Skip to main content

Model Order Reduction of Nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli Beam

  • Conference paper
Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 1

Abstract

Numerical simulations of large-scale models of complex systems are essential to modern research and development. However these simulations are also problematic by requiring excessive computational resources and large data storage. High fidelity reduced order models (ROMs) can be used to overcome these difficulties, but are hard to develop and test. A new framework for identifying subspaces suitable for ROM development has been recently proposed. This framework is based on two new concepts: (1) dynamic consistency which indicates how well does the ROM preserve the dynamical properties of the full-scale model; and (2) subspace robustness which indicates the suitability of ROM for a range of initial conditions, forcing amplitudes, and system parameters. This framework has been tested on relatively low-dimensional systems; however, its feasibility for more complex systems is still unexplored.

A 58 degree-of-freedom fixed-fixed nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli beam is studied, where large-amplitude forcing introduces geometrical nonlinearities. The responses of the beam subjected to both harmonic and random loads are obtained using finite difference method. The ROM subspaces are identified using the framework with both Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) and Smooth Orthogonal Decomposition (SOD). POD- and SOD-based ROMs are then compared and fidelity of the new framework is evaluated.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chelidze D (2014) Identifying robust subspaces for dynamically consistent reduced-order models. Nonlinear Dyn 2:123–130

    Google Scholar 

  2. Segala DB, Chelidze D (2013) Robust and dynamically consistent reduced order models. In: ASME 2013 international mechanical engineering congress and exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, pp V04BT04A010–V04BT04A010

    Google Scholar 

  3. Foias C, Jolly MS, Kevrekidis IG, Sell GR, Titi ES (1988) On the computation of inertial manifolds. Phys Lett A 131(7):433–436

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Pesheck E, Pierre C, Shaw SW (2002) A new Galerkin-based approach for accurate non-linear normal modes through invariant manifolds. J Sound Vib 249(5):971–993

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldmann P, Freund RW (1995) Efficient linear circuit analysis by Padé approximation via the Lanczos process. Comput Aid Des Integr Circuit Syst 14(5):639–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Amabili M, Sarkar A, Paıdoussis MP (2003) Reduced-order models for nonlinear vibrations of cylindrical shells via the proper orthogonal decomposition method. J Fluids Struct 18(2):227–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Georgiou I (2005) Advanced proper orthogonal decomposition tools: using reduced order models to identify normal modes of vibration and slow invariant manifolds in the dynamics of planar nonlinear rods. Nonlinear Dyn 41(1–3):69–110

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hall K, Thomas J, Dowell E (1999) Reduced-order modelling of unsteady small-disturbance flows using a frequency-domain proper orthogonal decomposition technique. In 37th Aerospace Science Meeting and Exhibit, no. AIAA Paper 99-0655

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kerschen G, Golinval JC, Vakakis AF, Bergman LA (2005) The method of proper orthogonal decomposition for dynamical characterization and order reduction of mechanical systems: an overview. Nonlinear Dyn 41(1–3):147–169

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Rathinam M, Petzold LR (2003) A new look at proper orthogonal decomposition. SIAM J Numer Anal 41(5):1893–1925

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Smith TR, Moehlis J, Holmes P (2005) Low-dimensional modeling of turbulence using the proper orthogonal decomposition: a tutorial. Nonlinear Dyn 41(1–3):275–307

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Willcox K, Peraire J (2002) Balanced model reduction via the proper orthogonal decomposition. AIAA J 40(11):2323–2330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Phillips JR (2003) Projection-based approaches for model reduction of weakly nonlinear, time-varying systems. IEEE Trans Comput Aid Design Integr Circuits Syst 22(2):171–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bai Z (2002) Krylov subspace techniques for reduced-order modeling of large-scale dynamical systems. Appl Num Math 43(1):9–44

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Carr J (1981) Applications of centre manifold theory. Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  16. Guckenheimer J, Holmes P (1983) Nonlinear oscillations, dynamical systems, and bifurcations of vector fields, vol 42. Springer, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Shaw S, Pierre C (1991) Non-linear normal modes and invariant manifolds. J Sound Vib 150(1):170–173

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Shaw SW, Pierre C (1993) Normal modes for non-linear vibratory systems. J Sound Vib 164(1):85–124

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaw SW, Pierre C (1994) Normal modes of vibration for non-linear continuous systems. J Sound Vib 169(3):319–347

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vakakis AF (1997) Non-linear normal modes (NNMs) and their applications in vibration theory: an overview. Mech Syst Signal Process 11(1):3–22

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sauer T, Yorke JA, Casdagli M (1991) Embedology. J Stat Phys 65(3–4):579–616

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Kennel MB, Brown R, Abarbanel HD (1992) Determining embedding dimension for phase-space reconstruction using a geometrical construction. Phys Rev A 45(6):3403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Volmir AS (1974) The nonlinear dynamics of plates and shells. No FTD-HC-23-851-74. Foreign Technology DIV Wright-Patterson AFB OH

    Google Scholar 

  24. Virgin LN (2007) Vibration of axially loaded structures, 393rd edn. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1100031.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Chelidze .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Society for Experimental Mechanics, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ilbeigi, S., Chelidze, D. (2016). Model Order Reduction of Nonlinear Euler-Bernoulli Beam. In: Kerschen, G. (eds) Nonlinear Dynamics, Volume 1. Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15221-9_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15221-9_34

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15220-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15221-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics