Skip to main content

Mechanics in Renaissance Science

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Abstract

The modern science of mechanics – a mathematical discipline – appeared during the sixteenth century at the crossroads of the increasing transformation of the mechanical arts and the humanist recovery of ancient and medieval textual traditions. Unlike other mixed-mathematical sciences such as astronomy and optics extensively developed during the medieval Latin West, the science of mechanics did not have clear medieval precedents. Consequently, intense debates and controversies forged mechanics as a mathematical science by borrowing elements from conflicting textual traditions, the expansion and transformation of the mechanical arts, the reconfiguration of disciplinary boundaries in mathematics and natural philosophy, and the possibility of incorporating this science of machines into existing taxonomies of knowledge – including their institutions (monasteries, universities, courts). By the sixteenth century, the science of mechanics was often portrayed as formulating the mathematical principles of the design and construction of machines, thereby dealing with artificial objects whose operation run against natural order to satisfy human needs. Mechanics was therefore seen as compatible with Aristotelian divisions of sciences. However, by the second half of the seventeenth century, the vast expansion of mechanics had reached themes and problems considered for centuries as territory of natural philosophy, particularly the motion of bodies whose explanation then became increasingly intertwined with emerging mathematical techniques – from infinitesimals to calculus. Mechanics then acquired a more general dimension as a mathematical science of motion. During the seventeenth, the codification and adaptation of mechanics into a mathematical science of motion provided materials for and stimulus to new cosmologies which attempted to replace Scholastic natural philosophies and naturalistic cosmologies of the Renaissance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,399.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,599.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aristotle. 1936. Mechanical problems. In Minor works. Trans W. S. Hett, Vol. 14, 330–411. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, Jim. 2006. The mechanical arts. In The Cambridge history of science: Early modern science, ed. K. Park and L. Daston, 673–695. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 1992. Guidobaldo Dal Monte and the Archimedean revival. Nuncius 7: 3–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertoloni Meli, Domenico. 2006. Thinking with objects: The transformation of mechanics in the seventeenth century. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biagioli, Mario. 1993. Galileo courtier. The practice of science in the culture of absolutism. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Clagett, Marshall. 1959. The science of mechanics in the middle ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clagett, Marshall. 1964. Archimedes in the Middle Ages. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, Stillman, and I. E. Drabkin. 1969. Mechanics in Sixteenth-Century Italy; Selections from Tartaglia, Benedetti, Guido Ubaldo, & Galileo. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldhay, Rivka. 2018. Preclassical mechanics in context: Practical and theoretical knowledge between sovereignty, religion, and science. In Emergence and expansion of preclassical mechanics, ed. Jürgen Renn et al., 29–53. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1898. Le Opere Di Galileo Galilei, ed. Antonio Favaro, vol. viii. Firenze: G. Barbera.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo. 1960. On motion and on mechanics. Comprising De Motu and Le Meccaniche. Trans I. E. Drabkin and Stillman Drake. Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galluzzi, Paolo. 1996. Renaissance engineers from Brunelleschi to Leonardo da Vinci. Florence: Giunti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, Walter R. 1986. The scope of renaissance mechanics. Osiris 2: 43–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, Walter R. 2001. Renaissance mechanics and the new science of Motio’. In Largo campo di filosofare, ed. Carlos Solís and José Montesinos, 255–267. La Orotava: Fundación Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, Walter R., and Sophie Roux. 2008. Mechanics and natural philosophy before the scientific revolution. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Moody, Ernest A., and Marshall Clagett. 1952. The medieval science of weights. Madisson: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdoch, John E., and Edith Sylla. 1978. The science of motion. In Science in the middle ages, ed. David Lindberg, 206–264. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Navarro-Brotons, Víctor. 2008. Mechanics in Spain at the end of the 16th century and the Madrid Academy of Mathematics. In Mechanics and natural philosophy before the scientific revolution, ed. Walter R. Laird and Sophie Roux, 239–257. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, Paolo. 2008. Breaking the circle: The emergence of Archimedean mechanics in the late renaissance. Archive for History of Exact Sciences 62: 301–346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pisano, Raffaele, and Danilo Capecchi. 2016. Tartaglia’s science of weights and mechanics in the sixteenth century. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, Brian. 1994. Print culture in renaissance Italy: The editor and the vernacular text, 1470–1600. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Paul. 1975. The Italian renaissance of mathematics. Genève: Librarie Droz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, Paul Lawrence, and Stillman Drake. 1971. The Pseudo-Aristotelian questions of mechanics in renaissance culture. Studies in the Renaissance 18: 65–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roux, Sophie, and Edigio Festa. 2008. The Engima of the Inclined Plane from Heron to Galileo. In Mechanics and Natural Philosophy before the Scientific Revolution, edited by Sophie Roux and W. R. Laird, 195–220. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiefsky, Mark. 2009. Structures of argument and concepts of force in the Aristotelian mechanical problems. Early Science and Medicine 14: 43–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea, William. 1977. Galileo’s intellectual revolution. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valleriani, Matteo. 2009. The transformation of Aristotle’s mechanical questions: A bridge between the Italian renaissance architects and Galileo’s First New Science. Annals of Science 66: 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valleriani, Matteo. 2010. Galileo engineer. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, J. 2016. The Aristotelian mechanics: Text and diagrams. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, Jessica. 2004. Humanism, machinery and renaissance literature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio H. Orozco-Echeverri .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Orozco-Echeverri, S.H. (2022). Mechanics in Renaissance Science. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14169-5_947

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics