Skip to main content

Ambient Light

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Visual Display Technology

Abstract

When using displays outside darkrooms, ambient light is reflected from the display surface and can interfere with the viewer’s perception of the light emitted from the display. In consequence, this reduces the image quality. In this chapter, the major reflection types, measurement procedures, and examples of the effects of ambient light on Contrast Ratio, gray scale, and color reproduction are described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AG:

Antiglare

AM:

Active matrix

AR:

Antireflection

BRDF:

Bidirectional reflectance distribution function

CIE:

Commission international déclairage

CR:

Contrast ratio

CRT:

Cathode ray tube

FOV:

Field of view

ISO:

International organization for standardization

JND:

Just noticeable difference

LCD:

Liquid crystal display

LED:

Light-emitting diode

OLED:

Organic light-emitting diode

PDP:

Plasma panel display

Further Reading

  • American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM E1392-96 (1997) Standard practice for angle resolved optical scatter measurements on specular or diffuse surfaces. www.astm.org

  • Anderson S, Pompea SM, Shepard DF, Castonguay R (1988) Performance of a fully automated scatterometer for BRDF and BTDF measurements at visible and infrared wavelengths. SPIE 967:159–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Boynton PA, Kelley EF (2001) Compensation for stray light in projection display metrology. SID 01 Digest 32(1):334–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Yan Y, Westenberg E, Niebauer D, Sakaitani N, Chaudhuri RS, Sato Y, Takamatsu M (2002) Development of anti-reflection (AR) coating on plastic panels for display applications. J Sol Gel Sci Technol 19:77–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman HS (1947) Stray light in optical systems. J Opt Soc Am 37:434–451

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commission International de l’Éclairage, CIE 44 (1979) Absolute methods for reflection measurement. www.cie.co.at

  • da Silva Filho PN, Epiphanio JCN (1993) Influence of irradiance on bidirectional reflectance factor measurements. Int Soc Opt Eng 1938:232–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng X, Schott JR, Gallagher T (1993) Comparison of methods for generation of absolute reflectance-factor values for bidirectional reflectance-distribution function studies. Appl Optics 32(7):1234–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesha Shanbhogue H, Nagendra CL, Annapurna MN, Ajith Kumar S, Thutupalli GKM (1997) Multilayer antireflection coatings for the visible and near-infrared regions. Appl Optics 36(25):6339–6351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginneken B, van Stavridi M, Koenderink JJ (1998) Diffuse and specular reflection from rough surfaces. Appl Optics 37(1):130–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He XD, Torrance KE, Sillion FX, Greenberg DP (1991) A comprehensive physical model for light reflection. Comput Graph 25(4):175–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hecht E (2002) Optics, chapter 4: the propagation of light. Addison Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiller JA, Mendelsohn JD, Rubner MF (2000) Reversibly erasable nanoporous anti-reflection coatings from polyelectrolyte multilayers. Nat Mater 1:59–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt RWG (1998) Chapter 5.8 geometries of illumination and viewing. In: Measuring colour. Fountain Press, Kingston Upon Thames

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones G, Kelley E, Germer T (1996) Specular and diffuse reflection measurements of electronic displays. SID 96 Digest 27(1):203–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley EF (2002) Sensitivity of display reflection measurements to apparatus geometry. SID 02 Digest 33:140–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelley EF, Jones GR (1997) Utilizing the bidirectional reflectance distribution function to predict reflections from FPDs. SID 97 Digest 28:831–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley EF, Jones GR, Germer TA (1998a) The three components of reflection. SID 98 Digest 14(10):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley EF, Jones GR, Germer TA (1998b) Display reflectance model based on the BRDF. SID 98 Digest 19:27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley EF, Lindfors M, Penczek J (2006) Display daylight ambient contrast measurement methods and daylight readability. SID 06 Digest 14(11):1019–1030

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim S, Kelley EF, Penczek J (2009) Robustness of display reflectance measurements: comparison between BRDF and hemispherical diffuse reflectance. SID 09 Digest 40(1):325–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubota S (1994) Measurement of specular reflectance of LCDs. Proc Int Symp Illum Eng Soc Jpn 7:241–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettieri TR, Marx E, Song J-F, Vorburge TV (1991) Light scattering from glossy coatings on paper. Appl Optics 30(30):4439–4447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacAdam DL (1942) Visual sensitivities to color differences in daylight. J Opt Soc Am 32:247–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCluney WR (1994) Introduction to radiometry and photometry. Artech House, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Nayar SK, Oren M (1995) Visual appearance of matte surfaces. Science 267:1153–1156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicodemus FE (1970) Reflectance nomenclature and directional reflectance and emissivity. Appl Optics 9(6):1474–1475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuijs AM, Horikx JJL (1994) Diffraction and scattering at antiglare structures for display devices. Appl Optics 33(18):4058–4060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Rostenberg B (1999) Redesigning the PACS reading room: optimizing monitor and room lighting. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng 3662:276–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Stover JC (1995) Optical scattering: measurement and analysis. SPIE Optical Engineering Press, Washington, DC, pp 139–143

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tominaga S, Wandell BA (1989) The standard surface reflectance model and illuminant estimation. J Opt Soc Am 6(4):576–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torrance KE, Sparrow EM (1967) Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces. J Opt Soc Am 57(9):1105–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traeger F (2007) Handbook of lasers and optics, chapter “thin film optical coatings”. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Völz HG (1995) Industrial color testing. Fundamentals and techniques. Reflection and transmission measurement. VCH, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang AH, Kuo HT (2009) Effects of ambient illumination on users’ visual performance using various electronic displays. J Soc Inf Disp 17(8):665–669

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karlheinz Blankenbach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Blankenbach, K. (2016). Ambient Light. In: Chen, J., Cranton, W., Fihn, M. (eds) Handbook of Visual Display Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14346-0_148

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics