Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Movement Analysis of Scull and Oar Rowing

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Human Motion

Abstract

Rowing coaches ask “What is an ideal rowing technique?” and “How can biomechanics help me improve technique in my rower?”. This chapter discusses biomechanical variables that have been shown to help predict boat velocity, and how biomechanists can provide profiling of body kinematics (joint angles, segment velocities and segmental sequencing, drive to recovery ratios) and forces (handle, pin/oar, and feet). Rower movement has traditionally been assessed on ergometers using power output and two-dimensional high-speed video or optoelectronic systems to provide joint angles and segment velocities. Advances in technology have seen the use of three-dimensional video, force plates at the foot-stretchers, strain gauges at the pins and oars, pressure sensors at the seat and feet, electromyography, computer simulations/modelling, inertial sensors, and instrumented rowing boats (i.e., pitch, yaw, roll, velocity), for rowing technique analyses. The greater use of customized telemetered sensors on the rowing skiff can assist the coach and biomechanist with judging when performance (skiff velocity) improves with a training intervention. Biomechanical variables can be measured and feedback presented in real-time on-water. Proper proximal to distal sequencing of joint rotations is important in the production of high power output in rowing technique. The biomechanist must be able to measure rowing performance technique and outcome variables reliably and with accuracy/sensitivity, so feedback can be given to rowers and coaches on what needs to be the focus of technique improvement. This chapter focuses on how biomechanics technologies are applied to improve performance and help prevent injury in rowing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Affeld K, Schichl K, Ziemann A (1993) Assessment of rowing efficiency. Int J Sports Med 14(Suppl 1):S39–S41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson R, Harrison AJ, Lyons GM (2005) Accelerometry-based feedback – can it improve movement consistency and performance in rowing? Sports Biomech 4:179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baird D, Soroka WW (1951) Measurement of force-time relations in racing skills. Am Soc Mech Eng 58:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett RS, Manning JM (2004) Relationships between rigging set-up, anthropometry, physical capacity, rowing kinematics and rowing performance. Sports Biomech 3:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudouin A, Hawkins D (2004) Investigation of biomechanical factors affecting rowing performance. J Biomech 37(7):969–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson A, Abendroth J, King D, Swensen T (2011) Comparison of rowing on a Concept 2 stationary and dynamic ergometer. J Sports Sci Med 10(2):267–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingul BM, Bulgan C, Aydin M, Buyukdemirtas T, Ozbek A (2014) Two-dimensional kinematic analysis of catch and finish positions during a 2000 m rowing ergometer time trial. South Afr J Res Sport Phys Educ Recreation 36(3):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Bompa TO (1980) Technique and muscle force. Can J Appl Sport Sci 5(4):245–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck DP, Smith R, Sinclair PJ (2000) Dynamic characterisation of Concept II and Rowperfect ergometer rowing. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Australiasian biomechanics conference 3, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge EM, Bull AMJ, McGregor AH (2014) Foot force production and asymmetries in elite rowers. Sports Biomech 13(1):47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckeridge EM, Bull AMJ, McGregor AH (2015) Biomechanical determinants of elite rowing technique and performance. Scand J Med Sci Sports 25(2):e176–e183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coker J (2010) Using a boat instrumentation system to measure and improve elite rowing technique and set-up for on-water rowing performance. PhD Dissertation. AUT University, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker J, Hume PA, Nolte V (2008) Evaluating rowing force profiles: implications from literature. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the New Zealand sports medicine and science conference, Dunedin

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker J, HumePA, Nolte V (2009) Validity of the powerline boat instrumentation system. In: Harrison D, Anderson R, Kenny I (Chair) Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 27th international conference of biomechanics in sports, Limerick, Ireland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dal Monte A, Komor A (1989) Rowing and sculling mechanics. In: Vaughan CL (ed) Biomechanics of Sport. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 53–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson RG, Lockwook RJ, Wilson JD, Freeman G (1998) The rowing cycle: sources of variance and invariance in ergometer and on-the-water performance. J Mot Behav 33(1):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle MM, Lyttle AD, Elliott BC (2010) Comparison of force-related performance indicators between heavyweight and lightweight rowers. Sports Biomech 9(3):178–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliott BC, Lyttle AD, Birkett O (2002) The RowPerfect ergometer: a training aid for on-water single scull rowing. J Sports Biomech 1(2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fohanno V, Nordez A, Smith RM, Colloud F (2015) Asymmetry in elite rowers: effect of ergometer design and stroke rate. Sports Biomech 14(3):310–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene AJ, Sinclair PJ, Dickson MH, Colloud F, Smith RM (2013) The effect of ergometer design on rowing stroke mechanics. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23(4):468–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday SE, Zavatsky AB, Andrews BJ, Hase K (2001) Kinematics of the upper and lower extremities in three-dimensions during ergometer rowing. In: Muller R, Gerber H, Stacoff A (Chair) Symposium conducted at the meeting of the international society of biomechanics, Interrepro AG, Zurich, Switzerland, 8–13 July

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann U, Mader A, Wasser K, Klauer I (1993) Peak force, velocity, and power during five and ten maximal rowing ergometer strokes by world class female and male rowers. Int J Sports Med 14(Suppl 1):S42–S45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins D (2000) A new instrumentation system for training rowers. J Biomech 33:241–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herberger E, Klavora P (1985) Rigging: part two. Foot stretcher adjustment. Rowing 28(307):ISSN: 0035–8584

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill H (2002) Dynamics of coordination within elite rowing crews: evidence from force pattern analysis. J Sports Sci 20(2):101–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill H, Fahrig S (2009) The impact of fluctuations in boat velocity during the rowing cycle on race time. Scand J Med Sci Sports 19(4):585–594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume PA, Soper CS (2001) Segmental sequencing reports (Athlete report). Auckland University of Technology, Auckland

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume PA, Soper CS, Joe G, Williams T, Aitchison D, Gunn S (2000) Effects of foot-stretcher angle on the drive phase in ergometer rowing. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the sports medicine Australia, Book of abstracts: 2000 Pre-Olympic congress: international congress on sport science, sports medicine and physical education, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume PA, Reid DA, Benschop A (2001) Back injury in rowing – the effectiveness of the Glasstron goggles as a coaching tool in changing pelvis angle: a pilot study. Sport Science New Zealand. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the developing sport – the next steps: conference 2001, Wellington, New Zealand

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume PA, Soper CS, Zeinstra J (2003) The effectiveness of visual feedback on changing rowing technique. NZ Coach 11(4):22–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume PA, Soper CS, Reid D, Tong R (2005a) Foot-stretcher angle does affect rowing ergometer performance. Successful Coach UK 21(April):4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hume PA, Soper CS, Zeinstra J (2005b) Visual feedback to change rowing technique. Successful Coach UK 19(February):7–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshnev V (2002) Oar inertia force. Different catch and release angles in stroke and bow seats of a pair. Rowing Biomech Newsl 2(4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshnev V (2006) Why is a long catch not a waste of energy; Why is a front loaded drive more efficient? Rowing Biomech Newsl 6(63)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshnev V (2007a) Catch and release slips expressed in video frames; Plotting force curve relative time or oar angle. Rowing Biomech Newsl 7(75)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshnev V (2007b) Using the elastic energy of the oar shaft. Rowing Biomech Newsl 7(80)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshnev V, Baker T (2007) Understanding rowing technique. The timing of the catch. Rowing and Regatta

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleshnev V, Kleshnev I (1998) Dependence of rowing performance and efficiency on motor coordination of the main body segments. J Sports Sci 16(5):418–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Korndle H, Lippens V (1988) Do rowers have a particular “footwriting”? In Biomechanics in Sport (266502, pp 7–11). Institution of Mechanical Engineers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamb DH (1989) A kinematic comparison of ergometer and on-water rowing. Am J Sports Med 17(3):367–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li C, Ho W, Lin H (2007) Strength curve characteristics of rowing performance from the water and the land. J Biomech 40(Suppl 2):S770

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loschner C, Smith R (2000) The relationship between pin forces and individual feet forces applied during sculling. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 3rd Australasian biomechanics conference, Griffith University, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Loschner C, Smith R, Galloway M (2000) Intra-stroke boat orientation during single sculling. In: Hong Y, Johns D (Chair). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the XVIIIth international symposium on biomechanics in sports, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 25–30 June

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarlane DJ, Edmond IM, Walmsley A (1997) Instrumentation of an ergometer to monitor the reliability of rowing performance. J Sports Sci 15(2):167–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macrossan MN, Macrossan NW (2006) Back-splash in rowing-shell propulsion. University of Queensland, Brisbane

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Manning JM, Osbourne M, Hume PA (2001). Video analysis of the rowing stroke: segmental interaction biomechanics. NZ Rowing Mag, February

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TP, Bernfield YS (1980) Effect of stroke rate on velocity of a rowing shell. Med Sci Sports Exerc 12(4):250–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Martindale WO, Robertson DGE (1984) Mechanical energy in sculling and in rowing an ergometer. Can J Appl Sport Sci 9:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason BR, Shakespear PB, Doherty P (1988) The use of biomechanical analysis in rowing to monitor the effect of training. Excel 4(4):7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattes K, Schaffert N (2010) New measuring and on water coaching device for rowing. J Hum Sport Exerc 5(2):226–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBride ME (1998) The role of individual and crew technique in the optimisation of boat velocity in rowing. PhD Dissertation. University of Western Australia, Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • McBride ME, Elliott BC (1999) Use of real-time telemetry to monitor instantaneous seat and boat velocity in pair oared rowing. In: Sanders RH, Gibson BJ (Chair) Symposium conducted at the meeting of the XVIIth international symposium on biomechanics in sports, School of Biomedical and Sports Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell LK, Hume PA, Nolte V (2011) Rib stress fractures among rowers: definition, epidemiology, mechanisms, risk factors and effectiveness of injury prevention strategies. Sports Med 41(11):883–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar SK, Oldham RH, Hume PA, Renshaw I (2015) Using rowers’ perceptions of on-water stroke success to evaluate sculling catch efficiency variables via a boat instrumentation system. Sports 3(4):335–345. https://doi.org/10.3390/sports3040335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millar SK, Hume PA, McDonnell L (2016) Does a modified foot-stretcher improve 500-m on-water and ergometer rowing performance time and comfort? Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 34th international society of biomechanics in sports, Tsukuba, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Millward A (1987) A study of the forces exerted by an oarsman and the effect on boat speed. J Sports Sci 5(2):93–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi B, Lee-Eng J, Wrobel JS, Goebel R (2015) Estimation of center of mass trajectory using wearable sensors during golf swing. J Sports Sci Med 14(2):354–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson WN, Widule CJ (1983) Kinematic analysis and efficiency estimate of intercollegiate female rowers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15(6):535–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolte V (1991) Introduction to the biomechanics of rowing. FISA Coach 2(1):1–6

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nolte V, Morrow A (2002, Winter) Coach boat view. Biomechanics of rowing. Rowing Canada Aviron

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogurkowska M, Kawalek K, Zygmanska M (2015) Biomechanical characteristics of rowing. Trends Sport Sci 22(2):61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Peltonen J, Rusko H (1993) Interrelations between power, force production and energy metabolism in maximal leg work using a modified rowing ergometer. J Sports Sci 11(3):233–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelz PF, Vergé A (2014) Validated biomechanical model for efficiency and speed of rowing. J Biomech 47(13):3415–3422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid D, McNair P (2000) Factors contributing to low back pain in rowers. Br J Sports Med 34(5):321–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth W, Schwanitz P, Pas P, Bauer P (1993) Force-time characteristics of the rowing stroke and corresponding physiological muscle adaptations. Int J Sports Med 14(Suppl 1):S32–S34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan-Tanner R, Hahn A, Lawton E, Bellenger S, Kearns A (1999) A comparison of “performance” during on-water racing and ergometer rowing. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 5th IOC world congress on sport sciences, Sports Medicine Australia, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanderson B, Martindale W (1986) Towards optimizing rowing technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc 18(4):454–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabort EJ, Hawley JA, Hopkins W, Blum H (1999) High reliability of performance of well-trained rowers on a rowing ergometer. J Sports Sci 17(8):627–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffert N, Mattes K (2015) Effects of acoustic feedback training in elite-standard Para-Rowing. J Sports Sci 33(4):411–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Draper C (2002) Quantitative characteristic of coxless pair-oar rowing. In: Gianikellis KE (Chair) Symposium conducted at the meeting of the XXth international symposium on biomechanics in sports, Universidad de Extremadura. Servicio de Publicaciones, Caceres, Spain

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Draper C (2006) Skill variables discriminate between the elite and sub-elite in coxless pair oared rowing. In: International Society of Biomechanics in Sports, Proceedings of XXIV international symposium on biomechanics in sports 2006 (pp. 343–346), University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Loschner C (2002) Biomechanics feedback for rowing. J Sports Sci 20(10):783–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Spinks WL (1995) Discriminant analysis of biomechanical differences between novice, good and elite rowers. J Sports Sci 13(5):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith R, Spinks WL (1998) A system for the biomechanical assessment of rowing performance (Rowsys). J Hum Mov Stud 34:141–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoljanovic T, Bojanic I, Hannafin JA, Hren D, Delimar D, Pecina M (2009) Traumatic and overuse injuries among international elite junior rowers. Am J Sports Med 37(6):1193–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper CS, Hume PA (2004a) Reliability of power output during rowing changes with ergometer type and race distance. Sport Biomech 3(2):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper CS, Hume PA (2004b) Towards an ideal rowing technique for performance: the contributions from biomechanics. Sports Med 34(9):825–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soper CS, Hume PA, Reid D, Tonks R (2002) The effectiveness of the Goggle Training System as a coaching tool in changing pelvis angle at the catch during on-water rowing. In: Gianikellis KE (Chair) Symposium conducted at the meeting of the XXth international symposium on biomechanics in sports, Universidad de Extremadura, Servicio de Publicaciones, Caceres, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soper CS, Hume PA, Tonks D (2005) What is an ideal rowing technique? How can biomechanics help? NZ Rowing Magaz

    Google Scholar 

  • Spinks WL (1996) Force-angle profile analysis in rowing. J Hum Mov Stud 31(5):211–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallard M (1999) The challenge of rowers backache. Sport Medicine Today 1(2):53–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Moreno R, Tanaka C, Penney KL (1999) Joint excursion, handle velocity, and applied force: a biomechanical analysis of ergonometric rowing. Int J Sports Med 21(1):41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson F, Gissane C, Simms C, Gormley J (2008) A 12 month prospective cohort study of injury in international rowers. Br Med J 44:207–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wing AM, Woodburn C (1995) The coordination and consistency of rowers in a racing eight. J Sports Sci 13(3):187–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zatsiorsky VM, Yakunin N (1991) Mechanics and biomechanics of rowing: a review. Int J Sport Biomech 7:229–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks are given to Dr. Clara Soper for providing Fig. 1 from her Sports Medicine paper that I adapted for this text book. Thanks are given to Dr. Sarah Kate Millar for getting photos taken of herself on ergometers and on-water for Fig. 2. Thanks are given to Dr. Jennie Coker for providing Fig. 3 on pin force profiles contributed from her PhD thesis (Coker 2010) toward this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

    Patria A. Hume

Authors
  1. Patria A. Hume
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patria A. Hume .

Section Editor information

  1. Institut for Biomechanics und Orthopedic, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany

    Gert-Peter Brüggemann

  2. Department of Computer Science, University of Houston, Houston, Texas, USA

    Zhigang Deng

  3. McIntosh Consultancy and Research, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

    Andrew S. McIntosh

  4. Wilmington, Delaware, USA

    Freeman Miller

  5. C-Motion Inc., Germantown, USA

    W. Scott Selbie

  6. Institute of Biomechanics and Orthopaedics, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, 50933, Köln, Germany

    Gert-Peter Brüggemann

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hume, P.A. (2018). Movement Analysis of Scull and Oar Rowing. In: Handbook of Human Motion. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14418-4_133

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation