Abstract
Interest has been revived in the creation of a “bill of rights” for Internet users. This paper analyzes users’ rights into ten broad principles, as a basis for assessing what users regard as important and for comparing different multi-issue Internet policy proposals. Stability of the principles is demonstrated in an experimental survey, which also shows that freedoms of users to participate in the design and coding of platforms appear to be viewed as inessential relative to other rights. An analysis of users’ rights frameworks that have emerged over the past twenty years also shows that such proposals tend to leave out freedoms related to software platforms, as opposed to user data or public networks. Evaluating policy frameworks in a comparative analysis based on prior principles may help people to see what is missing and what is important as the future of the Internet continues to be debated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Amazon Mechanical Turk, http://www.mturk.com
Cerf, V.: The Right to Connect and Internet Censorship. New Perspectives Quarterly 29(2), 18–23 (2012)
Clark, J.: Internet Users Bill of Rights: DOA. The Data Center Journal (March 13, 2014), http://www.datacenterjournal.com/it/internet-users-bill-rights-doa/
Connolly, F.W.: Who Are Electronic Learners? Why Should We Worry About Them? Change 26(2), 39–41 (1994)
Connolly, F., Gilbert, S.W., Lyman, P.: A Bill of Rights for Electronic Citizens. OTA, Washington, DC (1990)
Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org
Curtis, R.: A Software User’s Bill of Rights - Draft 1, http://www.princeton.edu/~rcurtis/softrights.html
Data Portability Project, http://dataportability.org
Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.): Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)
Do Not Track, http://donottrack.us
Economides, N.: “Net Neutrality,” Non-Discrimination, and Digital Distribution of Content Through the Internet. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy 4, 209–233 (2008)
GNU Affero General Public License. Version 3 (November 19, 2007), http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html
Karat, C.M.: The Computer User’s Bill of Rights (1988), http://theomandel.com/resources/users-bill-of-rights
Karat, C.M., Brodie, C., Karat, J.: Usable Privacy and Security for Personal Information Management. Comm. ACM 49(1), 56–57 (2006)
Kelion, L.: Future of the Internet Debated at NETmundial in Brazil. BBC News (April 22, 2014), http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27108869
Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. CSCW 7, 165–185 (1998)
Kiss, J.: An Online Magna Carta: Berners-Lee Calls for Bill of Rights for Web. The Guardian (March 11, 2014)
Lessig, L.: Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. Penguin, New York (2005)
English Translation of the New Version of Brazil’s Marco Civil, http://infojustice.org/archives/31272
Mari, A.: Brazil Passes Groundbreaking Internet Governance Bill. ZDNet (March 26, 2014), http://www.zdnet.com/brazil-passes-groundbreaking-internet-governance-bill-7000027740
NETmundial Draft Outcome Document (April 14, 2014), http://document.netmundial.br/
NETmundial Multistakeholder Statement (April 24, 2014), http://netmundial.br/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/NETmundial-Multistakeholder-Document.pdf
O’Reilly, D.: Time to Update the Software User’s Bill of Rights (December 29, 2009), http://www.cnet.com/news/time-to-update-the-software-users-bill-of-rights
Qualtrics: Online Survey Software and Insight Platform, http://www.qualtrics.com
Parens, B.: The Open Source Definition. In: Di Bona, C., Ockman, S., Stone, M. (eds.) Open Sources: Voices From the Open Source Revolution, O’Reilly, Sebastopol (1999)
Patrianakos, B.: The Internet User’s Bill of Rights (2014), http://userbillofrights.org/
Rosen, J.: The Right to Be Forgotten. Stanford Law Rev. Online. 64, 88 (2012)
Mrs, H.E.: Dilma Rousseff, President (September 24, 2013), http://gadebate.un.org/68/brazil/
Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1993)
Smarr, J., Canter, M., Scoble, R., Arrington, M.: A Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web (2007), http://the.networkingur.us/post/2007/09/05/A-Bill-of-Rights-for-Users-of-the-Social-Web
Stallman, R.: Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Free Software Foundation, Cambridge, MA (2002)
Viégas, F.B., Wattenberg, M., McKeon, M.M.: The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. In: Schuler, D. (ed.) HCII 2007 and OCSC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4564, pp. 445–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Web We Want, https://webwewant.org
Your Portability Policy, https://web.archive.org/web/20120126204316/http://portabilitypolicy.org/sample-policies.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Davies, T. (2014). Digital Rights and Freedoms: A Framework for Surveying Users and Analyzing Policies. In: Aiello, L.M., McFarland, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8851. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_31
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13734-6_31
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13733-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13734-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)