Skip to main content

Surgery for Female Urinary Incontinence

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Prosthetic Surgery in Urology

Abstract

Urinary incontinence, the complaint of involuntary leakage of urine, may affect up to 50 % of women at some point in their lifetime. Incontinence negatively impacts psychological health and women who live with incontinence have a significantly lower quality of life compared to continent women. The surgical options available to treat urinary incontinence are extensive and have evolved significantly over the years. This chapter focuses on those techniques used to treat incontinence that involve the use of prosthetics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardization sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn. 2002;21(12):167–78.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Largo-Janssen T, Smits A, Van Weel C. Urinary incontinence in women and the effects on their lives. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;10:211–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Nilsson M, Lalos A, Lalos O. The impact of female urinary incontinence and urgency on quality of life and partner relationship. Neurourol Urodyn. 2009;28:976–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shaw C. A review of the psychosocial predictors of help seeking behaviour and impact on quality of life in people with urinary incontinence. J Clin Nurs. 2001;10:15–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. El-Gamal O, Soliman M, Tawfik A, Abdel RA. Use of autologous rectus fascia in a new transobturator hybrid sling for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: a pilot study. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2013;47(1):57–62.

    Google Scholar 

  6. McGuire E, Lytton B. Pubovaginal sling procedure for stress incontinence. BJU Int. 1978;119(1):82–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Azab A, El-Nashar S. Midurethral slings versus the standard pubovaginal slings for women with neurogenic stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2015;26(3):427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Milose J, Sharp K, He C, Stoffel J, Clemens J, Cameron A. Success of autologous pubovaginal sling after failed synthetic mid urethral sling. J Urol. 2015;193(3):916–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker W, Gomelsky A, Padmanabhan P. Autologous fascia pubovaginal slings after prior synthetic anti-incontinence procedures for recurrent incontinence: a multi-institutional prospective comparative analysis to de novo autologous slings assessing objective and subjective cure. Neurourol Urodyn. 2015. doi:10.1002/nau.22759.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Webster T, Gerridzen R. Urethral erosion following autologous rectus fascial pubovaginal sling. Can J Urol. 2003;10(6):2068–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Amundsen CL, Flynn B, Webster G. Urethral erosion after synthetic and nonsynthetic pubovaginal slings: differences in management and continence outcome. J Urol. 2003;170(1):134–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rehman H, Bezerra C, Bruschini H, Cody J. Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;19(1):CD001754.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Albo M, Richter H, Brubaker L, Norton P, Kraus SR, Zimmern PE, et al. Burch colposuspension versus fascial sling to reduce urinary stress incontinence. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2007;356(21):2143–55. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18074439.

  14. Petros PE, Ulmsten UI. An integral theory of female urinary incontinence. Experimental and clinical considerations. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl [Internet]. 1990 [Cited 3 Oct 2011];153:7–31. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2093278.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ulmsten U, Petros P. Intravaginal slingplasty (IVS): an ambulatory surgical procedure for treatment of female urinary incontinence. Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995;29(1):75–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogah J, Cody J, Rogerson L. Minimally invasive synthetic suburethral sling operations for stress urinary incontinence in women. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2009;7(4):CD006375.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Delorme E, Droupy S, de Tayrac R, Delmas V. Transobturator tape (Uratape): a new minimally-invasive procedure to treat female urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2004;45(2):203–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Richter H, Albo M, Zyczynski HM, Kenton K, Norton PA, Sirls LT, et al. Retropubic versus transobturator midurethral slings for stress incontinence. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(22):2066–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lucas M, Bosch R, Burkhard F, Cruz F, Madden T, Nambiar A, et al. EAU guidelines on surgical treatment of urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2012;62(6):1118–29.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nilsson C, Palval K, Aarnio R, Morcos E, Falconer C. Seventeen years’ follow-up of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(8):1265–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Yonguc T, Gunlusoy B, Degirmenci T, Kozacioglu Z, Bozkurt I, Arsian B, et al. Are the outcomes of transobturator tape procedure for female stress urinary incontinence durable in long-term follow-up? Int Urol Nephrol. 2014;46(7):1295–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Athanasiou S, Grigoriadis T, Zacharakis D, Skampardonis N, Lourantou D, Antsaklis A. Seven years of objective and subjective outcomes of transobturator (TVT-O) vaginal tape: why do tapes fail? Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25(2):219–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Jha S, Radley S, Farkas A, Jones G. The impact of TVT on sexual function. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2009;20(2):165–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. De Souza A, Dwyer P, Rosamilia A, Hiscock R, Lim Y, Murray C, et al. Sexual function following retropubic TVT and transobturator Monarc sling in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency: a multicentre prospective study. Int Urogynecol J. 2012;23(2):153–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Filocamo M, Serati M, Frumenzio E, Li Marzi V, Cattoni E, Champagne A, et al. The impact of mid-urethral slings for the treatment of urodynamic stress incontinence on female sexual function: a multicenter prospective study. J Sex Med. 2011;8(7):2002–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. Eur Assoc Urol. 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Meschia M, Pifarotti P, Bernasconi F, Guercio E, Maffiolini M, Magatti F, et al. Tension-freevaginaltape: analysis of outcomes and complications in 404 stress incontinent women. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2001;12 Suppl 2:S24–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Karram M, Segal J, Vassallo B, Kleeman S. Complications and untoward effects of the tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;101(5 Pt 1):929–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Latthe P, Foon R, Toozs-Hobson P. Transobturator and retropubic tape procedures in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. BJOG. 2007;114:522–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Giberti C, Gallo F, Cortese P, Schenone M. Transobturator tape for treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: objective and subjective results after a mean follow-up of two years. Urology. 2007;69:703–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Juang C, Yu K, Chou P, Yen M, Twu N, Horng H, et al. Efficacy analysis of trans-obturator tension-free vaginal tape (TVT-O) plus modified Ingelman- Sundberg procedure versus TVT-O alone in the treatment of mixed urinary incontinence: a randomized study. Eur Urol. 2007;51(6):1671–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Agency PR. Medicines and healthcare summaries of the safety/adverse effects of vaginal tapes/slings/meshes for. 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  33. http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/ProductsandMedicalProcedures/ImplantsandProsthetics/UroGynSurgicalMesh/ucm284109.htm.

  34. Kobashi K, Govier F. Management of vaginal erosion of polypropylene mesh slings. J Urol. 2003;169(6):2242–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kim S, Park J, Kim H, Park C, Kim S, Sung G, et al. Vaginal mucosal flap as a sling preservation for the treatment of vaginal exposure of mesh. Korean J Urol. 2010;51(6):416–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Giri S, Sil D, Narasimhulu G, Flood H, Skehan M, Drumm J. Management of vaginal extrusion after tension-free vaginal tape procedure for urodynamic stress incontinence. Urology. 2007;69(6):1077–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Khanuengkitkong S, Lo T, Dass A. Delayed vaginal and urethral mesh exposure: 10 years after TVT surgery. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24(3):519–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Rashid T, Revicky V, Tincello D. Mid-urethral sling tape erosions: when is excision indicated? Unpubl Work.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mock S, Angelle J, Reynolds W, Osborn D, Dmochowski R, Gomelsky A. Contemporary comparison between retropubic midurethral sling and autologous pubovaginal sling for stress urinary incontinence after the FDA advisory notification. Urology. 2015;85(2):321–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mostafa A, Lim C, Hopper L, Madhuvrata P, Abdel-Fattah M. Single-incision mini-slings versus standard midurethral slings in surgical management of female stress urinary incontinence: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness and complications. Eur Urol. 2014;65(2):402–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Abbassian A. A new operation for insertion of the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1988;140(3):512–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Matsushita K, Chugtai B, Maschino A, Lee R, Sandhu J. International variation in artificial urinary sphincter use. Urology. 2012;80(3):667–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vayleux B, Rigaud J, Luyckx F, Karam G, Glémain P, Bouchot O, et al. Female urinary incontinence and artificial urinary sphincter: study of efficacy and risk factors for failure and complications. Eur Urol [Internet]. 2011 [Cited 28 Dec 2011];59(6):1048–53. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21420781.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Costa P, Mottet N, Rabut B, Thuret R, Ben Naoum K, Wagner L. The use of an artificial urinary sphincter in women with type III incontinence and a negative Marshall test. J Urol. 2001;165(4):1172–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Fournier G, Callerot P, Thoulouzan M, Valeri A. Perrouin-Verbe. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic implantation of artificial urinary sphincter in women with intrinsic sphincter deficiency incontinence: initial results. Urology. 2014;84(5):1094–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Biardeau X, Rizk J, Marcelli F, Flamand V. Robot-assisted laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in 11 women with urinary stress incontinence: surgical technique and initial experience. Eur Urol. 2015;67(5):937–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Trolliet S, Mandron E, Lang H, Jacqmin D, Saussine C. Laparoscopic approach for artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with severe urinary stress incontinence. Prog Urol. 2013;23(10):877–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Light J, Scott F. Management of urinary incontinence in women with the artificial urinary sphincter. J Urol. 1985;134(3):476–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Diokno A, Hollander J, Alderson T. Artificial urinary sphincter for recurrent female urinary incontinence: indications and results. J Urol. 1987;138(4):778–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Webster G, Perez L, Khoury J, Timmons S. Management of type III stress urinary incontinence using artificial urinary sphincter. Urology. 1992;39(6):499–503.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Karram M, Rosenzweig B, Bhatia N. Artificial urinary sphincter for recurrent/severe stress incontinence in women. Urogynecologic perspective. J Reprod Med. 1993;38(10):791–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Chatelain C, Richard F, Bitker M. [Artificial urinary sphincter]. [Article in French]. Bull Acad Natl Med. 1995;179(3):599–611.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Heitz M, Olianas R, Schreiter F. [Therapy of female urinary incontinence with the AMS 800 artificial sphincter. Indications, outcome, complications and risk factors]. [Article in German]. Urol A. 1997;36(5):426–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Marques Queimadelos A, Abascal Garcia R, Muruamendiaraz Fernandez V, Virseda Rodriguez J, Arano Bertran P, Fernández Fernández E, et al. [Artificial sphincter implantation in women with urinary incontinence using a combined abdomino-vaginal approach]. [Article in Spanish]. Arch Esp Urol. 1999;52(8):877–80.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Chung E, Cartmill R. 25-year experience in the outcome of artificial urinary sphincter in the treatment of female urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2010;106(11):1664–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chung E, Navaratnam A, Cartmill R. Can artificial urinary sphincter be an effective salvage option in women following failed anti-incontinence surgery? Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(3):363–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Vayleux B, Rigaud J, Branchereau J, Larue S, Karam G, Glemain P, et al. [Pelvic radiotherapy and artificial urinary sphincter in women]. [Article in French]. Prog Urol. 2012;22(9):534–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Costa P, Poinas G, Ben Naoum K, Bouzoubaa K, Wagner L, Soustelle L, et al. Long-term results of artificial urinary sphincter for women with type III stress urinary incontinence. Eur Urol. 2013;63(4):753–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Phe V, Benadiba S, Roupret M, Granger B, Richard F, Chartier-Kastler E. Long-term functional outcomes after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women with stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int. 2014;113(6):961–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Rashid BSc (Hons), FRCS (Urol) .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rashid, T., Pearce, I. (2016). Surgery for Female Urinary Incontinence. In: Muneer, A., Pearce, I., Ralph, D. (eds) Prosthetic Surgery in Urology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13859-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13859-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13858-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13859-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics