word-wide phenomenon. Journal of Business Ethics, 120, 1–11.
KPMG. (2011). Elevating professional judgment in auditing and accounting: The KPMG professional judgment framework. New Jersey: KPMG.
Lee, T. H., & Ali, A. M. (2008). The evolution of auditing: An analysis of the historical development. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 4, 1–8.
Littleton, A. C. (1933). Accounting evolution to 1900. New York: American Institute Publishing Co.
McGladrey, L. L. P. (2012). Using professional judgment in auditing: McGladrey’s framework. Minneapolis: McGladrey.
Mock, T., Rao, S., & Srivastava, R. (2013). The development of worldwide sustainability reporting assurance. Australian Accounting Review, 23, 280–294.
Montgomery, R. H. (1913). Auditing theory and practice. New York: The Ronald Press Company.
Morimoto, R., Ash, J., & Hope, C. (2005). Corporate social responsibility audit: From theory to practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 315–325.
Porter, B. (2007). Auditors’ responsibilities with respect to corporate fraud—A controversial issue. In M. Sherer & S. Turley (Eds.), Current issues in auditing. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
Ramsay, I. (2001). Independence of Australian company auditors: Review of current Australian requirements and proposals for reform. Report to the Minister for Financial Services and Regulation.
Ramsay, I., & Austin, R. (online) Ford’s principles of corporate law. Sydney: Lexis Nexis Australia.
Report, C. (1992). The financial aspects of corporate governance. London: The Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance and Gee and Co. Ltd.
Samsonova, A. (2010). Rethinking auditor liability: The case of the European Union’s regulatory reform. Paper presented at Asia Pacific Interdisciplinary research in Accounting (APIRA) conference, Sydney, Australia.
Simnett, R., Nugent, M., & Huggins, A. (2009). Developing an international assurance standard on Greenhouse Gas statements. Accounting Horizons, 23, 347–363.
Simnett, R., Vanstraelen, A., & Chua, W. F. (2009). Assurance on sustainability reports: An international comparison. The Accounting Review, 84, 937–967.
Tackett, J., Wolf, F., & Claypool, G. (2004). Sarbanes‐Oxley and audit failure: A critical examination. Managerial Auditing Journal, 19, 340–350.
Acknowledgements
We thank colleagues Scott Hirst and YuYu Zhang for their helpful comments and support, and we are grateful to the anonymous reviewer for their insights that have helped focus the chapter’s contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chapple, L.E., Mui, G.Y. (2015). Social Audit Failure: Legal Liability of External Auditors. In: Rahim, M., Idowu, S. (eds) Social Audit Regulation. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15838-9_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15838-9_14
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15837-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15838-9
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)