Abstract
The chapter presents an overview of numerical modeling techniques for equivalent porous media (EPM) and conduit flow formulations, including a case study illustrating the value of conduit presentation. The authors provide an overview of basic numerical modeling concepts, including layering and the assignment of boundary conditions. The limitations of using classical MODFLOW EPM for karst aquifers are discussed, and alternative approaches such as the Conduit Flow Process (CFP) are introduced. Different implementations of the CFP are described, including discrete pipe networks and high-conductivity turbulent–laminar layers. While acknowledging the difficulties of numeric modeling of karst systems, the authors present justification for the use of new tools such as the CFP. This includes the ability to simulate sinks, turbulent and laminar flow processes, and two-way water exchange between porous media and conduits. More generally, the authors explain why and how numeric modeling adds value to water resources and site remediation projects of all kinds. The case study compares the results of EPM and CFP numerical modeling approaches for a karstic site in the southeast USA.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Darcy H (1856) Les fontaines publiques de la ville de Dijon; Exposition et application des principes a suivre et des formulas a employer dans les questions de distribution d’eau; Appendice, Note D. Victor Dalmont (editeur), Libraire des Corps Imperiaux des Ports et Chausses et des Mines, Paris
Harbaugh AW (2005) MODFLOW-2005, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model—the ground-water flow process. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6-A16 (variously paginated)
Kresic N (2013) Water in karst: management, vulnerability, and restoration. McGraw Hill, New York
Kresic N, Mikszewski A (2013) Hydrogeological conceptual site models: data analysis and visualization. CRC/Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton
Mikszewski A, Kresic N (2012) Numeric modeling of karst aquifers: comparison of EPM and CFP models. In: Proceedings IAH 2012 congress, Niagara Falls, Canada
Rumbaugh JO, Rumbaugh DB (2011) Guide to using groundwater vistas, Version 6. Environmental Simulations, Inc., Reinholds, p 307
Shoemaker WB, Kuniansky EL, Birk S, Bauer S, Swain ED (2008) Documentation of a Conduit Flow Process (CFP) for MODFLOW-2005. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chap. A24
USGS (United States Geological Survey) (2011) USGS photographic library. Available at: http://libraryphoto.cr.usgs.gov
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mikszewski, A., Kresic, N. (2015). Mathematical Modeling of Karst Aquifers. In: Stevanović, Z. (eds) Karst Aquifers—Characterization and Engineering. Professional Practice in Earth Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12850-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12849-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12850-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)