Skip to main content

Business Models: Some Implications for USPS

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Postal and Delivery Innovation in the Digital Economy

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy ((TREP,volume 50))

Abstract

Designing appropriate policies to reform the United States Postal Service (USPS) requires an understanding of business models: privately-owned competitive firms, different forms of regulated monopolies, labor-owned and publicly-owned enterprises, and government agencies. The most crucial factors in comparing these institutional forms are identifying the residual claimants and assessing the power of the incentives and the ability they have to promote efficient operation. Cross-subsidy, allocative and internal efficiency, externalities, innovation, and market structure are also important. Adequate reform of USPS requires Congressional acceptance that the government agency model should be replaced by more independent or privatized models adopted in other countries.

The authors thank participants at the Center for Research in Regulated Industries 2014 Advanced Workshop in Regulation and Competition on New Business Models and Conservation Programs, the 33rd Eastern Conference, the 22nd Conference on Postal and Delivery Economics, and The First Henan Symposium of Development and Institutional Economics, School of Economics, Henan University. We particularly thank Preston Finley and James I. Campbell, Jr, for their discussant comments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    The formal definition of high-powered, residual claimants and other terms will be found in Sect. 3.

  2. 2.

    Sappington and Sidak (2003) argue that under sales revenue maximization this will be case.

  3. 3.

    Labor managed firms are not necessarily inefficient. Law firms and accounting firms are labor-managed firms. Another exception is UPS. Its big difference was that it was owned mostly by management. In addition, it had a highly developed policy of providing opportunities for progression to management by its drivers. So, the power of the incentives was strong. However, problems of coming up with the equivalent of a market valuation for the firm proved to be a difficult problem. As a result in 1999 UPS floated an IPO, so that a value of its stock was established in the stock market.

  4. 4.

    Toime (1991, p. 275). Elmar Toime was Chief Executive of NZ Post.

  5. 5.

    Prior to PAEA USPS provided a hotchpotch of subsidies to other agencies, e.g. covering the military pensions accrued by its employees, as outlined in Congressional Budget Office 2006. PAEA replaced this with the requirement to prefund healthcare of all retirees.

  6. 6.

    PAEA allowed for a reset but USPS declined to do so.

References

  • Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In N. Richard (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. M. (1994). Private ownership form and productive efficiency: Electric cooperatives vs. investor-owned utilities. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 6(4), 399–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonbright, J. C. (1961). Principles of public utility rates. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braeutigam, R., & Panzar, J. C. (1989). Diversification incentives under ‘Price-Based’ and ‘Cost-Based’ regulation. The Rand Journal of Economics, 20(3), 373–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. (1987). Why regulated firms should be kept out of unregulated markets: Understanding the divestiture in U.S. v. AT&T. Antitrust Bulletin, 32, 741–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. J. (1989). Regulating by ‘Capping’ prices. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 1(2), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. J. (1990). Cross-subsidization and cost misallocation by regulated monopolists. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, T. J., & Crew, M. A. (2014). Gross substitutes versus marginal substitutes. In M. A. Crew & T. J. Brennan (Eds.), The role of postal service in a digital age. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., & Kahlon, R. S. (2014). Guaranteed return regulation: A case study of regulation of water in California. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46(1), 112–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., & Kleindorfer, P. R. (2008). Regulation and the USO under entry (with P.R. Kleindorfer). In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Competition and regulation in the postal and delivery sector. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crew, M. A., Kleindorfer, P. R., & Campbell, J. L., Jr. (2008). Handbook of worldwide postal reform. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, A. (1991). The economics of regulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littlechild, S. C. (1983). Regulation of British telecom profitability. London: Department of Trade and Industry.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, W. (1974). Bureaucracy and representative government. New York: Aldine Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappington, D., & Sidak, J. G. (2003). Incentives for anticompetitive behavior by public enterprises. Review of Industrial Organization, 22, 183–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (2013). The process of creative destruction. In D. A. Crane & H. Hovenkamp (Eds.), The making of competition policy: Legal and economic sources (pp. 282–305). New York: Oxford University Press. Originally in Schumpeter, J. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toime, E. (1991). Competitive strategy for New Zealand post. In M. A. Crew & P. R. Kleindorfer (Eds.), Competition and innovation in postal services. Norwell: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, B. (1958). The firm in Illyria: Market syndicalism. American Economic Review, 48(4), 566–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1967). The economics of discretionary behavior. Chicago: Markham.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael A. Crew .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Crew, M.A., Brennan, T.J. (2015). Business Models: Some Implications for USPS. In: Crew, M., Brennan, T. (eds) Postal and Delivery Innovation in the Digital Economy. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy, vol 50. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12874-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics