Skip to main content

Suspended Sediment Estimation Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sediment Matters

Abstract

Forecasting of sediment concentration in rivers is a very important process for water resources assignment development and management. In this paper, a neural network approach is proposed to predict suspended sediment concentration from streamflow. A comparison was performed between artificial neural network, sediment rating-curve and multilinear regression models. It was based on a 5 years period of continuous streamflow, suspended sediment concentration and mean water temperature data of West Virginia, Little Coal River, Danville station operated by the United States Geological Survey. Based on comparison of the results, it is found that the artificial neural network model gives better estimates than the sediment rating-curve and multilinear regression techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bayazıt M, Oguz B (1998) Probability and statistics for engineers. Birsen Publishing House, Istanbul, p 159

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell FB, Bauder HA (1940) A rating-curve method for determining silt discharge of streams. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 21:603–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chibanga R, Berlamont J, Vandewalle J (2003) Modelling and forecasting of hydrological variables using artificial neural networks: the Kafue River sub-basin. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):363–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK (2003) Estimation, forecasting and extrapolation of river flows by artificial neural networks. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):349–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK (2004) Estimation and forecasting of daily suspended sediment data by multi layer perceptrons. Adv Water Resour 27:185–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2005) Flow prediction by three back propagation techniques using k-fold partitioning of neural network training data. Nordic Hydrol 36(1):49–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Cigizoglu HK, Kisi O (2006) Methods to improve the neural network performance in suspended sediment estimation. J Hydrol 317:221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirci M, Baltaci A (2012) Prediction of suspended sediment in river using fuzzy logic and multilinear regression approaches. Neural Comput Appl doi:10.1007/s00521-012-1280-z

  • Hundecha Y, Bardossy A, Theisen HW (2001) Development of a fuzzy logic based rainfall-runoff model. Hydrol Sci J 46(3):363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain SK, Das D, Srivastava DK (1999) Application of ANN for reservoir inflow prediction and operation. J Water Resour Plan Manage ASCE 125(5):263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippman R (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag 4:4–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohani AK, Goel NK, Bhatia KKS (2007) Deriving stage–discharge–sediment concentration relationships using fuzzy logic. Hydrol Sci J 52(4):793–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopes VL, Ffolliott PF (1993) Sediment rating curves for a clearcut ponderosa pine watershed in northern Arizona. Water Resour Bull 29(3):369–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBean EA, Al-Nassri S (1988) Uncertainty in suspended sediment transport curves. J Hydraul Eng ASCE 114(1):63–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2004a) River flow modeling using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 9(1):60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2004b) Daily suspended sediment modeling using a fuzzy-differential evolution approach. Hydrol Sci J 49(1):183–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2004c) Multi-layer perceptrons with Levenberg-Marquardt optimization algorithm for suspended sediment concentration prediction and estimation. Hydrol Sci J 49(6):1025–1040

    Google Scholar 

  • Kisi O (2005) Suspended sediment estimation using neuro-fuzzy and neural network approaches. Hydrol Sci J 50(4):683–696

    Google Scholar 

  • Piest RF, Miller CR (1975) Sediment yields and sediment sources. In: Vanoni VA (ed) Sedimentation Engineering. ASCE, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman H, Sunilkumar N (1995) Multivariate modelling of water resources time series using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Sci J 40(2):145–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE, Hinton GE, Williams RJ (1986) Learning internal representation by error propagation. In: Rumelhart DE, McClelland JL (ed) Inf: Parallel Distributed Processing, vol 1, Foundations. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Saad M, Bigras P, Turgeon A, Duquette R (1996) Fuzzy learning decomposition for the scheduling of hydroelectric power systems. Water Resour Res 32(1):179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomatine DP, Dulal KN (2003) Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall–runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 48(3):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2002) A data-driven algorithm for constructing artificial neural network rainfall–runoff models. Hydrol Processes 16:1325–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur G (2002) Artificial neural networks for sheet sediment transport. Hydrol Sci J 47(6):879–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tayfur G, Ozdemir S, Singh VP (2003) Fuzzy logic algorithm for runoff-induced sediment transport from bare soil surfaces. Adv Water Resour 26:1249–1256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toprak ZF, Cigizoglu HK (2008) Predicting longitudinal dispersion coefficient in natural streams by artificial intelligence methods. Hydrol Process 22:4106–4129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Üneş F (2010a) Prediction of density flow plunging depth in dam reservoir: an artificial neural network approach. Clean-Soil Air Water 38(3):296–308

    Google Scholar 

  • Üneş F (2010b) Dam reservoir level modeling by neural network approach: a case study. Neural Netw World 4(10):461–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilby RL, Abrahart RJ, Dawson CW (2003) Detection of conceptual model rainfall–runoff processes inside an artificial neural network. Hydrol Sci J 48(2):163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zealand CM, Burn DH, Simonovic SP (1999) Short term stream flow forecasting using artificial neural networks. J Hydrol 214:32–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The data used in this study were downloaded from the web server of the USGS. The author wishes to thank the staff of the USGS who are associated with data observation, processing, and management of USGS Web sites.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mustafa Demirci .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Demirci, M., Üneş, F., Saydemir, S. (2015). Suspended Sediment Estimation Using an Artificial Intelligence Approach. In: Heininger, P., Cullmann, J. (eds) Sediment Matters. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14696-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics