Skip to main content

Normative Criteria for the Development and Appraisal of Marketing Theory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1992 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

This paper examines the role of explanation in theory development, and the factors which make an explanation acceptable. Normative criteria for developing valid explanatory models are proposed. Criteria for appraising competing models are also presented. Two separate hierarchies are proposed, and are illustrated using a well-known model in marketing. It is hoped that this will lead to greater public debate relating to the assessment of theory development in marketing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, Paul F. 1983. "Marketing, Scientific Progress, & Scientific Method. "Journal of Marketing. 47(Fair): 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. 1988. "Relative to What - That is the Question." Journal of Consumer Research. 15 (June): 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, Richard P. 1984. "A Prospectus for Theory Construction in Marketing", Journal of Marketing. 48 (Winter): 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calder, Bobby J., Lynn W. Phillips, and Alice M. Tybout. 1981. "Designing Research for Application", Journal of Consumer Research. 8 (September): 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Converse, Paul D. 1949. "New Laws of Retail Gravitation", Journal of Marketing. 14 (October): 379–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hage, Jerald. 1972. Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G. 1966. Philosophy of Natural Science. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • —and Paul Oppenheim. 1953. "The Logic of Explanation", in Readings in the Philosophy of Science. H.Feigl and M. Brodbeck, eds., New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff, David L. 1964. "Defining and Estimating a Trading Area", Journal of Marketing. 28 (July): 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • –and Richard R.Batsell. 1977. "Delimiting the Areal Extent of a Market Area. " Journal of Marketing Research. 4(November): 581–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, Shelby D. 1983a. Marketing Theory: The Philosophy of Marketing Science Homewood,IL: Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1983b. "General Theories and the Fundamental Explanada of Marketing," Journal of Marketing. 47 (Fall): 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1989. "Naturalistic, Humanistic, and Interpretive Enquiry: Challenges and Ultimate Potential," in Interpretive Consumer Research, ed. Elizabeth Hirschman, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1990. "Truth in Marketing Theory and Research," Journal of Marketing. 54(July): 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, Robert. 1988. "Distinguishing Among Competing Theories of the Market Share Effect. " Journal of Marketing. 52 (October): 68–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago,IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meehan, Eugene J. 1968. Explanation in Social Science: A System Paradigm. Homewood, IL: Dorsey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. 1968. Social Theory and Social Structure. NY:Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittelstaedt, Robert A. 1971. "Criteria for a Theory of Consumer Behavior," in Consumer Behavior: Contemporary Research in Action, eds. Robert J. Holloway, Robert A. Mittelstaedt, and M. Venkatesan, 8– 13. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monroe, Kent et al. 1988. "Developing, Disseminating, and Utilizing Marketing Knowledge. " Journal of Marketing. 52 (October): 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, Ernest. 1961. The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1983. Realism and the Aim of Science. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, Jagdish N. and Dennis E. Garrett. 1986. Marketing Theory: Classic and Contemporary Readings. Cincinatti, Ohio: Southwestern Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, Harvey. 1988. "Relativism for Consumer Research?" J. of Consumer Research. 15(June): 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Merle B. 1965. Philosophy and the Science of Behavior. New York: Appleton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, James. 1979. "Scientific Explanation", The British Journal of the Philosophy of Science. 30: 41–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaltman, Gerald, Christian R.A.Pinson, and R. Angelmar. 1973. Metatheory and Consumer Research. NY: Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, John. 1978. Reliable Knowledge. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Misra, S. (2015). Normative Criteria for the Development and Appraisal of Marketing Theory. In: Crittenden, V.L. (eds) Proceedings of the 1992 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13248-8_75

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics